@eunews@mastodon.social thats positive news
tragivictoria@mastodon.catgirl.cloud
Posts
-
UK Prime Minister Starmer seeks support for international X ban -
Hot take: good riddance.@lxak@goblin.technology @vkc@linuxmom.net oh no, i didnt meant to question this, i just meant to say that extensions arent really necessary here, since there are at least 3 GUI options for changing it (and its being discussed to put it in Settings app)
-
Hot take: good riddance.@scruss@xoxo.zone @vkc@linuxmom.net
Gnome tried to get rid of icons on the desktop a few years ago. User pressure brought them back (admittedly through some pretty foul shell hacks)
That happened with release of GNOME 3, in 2011 and GNOME never brought them back.
-
Hot take: good riddance.@lxak@goblin.technology @vkc@linuxmom.net Why extension? There are other ways to do it
-
Hot take: good riddance.@draeand@the-gdn.net @vkc@linuxmom.net ehhhhhh…
https://tesk.page/2025/06/18/its-true-we-dont-care-about-accessibility-on-linux/
-
Hot take: good riddance.@Saorsa@neondystopia.world @vkc@linuxmom.net
GNOME is held accountable only to the developers and people within their foundation and not the community
GNOME is a project made out of volunteers, and helding volunteers "accountable" isn't ethical. If someone wants to take part if developing GNOME, or project in its proximity, there is guide https://welcome.gnome.org/ for people interested in contributing.
In fact, feedback is valuable, too. As long as it's respectful.
-
Hot take: good riddance.@glent@aus.social @vkc@linuxmom.net
What fuels the anger is the annoyance at the lack of reflection within Gnome of its role in the failure of desktop Linux.
Dude, are you fucking serious? 4% and constantly growing is a failure?
It's some project made by volunteers in their free time, people who are still personally offended GNOME 2 era is gone are owed NOTHING.
Most notably it's insular design choices in Gnome 3, and the early shipment of that non-ready software, reducing Linux's share of the market from MacOS levels to a third of that.
What the fuck are you talking about? Serious question.
Today, yet another insular design choice by Gnome
Ah yes, because surely feature that is constant source of confusion to more people that can be counted is insulated from the user base. If we sticked to the desires of loud minorities, we would get nowhere.
-
Hot take: good riddance.@eseilt@mastodon.scot @vkc@linuxmom.net
They do have a history of breaking workflows for no good reason.
whose lives it makes more difficult will complain.
Is clicking some button difficult?
-
Hot take: good riddance.@theodric@social.linux.pizza @vkc@linuxmom.net You're talking as if the desktop hurt you personally.
-
Hot take: good riddance.@Saorsa@neondystopia.world @vkc@linuxmom.net worth noting most of those people dont use GNOME
-
Hot take: good riddance.@bruce@darkmoon.social @vkc@linuxmom.net pro-tip: it's impossible to tell intentions of people over text. tone indicators are the way to go
