Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. #retrocomputing folks: I'm trying to get a sense of the proportion of people here who are into retrocomputing today but didn't experience the machines when they first came on the market.

#retrocomputing folks: I'm trying to get a sense of the proportion of people here who are into retrocomputing today but didn't experience the machines when they first came on the market.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
retrocomputing
57 Posts 29 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ARGVMI~1.PIFA ARGVMI~1.PIF

    @silvermoon82

    You could have upgraded it to a 486. Not a Pentium, though—Pentium motherboards were ATX and needed the case to provide a soft power button.

    As far as I know, nothing much changed after that, so you could put modern hardware in a Pentium-era case…although you might need to drill some extra vent holes in it and add some more fans!

    @fluidlogic

    ? Offline
    ? Offline
    Guest
    wrote last edited by
    #45

    @argv_minus_one @silvermoon82

    No, lots of the early socket 5 pentium motherboards were plain-AT, it wasn't until the later ones, with socket 7 and SDRAM, that they started adopting ATX. Mostly because it meant they could get 3.3v directly from the psu instead of needing a regulator on the mobo.

    I had a gateway 2000 100mhz pentium with a big clonky power button and big hot 3.3v regulators on the motherboard.

    C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Amin GirasolF Amin Girasol

      @quinn it's more of a mix than I expected!

      geraldewG This user is from outside of this forum
      geraldewG This user is from outside of this forum
      geraldew
      wrote last edited by
      #46

      @fluidlogic @quinn maybe more of a mix than you might guess.

      I'm not active in any "retro" sense, but I did work for an 8-bit maker in the 1980s - as well as having the same gear personally.

      Which means I don't have a rosy nostalgia and instead remember how flaky the hardware was, how scant the documentation was, how few were our ways to get answers - etc.

      But what I am grateful for in retrospect, is how understandable those systems were. So much of what I learned then, still guides me.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Amin GirasolF Amin Girasol

        #retrocomputing folks: I'm trying to get a sense of the proportion of people here who are into retrocomputing today but didn't experience the machines when they first came on the market. I want everyone's input! Please boost!

        (I'll ask the same question about minicomputers. This poll is about the early consumer home computers released between say 1977 and 1994.)

        RevK :verified_r:R This user is from outside of this forum
        RevK :verified_r:R This user is from outside of this forum
        RevK :verified_r:
        wrote last edited by
        #47

        @fluidlogic I could only dream of 16 bit processors 🙂

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • ? Guest

          @argv_minus_one @silvermoon82

          No, lots of the early socket 5 pentium motherboards were plain-AT, it wasn't until the later ones, with socket 7 and SDRAM, that they started adopting ATX. Mostly because it meant they could get 3.3v directly from the psu instead of needing a regulator on the mobo.

          I had a gateway 2000 100mhz pentium with a big clonky power button and big hot 3.3v regulators on the motherboard.

          C This user is from outside of this forum
          C This user is from outside of this forum
          Nicola
          wrote last edited by
          #48

          @lackthereof @argv_minus_one @silvermoon82 Also there were Pentium Overdrive chips that naturally fit in pre-ATX boards.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • 🇳🇿  :tinoflag: 💉*9 RogerR 🇳🇿 :tinoflag: 💉*9 Roger

            @fluidlogic I worked on PDP 11s from the mid 70s to 1981 then onto Vax gear. So 16bits then 32 bits. It meant I got into 32 bits early and I wasn't interested in the PC machines. I did dabble in Windows towards the end of the 80s because a client wanted it and... only 16 bits? Are you kidding me?

            Amin GirasolF This user is from outside of this forum
            Amin GirasolF This user is from outside of this forum
            Amin Girasol
            wrote last edited by
            #49

            @rogerparkinson did you skip the 8-bitters entirely?

            You're a candidate for the minicomputer poll!

            🇳🇿  :tinoflag: 💉*9 RogerR 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • ARGVMI~1.PIFA ARGVMI~1.PIF

              @fluidlogic

              I don't think you could buy any 8- or 16-bit computers in 1994. That was well into the 32-bit era.

              The beginning of the end of the 16-bit era was 1986. That's when the 386 came out. It was obsolete in 1989, so that's when I'd say the 32-bit era had begun in earnest.

              Amin GirasolF This user is from outside of this forum
              Amin GirasolF This user is from outside of this forum
              Amin Girasol
              wrote last edited by
              #50

              @argv_minus_one yes, they overlapped. In 1992, Atari released the Falcon and Commodore released the Amiga 4000.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • James MitchellW James Mitchell

                @fluidlogic there's a lot of room to carve this up. Like CP/M was mostly before my time but I got pretty into those machines when they were at once relatively almost new, but also very obsolete- and I'd argue that was retrocomputing. Similar for the TRS/80 model 2/16/6000 which could also run XENIX and verged on being minis.

