Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. current thoughts after experimenting with some proposed discord alternatives recently:matrix: despite the honourable efforts of instance maintainers, i actually think that client apps are the achilles heel of matrix.

current thoughts after experimenting with some proposed discord alternatives recently:matrix: despite the honourable efforts of instance maintainers, i actually think that client apps are the achilles heel of matrix.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
31 Posts 10 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Jes - Hedgehog Edition J Jes - Hedgehog Edition
    @ari the only real way to do federation in chat apps is probably more like XMPP where it's a burden of the user to store chat logs
    Jes - Hedgehog Edition J This user is from outside of this forum
    Jes - Hedgehog Edition J This user is from outside of this forum
    Jes - Hedgehog Edition
    wrote last edited by
    #21
    @ari but yeah connecting directly to servers for chats seems to be the most efficient way of doing it if chat history is a concern
    ari :ariYeah:A 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • ari :ariYeah:A ari :ariYeah:

      @fiore fwiw, while looking into matrix hosting, i found that a webRTC connection over relays (see TURN) was the preferred method of setting up VOIP.

      while it would sidestep stock mumble quite substantially, if the architecture is designed to be extensible enough, i don't see why a mumble server couldn't just negotiate a relay link between participants to support even a simple video feed!

      φF This user is from outside of this forum
      φF This user is from outside of this forum
      φ
      wrote last edited by
      #22
      ithink murmur supporting smth like that could be cool yes

      or even just . a standalone thing webrtc server , which then the client implementation could make appear as tho they were part of the same interface . idk mumble is so cool and simple , you could pretty much have a full discord replacement if you mesh mumble irc and webrtc in the right way
      ari :ariYeah:A 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Ghost 🇺🇦G Ghost 🇺🇦

        @ari@fedi.arimelody.space When I started looking into it, I thought self hosting and encryption being annoying would be the main issue with matrix, but it's 100% the clients, they're fine but dear god it's not something I could use long term

        ari :ariYeah:A This user is from outside of this forum
        ari :ariYeah:A This user is from outside of this forum
        ari :ariYeah:
        wrote last edited by
        #23

        @ghost_desu i was genuinely surprised how much the onus was on clients. really ringing home that the FOSS space has more backend developers than frontend designers

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Jes - Hedgehog Edition J Jes - Hedgehog Edition
          @ari but yeah connecting directly to servers for chats seems to be the most efficient way of doing it if chat history is a concern
          ari :ariYeah:A This user is from outside of this forum
          ari :ariYeah:A This user is from outside of this forum
          ari :ariYeah:
          wrote last edited by
          #24

          @Jes and perfectly sensible for 99% of what people use a community chat platform for- even on discord, where albeit outages are very infrequent, it's not the end of the world if our node goes down for a little while.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Alexia ΘΔA Alexia ΘΔ

            oh, ty!! not sure if the edit federated only after I replied or if it was bad timing on my part

            ty nonetheless!

            ari :ariYeah:A This user is from outside of this forum
            ari :ariYeah:A This user is from outside of this forum
            ari :ariYeah:
            wrote last edited by
            #25

            @alexia i edited around the same time, no worries! regardless, i'll be taking more time to look into fluxer properly, following this.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • φF φ
              ithink murmur supporting smth like that could be cool yes

              or even just . a standalone thing webrtc server , which then the client implementation could make appear as tho they were part of the same interface . idk mumble is so cool and simple , you could pretty much have a full discord replacement if you mesh mumble irc and webrtc in the right way
              ari :ariYeah:A This user is from outside of this forum
              ari :ariYeah:A This user is from outside of this forum
              ari :ariYeah:
              wrote last edited by
              #26

              @fiore oh yeah, to be clear, making it feel integrated would 100% be part of the plan there

              φF 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • ari :ariYeah:A ari :ariYeah:

                @fiore oh yeah, to be clear, making it feel integrated would 100% be part of the plan there

                φF This user is from outside of this forum
                φF This user is from outside of this forum
                φ
                wrote last edited by
                #27
                tbh i like the idea of murmur being minimal as a server , thats what makes it cool and easy to host

                but yea like whatever im making a nothingburger here its not like im gonna go and implement this myself , i should NOT be allowed near ui code
                adzuki-11C 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • φF φ
                  tbh i like the idea of murmur being minimal as a server , thats what makes it cool and easy to host

                  but yea like whatever im making a nothingburger here its not like im gonna go and implement this myself , i should NOT be allowed near ui code
                  adzuki-11C This user is from outside of this forum
                  adzuki-11C This user is from outside of this forum
                  adzuki-11
                  wrote last edited by
                  #28
                  @fiore @ari imma be real with you fiore. it does not actually need to be integrated with the voice chat program you can also just do screen sharing separately and have much greater odds of doing it well that way
                  adzuki-11C 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • adzuki-11C adzuki-11
                    @fiore @ari imma be real with you fiore. it does not actually need to be integrated with the voice chat program you can also just do screen sharing separately and have much greater odds of doing it well that way
                    adzuki-11C This user is from outside of this forum
                    adzuki-11C This user is from outside of this forum
                    adzuki-11
                    wrote last edited by
                    #29
                    @fiore @ari we dont need full featured conferencing software and i would argue are better off without it
                    ari :ariYeah:A 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • adzuki-11C adzuki-11
                      @fiore @ari we dont need full featured conferencing software and i would argue are better off without it
                      ari :ariYeah:A This user is from outside of this forum
                      ari :ariYeah:A This user is from outside of this forum
                      ari :ariYeah:
                      wrote last edited by
                      #30

                      @coolbean @fiore i appreciate the "gadget" mindset, truly, but i think you'll find most users will get Really Upset with you if you tell them they have to use a separate app to get screenshare (a technology that can already coexist with voice chat just fine)

                      adzuki-11C 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • ari :ariYeah:A ari :ariYeah:

                        @coolbean @fiore i appreciate the "gadget" mindset, truly, but i think you'll find most users will get Really Upset with you if you tell them they have to use a separate app to get screenshare (a technology that can already coexist with voice chat just fine)

                        adzuki-11C This user is from outside of this forum
                        adzuki-11C This user is from outside of this forum
                        adzuki-11
                        wrote last edited by
                        #31
                        @ari @fiore most users can suck my nuts
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        0
                        • R AodeRelay shared this topic
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups