Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. To the #VoteBlue people in the USA: Yes, voting for the #Democrats _is_ necessary in all upcoming elections.

To the #VoteBlue people in the USA: Yes, voting for the #Democrats _is_ necessary in all upcoming elections.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
votebluedemocrats
33 Posts 9 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • SlightlyCyberpunkA SlightlyCyberpunk

    @benroyce @juergen_hubert And every single election election you have to fight against the party that's supposed to be supporting you -- just like Mamdani did -- because you have no way to change the party itself!

    If we can get these people elected as Democrats despite the Democrats fighting against us the entire way then we can certainly get them elected under a party that supports them or even just gets out of their way. AIUI Mamdani's campaign was largely run not by the Democratic party but by the fucking DSA. So maybe the DSA should form a party.

    Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡©B This user is from outside of this forum
    Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡©B This user is from outside of this forum
    Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡©
    wrote last edited by
    #15

    @admin @juergen_hubert

    you have to fight against the party to take over the party, absolutely

    then once we control it, they support us

    HELLO

    are you trolling? what are you doing?

    "So maybe the DSA should form a party"

    oh yeah, divide the left vote in an FPTP voting system to guarantee 100 years of MAGA, real smart

    no: the DSA *takes over the democratic party*

    what is mamdani if not the beachhead for this winning strategy?

    SlightlyCyberpunkA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡©B Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡©

      @admin @juergen_hubert

      you have to fight against the party to take over the party, absolutely

      then once we control it, they support us

      HELLO

      are you trolling? what are you doing?

      "So maybe the DSA should form a party"

      oh yeah, divide the left vote in an FPTP voting system to guarantee 100 years of MAGA, real smart

      no: the DSA *takes over the democratic party*

      what is mamdani if not the beachhead for this winning strategy?

      SlightlyCyberpunkA This user is from outside of this forum
      SlightlyCyberpunkA This user is from outside of this forum
      SlightlyCyberpunk
      wrote last edited by
      #16

      @benroyce @juergen_hubert DSA *has* taken over the Democratic party at state levels. It doesn't work. The Democratic Party destroyed everything they could on the way out the door, leaving them to build a new party from scratch anyway, and then the national party and the wealthy donors built a new Democratic Party organization to oppose them.

      Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡©B 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • SlightlyCyberpunkA SlightlyCyberpunk

        @benroyce @juergen_hubert DSA *has* taken over the Democratic party at state levels. It doesn't work. The Democratic Party destroyed everything they could on the way out the door, leaving them to build a new party from scratch anyway, and then the national party and the wealthy donors built a new Democratic Party organization to oppose them.

        Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡©B This user is from outside of this forum
        Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡©B This user is from outside of this forum
        Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡©
        wrote last edited by
        #17

        @admin @juergen_hubert

        πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚

        i swear to god you have to be the most spineless whiny motherfucker i've met in a long time

        yes: everything is hopeless, because enough people exist like you who are hopeless

        do you have the faintest fucking perception in that head of yours that your piss poor attitude is a problem? have you ever heard of self-fulfilling prophecy?

        you've given up before you've begun to fight. therefore you lose. absolutely, that is what will happen! because of your attitude

        SlightlyCyberpunkA 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡©B Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡©

          @admin @juergen_hubert

          πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚

          i swear to god you have to be the most spineless whiny motherfucker i've met in a long time

          yes: everything is hopeless, because enough people exist like you who are hopeless

          do you have the faintest fucking perception in that head of yours that your piss poor attitude is a problem? have you ever heard of self-fulfilling prophecy?

          you've given up before you've begun to fight. therefore you lose. absolutely, that is what will happen! because of your attitude

          SlightlyCyberpunkA This user is from outside of this forum
          SlightlyCyberpunkA This user is from outside of this forum
          SlightlyCyberpunk
          wrote last edited by
          #18

          @benroyce @juergen_hubert I got plenty of hope. Hope that we can actually change things. Hope that we can do something other than the same damn strategy that's been failing for decades already. You're the one that seems to be saying that the only option is to settle in and enjoy the status quo.

          SlightlyCyberpunkA 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • SlightlyCyberpunkA SlightlyCyberpunk

            @benroyce @juergen_hubert I got plenty of hope. Hope that we can actually change things. Hope that we can do something other than the same damn strategy that's been failing for decades already. You're the one that seems to be saying that the only option is to settle in and enjoy the status quo.

