Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Today in InfoSec Job Security News:

Today in InfoSec Job Security News:

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
133 Posts 102 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • da_667D da_667

    @GossiTheDog

    kwayk42K This user is from outside of this forum
    kwayk42K This user is from outside of this forum
    kwayk42
    wrote last edited by
    #5

    @da_667 @GossiTheDog

    kwayk42K 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Kevin BeaumontG Kevin Beaumont

      Today in InfoSec Job Security News:

      I was looking into an obvious ../.. vulnerability introduced into a major web framework today, and it was committed by username Claude on GitHub. Vibe coded, basically.

      So I started looking through Claude commits on GitHub, there’s over 2m of them and it’s about 5% of all open source code this month.

      https://github.com/search?q=author%3Aclaude&type=commits&s=author-date&o=desc

      As I looked through the code I saw the same class of vulns being introduced over, and over, again - several a minute.

      Martin SeegerM This user is from outside of this forum
      Martin SeegerM This user is from outside of this forum
      Martin Seeger
      wrote last edited by
      #6

      @GossiTheDog Consistency: so important 😱

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • da_667D da_667

        @GossiTheDog

        da_667D This user is from outside of this forum
        da_667D This user is from outside of this forum
        da_667
        wrote last edited by
        #7

        @GossiTheDog what's funny to me, is that there were influencers on linkedin a few days ago claiming claudecode could find vulnerabilities in code faster than humans, and they're like "look at all these openssl vulns it found!" now I'm like. "well no shit its finding vulnerabilities, when its the one introducing them."

        BrianD da_667D Der Brüsseler 🇪🇺D B'ad Samurai 🐐🇺🇦B Ray—Golden Retriever Whisperer—🔝InsightsZ 6 Replies Last reply
        0
        • R ActivityRelay shared this topic
        • Kevin BeaumontG Kevin Beaumont

          Today in InfoSec Job Security News:

          I was looking into an obvious ../.. vulnerability introduced into a major web framework today, and it was committed by username Claude on GitHub. Vibe coded, basically.

          So I started looking through Claude commits on GitHub, there’s over 2m of them and it’s about 5% of all open source code this month.

          https://github.com/search?q=author%3Aclaude&type=commits&s=author-date&o=desc

          As I looked through the code I saw the same class of vulns being introduced over, and over, again - several a minute.

          h0h0kamH This user is from outside of this forum
          h0h0kamH This user is from outside of this forum
          h0h0kam
          wrote last edited by
          #8

          @GossiTheDog sure, but it did that so much faster than a human could!

          AndrocatA 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • da_667D da_667

            @GossiTheDog what's funny to me, is that there were influencers on linkedin a few days ago claiming claudecode could find vulnerabilities in code faster than humans, and they're like "look at all these openssl vulns it found!" now I'm like. "well no shit its finding vulnerabilities, when its the one introducing them."

            BrianD This user is from outside of this forum
            BrianD This user is from outside of this forum
            Brian
            wrote last edited by
            #9

            @da_667 @GossiTheDog I will create the viruses and then sell my antivirus product to protect you

            Aristotelis TzafaliasA 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Kevin BeaumontG Kevin Beaumont

              Today in InfoSec Job Security News:

              I was looking into an obvious ../.. vulnerability introduced into a major web framework today, and it was committed by username Claude on GitHub. Vibe coded, basically.

              So I started looking through Claude commits on GitHub, there’s over 2m of them and it’s about 5% of all open source code this month.

              https://github.com/search?q=author%3Aclaude&type=commits&s=author-date&o=desc

              As I looked through the code I saw the same class of vulns being introduced over, and over, again - several a minute.

              Simon Zerafa (Status: :meowBox: 😊)S This user is from outside of this forum
              Simon Zerafa (Status: :meowBox: 😊)S This user is from outside of this forum
              Simon Zerafa (Status: :meowBox: 😊)
              wrote last edited by
              #10

              @GossiTheDog

              So a supply chain attack or actually genuine commits (or a mix as camouflage?) 🤯

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • DJGummikuhD DJGummikuh

                @GossiTheDog so would you consider this mass accidents or a targeted supply-chain attack?

                Aleksandr KoltsoffN This user is from outside of this forum
                Aleksandr KoltsoffN This user is from outside of this forum
                Aleksandr Koltsoff
                wrote last edited by
                #11

                @DJGummikuh @GossiTheDog The purpose of a system is what it does. IMO these are not accidents.

                draeathD Violet MadderV 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • da_667D da_667

                  @GossiTheDog what's funny to me, is that there were influencers on linkedin a few days ago claiming claudecode could find vulnerabilities in code faster than humans, and they're like "look at all these openssl vulns it found!" now I'm like. "well no shit its finding vulnerabilities, when its the one introducing them."

                  da_667D This user is from outside of this forum
                  da_667D This user is from outside of this forum
                  da_667
                  wrote last edited by
                  #12

                  @GossiTheDog ladies and gentlemen, it's this stupid shit (tm) that we are paying up the ass for new SSDs and RAM for.