                Amin GirasolF This user is from outside of this forum
                Amin GirasolF This user is from outside of this forum
                Amin Girasol
                wrote last edited by
                #51

                @wotsac yes "heyday" is shorthand for "the time during which a machine felt new and exciting and was productive".

                This is not remotely a scientific poll! I have no idea if people who are answering are really current retrocomputing aficionados, for example.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Amin GirasolF Amin Girasol

                  @rogerparkinson did you skip the 8-bitters entirely?

                  You're a candidate for the minicomputer poll!

                  🇳🇿  :tinoflag: 💉*9 RogerR This user is from outside of this forum
                  🇳🇿  :tinoflag: 💉*9 RogerR This user is from outside of this forum
                  🇳🇿 :tinoflag: 💉*9 Roger
                  wrote last edited by
                  #52

                  @fluidlogic I did skip them entirely, yes. Though I have done things with embedded 8 bit devices more recently eg ATTiny85 and Teensy.

                  Amin GirasolF 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • 🇳🇿  :tinoflag: 💉*9 RogerR 🇳🇿 :tinoflag: 💉*9 Roger

                    @fluidlogic I did skip them entirely, yes. Though I have done things with embedded 8 bit devices more recently eg ATTiny85 and Teensy.

                    Amin GirasolF This user is from outside of this forum
                    Amin GirasolF This user is from outside of this forum
                    Amin Girasol
                    wrote last edited by
                    #53

                    @rogerparkinson did you consider them mere toys at the time?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • ARGVMI~1.PIFA ARGVMI~1.PIF

                      @fluidlogic

                      I don't think you could buy any 8- or 16-bit computers in 1994. That was well into the 32-bit era.

                      The beginning of the end of the 16-bit era was 1986. That's when the 386 came out. It was obsolete in 1989, so that's when I'd say the 32-bit era had begun in earnest.

                      ? Offline
                      ? Offline
                      Guest
                      wrote last edited by
                      #54

                      @argv_minus_one

                      You could definitely buy major name consumer grade 286 desktop PCs in 1990.

                      My dad replaced our family's z80-based Heathkit with a 286-based Packard Bell on or around that year.

                      A lot of people just didn't use Windows back then, and the extra cost of a 386 had little advantage if you weren't doing gui+multitasking.

                      It wasn't the 386 that ushered in the end of 16 bit computing, it was windows 3.1... which could run on a 286 but was painfully restricted there.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Amin GirasolF Amin Girasol

                        @AdrianRiskin thank you for sharing that story. The PET is probably repairable for not much money!

                        Adrian Riskin 🇵🇸🍉A This user is from outside of this forum
                        Adrian Riskin 🇵🇸🍉A This user is from outside of this forum
                        Adrian Riskin 🇵🇸🍉
                        wrote last edited by
                        #55

                        @fluidlogic really? Fixing it probably isn't for me, but I would like to give it to someone who could fix and enjoy it (and pick it up in Los Angeles bc it's unreasonably heavy). Do you happen to know how I could find folks who might be interested?

                        Amin GirasolF 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • Adrian Riskin 🇵🇸🍉A Adrian Riskin 🇵🇸🍉

                          @fluidlogic really? Fixing it probably isn't for me, but I would like to give it to someone who could fix and enjoy it (and pick it up in Los Angeles bc it's unreasonably heavy). Do you happen to know how I could find folks who might be interested?

                          Amin GirasolF This user is from outside of this forum
                          Amin GirasolF This user is from outside of this forum
                          Amin Girasol
                          wrote last edited by
                          #56

                          @AdrianRiskin yes! Put the word out on here, using the tags #retrocomputing , #vintagecomputing , #commodorepet and optionally #losangeles and you'll get people popping up offering to take it off your hands. If you can include a snap or two, so much the better. Good luck!

                          I suggest not putting power into it, as the chemistry-based electronics will have degraded in storage and might pop, making repair harder.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Amin GirasolF Amin Girasol

                            #retrocomputing folks: I'm trying to get a sense of the proportion of people here who are into retrocomputing today but didn't experience the machines when they first came on the market. I want everyone's input! Please boost!

                            (I'll ask the same question about minicomputers. This poll is about the early consumer home computers released between say 1977 and 1994.)

                            Farticle Accelerator🇨🇦S This user is from outside of this forum
                            Farticle Accelerator🇨🇦S This user is from outside of this forum
                            Farticle Accelerator🇨🇦
                            wrote last edited by
                            #57
                            @fluidlogic Editing a post with a poll resets any votes already cast on that poll. (it's the way Mastodon works)

                            Everyone who voted before will have to do so again if they want.
                            1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            0
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Don't have an account? Register

                            • Login or register to search.
                            Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • World
                            • Users
                            • Groups