            SlightlyCyberpunkA This user is from outside of this forum
            SlightlyCyberpunkA This user is from outside of this forum
            SlightlyCyberpunk
            wrote last edited by
            #19

            @benroyce @juergen_hubert My state has been voting for Democrats almost exclusively since the 80s. I must have missed the part where that fixed everything.

            Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡©B 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • SlightlyCyberpunkA SlightlyCyberpunk

              @benroyce @juergen_hubert My state has been voting for Democrats almost exclusively since the 80s. I must have missed the part where that fixed everything.

              Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡©B This user is from outside of this forum
              Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡©B This user is from outside of this forum
              Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡©
              wrote last edited by
              #20

              @admin @juergen_hubert

              Then propose an alternative approach. We can't start a third party in our stupid fucking voting system. So we're stuck with having to take over the dems. Im not calling it easy. Im calling it our only way forward. And youre not helping. And why? Third party dreams in RI (i think you're in RI)? Would you excuse me if i said this focus of yours is rather immaterial to national concerns? Please scope your words to national concerns and not your goals in RI

              SlightlyCyberpunkA 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡©B Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡©

                @admin @juergen_hubert

                Then propose an alternative approach. We can't start a third party in our stupid fucking voting system. So we're stuck with having to take over the dems. Im not calling it easy. Im calling it our only way forward. And youre not helping. And why? Third party dreams in RI (i think you're in RI)? Would you excuse me if i said this focus of yours is rather immaterial to national concerns? Please scope your words to national concerns and not your goals in RI

                SlightlyCyberpunkA This user is from outside of this forum
                SlightlyCyberpunkA This user is from outside of this forum
                SlightlyCyberpunk
                wrote last edited by
                #21

                @benroyce @juergen_hubert You can't go zero to national, doesn't matter if you're taking over the Dems or building something new. You start in the states you can change and you build from there. It's gonna take some time unfortunately. Should have started years ago, but second best time is now.

                Dumping FPTP would be a great step too, there's efforts to do that as well in plenty of places, including here in RI.

                Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡©B 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • SlightlyCyberpunkA SlightlyCyberpunk

                  @benroyce @juergen_hubert You can't go zero to national, doesn't matter if you're taking over the Dems or building something new. You start in the states you can change and you build from there. It's gonna take some time unfortunately. Should have started years ago, but second best time is now.

                  Dumping FPTP would be a great step too, there's efforts to do that as well in plenty of places, including here in RI.

                  Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡©B This user is from outside of this forum
                  Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡©B This user is from outside of this forum
                  Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡©
                  wrote last edited by
                  #22

                  @admin @juergen_hubert

                  and we'll get fptp dumped by voting people in who will get that done

                  we need *less* dreamers

                  more effective action

                  SlightlyCyberpunkA 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡©B Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡©

                    @admin @juergen_hubert

                    and we'll get fptp dumped by voting people in who will get that done

                    we need *less* dreamers

                    more effective action

                    SlightlyCyberpunkA This user is from outside of this forum
                    SlightlyCyberpunkA This user is from outside of this forum
                    SlightlyCyberpunk
                    wrote last edited by
                    #23

                    @benroyce @juergen_hubert No, you start where that isn't an issue until you've got the momentum to run for bigger shit. I'm not talking about running for President, we aren't gonna get anyone left of center in there by *any* strategy without doing a lot of work locally first.

                    Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡©B 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • SlightlyCyberpunkA SlightlyCyberpunk

                      @benroyce @juergen_hubert No, you start where that isn't an issue until you've got the momentum to run for bigger shit. I'm not talking about running for President, we aren't gonna get anyone left of center in there by *any* strategy without doing a lot of work locally first.

                      Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡©B This user is from outside of this forum
                      Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡©B This user is from outside of this forum
                      Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡©
                      wrote last edited by
                      #24

                      @admin @juergen_hubert

                      then you support the mamdani model and you're with us

                      because that's all i'm talking about

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡©B Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡©

                        @juergen_hubert

                        a focus on the dem estbmnt is a red herring

                        of course they suck

                        #mamdani showed us just show up and #vote for who we like. he got no support from the estbmnt, even hostility. now he's mayor

                        because we voted!

                        the dem estbmnt is not going to change. does it matter? why should we care?

                        1. ignore them

                        2. vote

                        *especially #primaries #primaries2026*

                        3. and replace them

                        et voila

                        voter anger is not the fault of #democrats

                        the dems being shit is the fault of people not voting

                        A This user is from outside of this forum
                        A This user is from outside of this forum
                        slash
                        wrote last edited by
                        #25

                        @benroyce @juergen_hubert @cascheranno

                        My take: You vote counts. If that were not true, why would they (both parties) spend so much time and money trying to stop you? They want a low turnout, because it's easier to tip an election that way.