                  BrianD Ray—Golden Retriever Whisperer—🔝InsightsZ 2 Replies Last reply
                  1
                  0
                  • h0h0kamH h0h0kam

                    @GossiTheDog sure, but it did that so much faster than a human could!

                    AndrocatA This user is from outside of this forum
                    AndrocatA This user is from outside of this forum
                    Androcat
                    wrote last edited by
                    #13

                    @hohokam @GossiTheDog

                    The LLM can fuck up your project much faster than human developers ever could.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Kevin BeaumontG Kevin Beaumont

                      Today in InfoSec Job Security News:

                      I was looking into an obvious ../.. vulnerability introduced into a major web framework today, and it was committed by username Claude on GitHub. Vibe coded, basically.

                      So I started looking through Claude commits on GitHub, there’s over 2m of them and it’s about 5% of all open source code this month.

                      https://github.com/search?q=author%3Aclaude&type=commits&s=author-date&o=desc

                      As I looked through the code I saw the same class of vulns being introduced over, and over, again - several a minute.

                      Harry SintonenH This user is from outside of this forum
                      Harry SintonenH This user is from outside of this forum
                      Harry Sintonen
                      wrote last edited by
                      #14

                      It's almost as if the language models are actually not intelligent at all.

                      Who would have thought!?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Kevin BeaumontG Kevin Beaumont

                        Today in InfoSec Job Security News:

                        I was looking into an obvious ../.. vulnerability introduced into a major web framework today, and it was committed by username Claude on GitHub. Vibe coded, basically.

                        So I started looking through Claude commits on GitHub, there’s over 2m of them and it’s about 5% of all open source code this month.

                        https://github.com/search?q=author%3Aclaude&type=commits&s=author-date&o=desc

                        As I looked through the code I saw the same class of vulns being introduced over, and over, again - several a minute.

                        cR0wC This user is from outside of this forum
                        cR0wC This user is from outside of this forum
                        cR0w
                        wrote last edited by
                        #15

                        @GossiTheDog If only a significant number of security practitioners could have seen it coming and warned people.

                        FennixF Alan Langford 🇨🇦🧤🧊摏A Klaus FrankA 3 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • da_667D da_667

                          @GossiTheDog what's funny to me, is that there were influencers on linkedin a few days ago claiming claudecode could find vulnerabilities in code faster than humans, and they're like "look at all these openssl vulns it found!" now I'm like. "well no shit its finding vulnerabilities, when its the one introducing them."

                          Der Brüsseler 🇪🇺D This user is from outside of this forum
                          Der Brüsseler 🇪🇺D This user is from outside of this forum
                          Der Brüsseler 🇪🇺
                          wrote last edited by
                          #16

                          @da_667 @GossiTheDog maybe it introduced them in the first place. Now its finding its own code.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Kevin BeaumontG Kevin Beaumont

                            Today in InfoSec Job Security News:

                            I was looking into an obvious ../.. vulnerability introduced into a major web framework today, and it was committed by username Claude on GitHub. Vibe coded, basically.

                            So I started looking through Claude commits on GitHub, there’s over 2m of them and it’s about 5% of all open source code this month.

                            https://github.com/search?q=author%3Aclaude&type=commits&s=author-date&o=desc

                            As I looked through the code I saw the same class of vulns being introduced over, and over, again - several a minute.

                            BastianB This user is from outside of this forum
                            BastianB This user is from outside of this forum
                            Bastian
                            wrote last edited by
                            #17

                            @GossiTheDog

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • Kevin BeaumontG Kevin Beaumont

                              Today in InfoSec Job Security News:

                              I was looking into an obvious ../.. vulnerability introduced into a major web framework today, and it was committed by username Claude on GitHub. Vibe coded, basically.

                              So I started looking through Claude commits on GitHub, there’s over 2m of them and it’s about 5% of all open source code this month.

                              https://github.com/search?q=author%3Aclaude&type=commits&s=author-date&o=desc

                              As I looked through the code I saw the same class of vulns being introduced over, and over, again - several a minute.

                              Tero Hänninen0 This user is from outside of this forum
                              Tero Hänninen0 This user is from outside of this forum
                              Tero Hänninen
                              wrote last edited by
                              #18

                              @GossiTheDog I like the part where people are using Claude to write CLAUDE.md to explain Claude about directory traversal.

