@delta No, I understood the context. I just think it's hilarious that you think you're the exception when your code has a very clear example of the kind of shitty hacks needed for backwards compatibility.

Me: We all know PGP is bad because it forces you to support legacy bullshit like 1024-bit RSA keys, but I'm specifically going to write a blog post about email encryption as not just a technical challenge.

@delta: subtoots my blog post

Their source code: Disables TLS security to support legacy 1024-bit RSA.

https://github.com/chatmail/core/blob/9d7db202256ee334260c7ebccc3ab6403ee59a6c/src/net/tls.rs#L27-L40