                        The solution is obvious: Vote. I will tell you now; I don't care *who* you vote for. Just as long as you vote.

                        Want to do more? Volunteer to help folks get to the polls. Whatever gets the most people voting is how all this gets fixed.

                        Alf No ProblemA Grassroots JoeJ Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡©B 3 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • A slash

                          @benroyce @juergen_hubert @cascheranno

                          My take: You vote counts. If that were not true, why would they (both parties) spend so much time and money trying to stop you? They want a low turnout, because it's easier to tip an election that way.

                          The solution is obvious: Vote. I will tell you now; I don't care *who* you vote for. Just as long as you vote.

                          Want to do more? Volunteer to help folks get to the polls. Whatever gets the most people voting is how all this gets fixed.

                          Alf No ProblemA This user is from outside of this forum
                          Alf No ProblemA This user is from outside of this forum
                          Alf No Problem
                          wrote last edited by
                          #26

                          @agreeable_landfall @benroyce @juergen_hubert @cascheranno
                          Vote? Definitely!
                          Doesn't make a difference.
                          The rich buy politicians on both sides; no matter who gets elected, the rich get richer and I am poorer.
                          Why are they spending money on elections? Cost of doing business. To maintain the farce so the oppressed do not revolt.
                          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oiTJ7Pz_59A
                          James Talarico: "The culture wars are a smoke screen, because the real fight in this country is not Left versus Right; it's Top versus Bottom."

                          Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡©B 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • A slash

                            @benroyce @juergen_hubert @cascheranno

                            My take: You vote counts. If that were not true, why would they (both parties) spend so much time and money trying to stop you? They want a low turnout, because it's easier to tip an election that way.

                            The solution is obvious: Vote. I will tell you now; I don't care *who* you vote for. Just as long as you vote.

                            Want to do more? Volunteer to help folks get to the polls. Whatever gets the most people voting is how all this gets fixed.

                            Grassroots JoeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                            Grassroots JoeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                            Grassroots Joe
                            wrote last edited by
                            #27

                            @agreeable_landfall

                            Since when do both parties want to stop people from voting?

                            @benroyce @juergen_hubert @cascheranno

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • Alf No ProblemA Alf No Problem

                              @agreeable_landfall @benroyce @juergen_hubert @cascheranno
                              Vote? Definitely!
                              Doesn't make a difference.
                              The rich buy politicians on both sides; no matter who gets elected, the rich get richer and I am poorer.
                              Why are they spending money on elections? Cost of doing business. To maintain the farce so the oppressed do not revolt.
                              https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oiTJ7Pz_59A
                              James Talarico: "The culture wars are a smoke screen, because the real fight in this country is not Left versus Right; it's Top versus Bottom."

                              Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡©B This user is from outside of this forum
                              Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡©B This user is from outside of this forum
                              Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡©
                              wrote last edited by
                              #28

                              @AlfNoProblem @agreeable_landfall @juergen_hubert @cascheranno

                              if you don't believe a vote makes a difference why would you vote?

                              so you're a useless cynic and not even being coherent

                              the reality is a vote does matter and does make a difference

                              pick a fucking lane

                              and please do not cite talarico. you're betraying his message. a vote for him is a vote for change. you know this. if you want to support talarico, which i'm glad you do, work on your sales pitch

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • A slash

                                @benroyce @juergen_hubert @cascheranno

                                My take: You vote counts. If that were not true, why would they (both parties) spend so much time and money trying to stop you? They want a low turnout, because it's easier to tip an election that way.

                                The solution is obvious: Vote. I will tell you now; I don't care *who* you vote for. Just as long as you vote.

                                Want to do more? Volunteer to help folks get to the polls. Whatever gets the most people voting is how all this gets fixed.

                                Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡©B This user is from outside of this forum
                                Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡©B This user is from outside of this forum
                                Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡©
                                wrote last edited by
                                #29

                                @agreeable_landfall @juergen_hubert @cascheranno

                                "(both parties)"

                                you're going to have to explain how you came to that conclusion

                                "I don't care *who* you vote for"

                                i do. if someone votes MAGA they're a piece of shit

                                but yes: vote. i can support any pro-voting message

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • JΓΌrgen HubertJ JΓΌrgen Hubert

                                  To the #VoteBlue people in the USA: Yes, voting for the #Democrats _is_ necessary in all upcoming elections. But you also need to realize that the anger at the Democratic Party establishment is both real and entirely justified, and you should understand where that anger is coming from.