                              Nothing in this supply chain could ever go wrong.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • Kevin BeaumontG Kevin Beaumont

                                Today in InfoSec Job Security News:

                                I was looking into an obvious ../.. vulnerability introduced into a major web framework today, and it was committed by username Claude on GitHub. Vibe coded, basically.

                                So I started looking through Claude commits on GitHub, there’s over 2m of them and it’s about 5% of all open source code this month.

                                https://github.com/search?q=author%3Aclaude&type=commits&s=author-date&o=desc

                                As I looked through the code I saw the same class of vulns being introduced over, and over, again - several a minute.

                                Sebastian BergmannS This user is from outside of this forum
                                Sebastian BergmannS This user is from outside of this forum
                                Sebastian Bergmann
                                wrote last edited by
                                #19

                                @GossiTheDog It is interesting that these changes are attributed to a "user named Claude" and not to the "human using the agent named Claude". This is how diffusion of responsibility works, I guess.

                                draeathD 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • Kevin BeaumontG Kevin Beaumont

                                  Today in InfoSec Job Security News:

                                  I was looking into an obvious ../.. vulnerability introduced into a major web framework today, and it was committed by username Claude on GitHub. Vibe coded, basically.

                                  So I started looking through Claude commits on GitHub, there’s over 2m of them and it’s about 5% of all open source code this month.

                                  https://github.com/search?q=author%3Aclaude&type=commits&s=author-date&o=desc

                                  As I looked through the code I saw the same class of vulns being introduced over, and over, again - several a minute.

                                  Thomas 🔭🕹️T This user is from outside of this forum
                                  Thomas 🔭🕹️T This user is from outside of this forum
                                  Thomas 🔭🕹️
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #20

                                  @GossiTheDog you're just jealous because it will cure cancer and fix climate change

                                  FennixF 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • da_667D da_667

                                    @GossiTheDog ladies and gentlemen, it's this stupid shit (tm) that we are paying up the ass for new SSDs and RAM for.

                                    BrianD This user is from outside of this forum
                                    BrianD This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Brian
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #21

                                    @da_667 @GossiTheDog There's not enough press on the downstream effects this stupid shit (tm) causes for any non-giant corp including those kids trying to build home labs to learn (like mine).

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • Kevin BeaumontG Kevin Beaumont

                                      Today in InfoSec Job Security News:

                                      I was looking into an obvious ../.. vulnerability introduced into a major web framework today, and it was committed by username Claude on GitHub. Vibe coded, basically.

                                      So I started looking through Claude commits on GitHub, there’s over 2m of them and it’s about 5% of all open source code this month.

                                      https://github.com/search?q=author%3Aclaude&type=commits&s=author-date&o=desc

                                      As I looked through the code I saw the same class of vulns being introduced over, and over, again - several a minute.

                                      Brian DavidE This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Brian DavidE This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Brian David
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #22

                                      @GossiTheDog was it Next.js?

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • Kevin BeaumontG Kevin Beaumont

                                        Today in InfoSec Job Security News:

                                        I was looking into an obvious ../.. vulnerability introduced into a major web framework today, and it was committed by username Claude on GitHub. Vibe coded, basically.

                                        So I started looking through Claude commits on GitHub, there’s over 2m of them and it’s about 5% of all open source code this month.

                                        https://github.com/search?q=author%3Aclaude&type=commits&s=author-date&o=desc

                                        As I looked through the code I saw the same class of vulns being introduced over, and over, again - several a minute.

                                        The Penguin of EvilE This user is from outside of this forum
                                        The Penguin of EvilE This user is from outside of this forum
                                        The Penguin of Evil
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #23

                                        @GossiTheDog So you are saying there is a business opportunity following claude around projects with bug bounties 😎

                                        Petr TesaříkP John LuskT 2 Replies Last reply
                                        0
                                        • Kevin BeaumontG Kevin Beaumont

                                          Today in InfoSec Job Security News:

                                          I was looking into an obvious ../.. vulnerability introduced into a major web framework today, and it was committed by username Claude on GitHub. Vibe coded, basically.

                                          So I started looking through Claude commits on GitHub, there’s over 2m of them and it’s about 5% of all open source code this month.

                                          https://github.com/search?q=author%3Aclaude&type=commits&s=author-date&o=desc

                                          As I looked through the code I saw the same class of vulns being introduced over, and over, again - several a minute.

                                          Richard HughesH This user is from outside of this forum
                                          Richard HughesH This user is from outside of this forum
                                          Richard Hughes
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #24

                                          @GossiTheDog I guess the AI security scanners will clean this up with their automated scan and CVE requests.</joke>

                                          Josh BressersJ 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups