@YKantRachelRead@social.treehouse.systems I… don’t think I agree with that, at least not fully.

I don’t think “abuser” is category, exactly, abuse is an action and it’s an action we’re all capable of. Denying that is a huge part of the problem in so, so many spaces. More than that, though, I think some people who act abusively can actually be stopped by being confronted and challenged. In these cases, I don’t think this needs to be something public. I suppose one could argue that that isn’t really abuse, but that feels “no true Scotsmen” to me.

Idk, just my 2 cents. I get where you’re coming from, though.

@YKantRachelRead@social.treehouse.systems I think people forget that trans rules of engagement says to resolve things privately when possible

And sometime it isn’t

C++ was written by lunatics

Why does anyone use this

@winter @nyx@social.xenofem.me instead I will kiss girls

@tauon@possum.city xnfm looks kinda terrible sometimes

@catsalad@infosec.exchange I am going to use this post to explain logic in my math classes