                                  To quote the "Letter from a Birmingham Jail":

                                  'First, I must confess that over the past few years I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro’s great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen’s Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to β€œorder” than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says: β€œI agree with you in the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action”; who paternalistically believes he can set the timetable for another man’s freedom; who lives by a mythical concept of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait for a β€œmore convenient season.”'

                                  https://letterfromjail.com/

                                  rusty_shacklefordR This user is from outside of this forum
                                  rusty_shacklefordR This user is from outside of this forum
                                  rusty_shackleford
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #30
                                  @juergen_hubert We will never break the 2 party system if we don't start voting for people we actually like, instead of trying to vote strategically against people we don't.

                                  The 2 deeply corrupt major parties rely on this strategic voting behavior to stay in power. You are being duped.
                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡©B Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡©

                                    @juergen_hubert

                                    a focus on the dem estbmnt is a red herring

                                    of course they suck

                                    #mamdani showed us just show up and #vote for who we like. he got no support from the estbmnt, even hostility. now he's mayor

                                    because we voted!

                                    the dem estbmnt is not going to change. does it matter? why should we care?

                                    1. ignore them

                                    2. vote

                                    *especially #primaries #primaries2026*

                                    3. and replace them

                                    et voila

                                    voter anger is not the fault of #democrats

                                    the dems being shit is the fault of people not voting

                                    JΓΌrgen HubertJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    JΓΌrgen HubertJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    JΓΌrgen Hubert
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #31

                                    @benroyce

                                    Yeah, voting in the primaries is one of the most important paths for change in the USA, although I think this should be accompanied by political action groups independent of the political parties. Political leaders need to fear voters even outside of the campaign seasons.

                                    Though I do think only blaming voters for "not voting" misses the mark a bit. The US election system offers methods for vote manipulation and Big Money influences that are inconceivable in most democratic countries. The "will of the voters" has a massive structural disadvantage in the USA, and this has been the case from the start.

                                    Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡©B 1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    0
                                    • JΓΌrgen HubertJ JΓΌrgen Hubert

                                      @benroyce

                                      Yeah, voting in the primaries is one of the most important paths for change in the USA, although I think this should be accompanied by political action groups independent of the political parties. Political leaders need to fear voters even outside of the campaign seasons.

                                      Though I do think only blaming voters for "not voting" misses the mark a bit. The US election system offers methods for vote manipulation and Big Money influences that are inconceivable in most democratic countries. The "will of the voters" has a massive structural disadvantage in the USA, and this has been the case from the start.

                                      Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡©B This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡©B This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡©
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #32

                                      @juergen_hubert

                                      you delineate the problem accurately

                                      i'm describing the solution

                                      which is we vote

                                      what is the point of giving fascists what they want by not voting?

                                      and what is the value of honoring convoluted self-defeating rationalizations against the thing that is the solution for our problems?

                                      i love that MLK quote

                                      thing is, MLK would be telling us to vote

                                      and be shaking his head at those not voting, because such people are a flavor of what he is complaining about in the quote

                                      JΓΌrgen HubertJ 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡©B Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡©

                                        @juergen_hubert

                                        you delineate the problem accurately

                                        i'm describing the solution

                                        which is we vote

                                        what is the point of giving fascists what they want by not voting?

                                        and what is the value of honoring convoluted self-defeating rationalizations against the thing that is the solution for our problems?

                                        i love that MLK quote

                                        thing is, MLK would be telling us to vote

                                        and be shaking his head at those not voting, because such people are a flavor of what he is complaining about in the quote

                                        JΓΌrgen HubertJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                        JΓΌrgen HubertJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                        JΓΌrgen Hubert
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #33

                                        @benroyce

                                        I never said that people should not vote. Voting is one of the most key parts of a comprehensive political action strategy that brings actual change.

                                        My point is that voting _in itself_ is not enough. Progressive forces must be out there all the time, in public, demanding change, and calling out groups and people who block progress. Or else the political establishment will reassert itself. Because _their_ lobbyists are active all the time, too.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        0
                                        Reply
                                        • Reply as topic
                                        Log in to reply
                                        • Oldest to Newest
                                        • Newest to Oldest
                                        • Most Votes


                                        • Login

                                        • Don't have an account? Register

                                        • Login or register to search.
                                        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                        • First post
                                          Last post
                                        0
                                        • Categories
                                        • Recent
                                        • Tags
                                        • Popular
                                        • World
                                        • Users
                                        • Groups