Let's remind everyone what a safe internet actually means.

@Tutanota Does your solution support open standards like POP/IMAP, allowing the end users to encrypt/decrypt/verify their messages EXTERNALLY? If it does not, please stop using the word "safe" and the name of your product in the same sentence.

@xela @Tutanota

Yes that is very important but you have to get supported by Sorting and showing important content that has to be moderated. So you have to use as Mod some tools to sort that content and Moderate that content in a propper way. Floods of Content could be worse to handle if it is too much for one Person. So you have to get Tools to Rank the Worst Post to the Top and less worse to the bottom if you handle really lots of Content. That is possible to get and will help to Mod Content.

@dynom @Tutanota

this laws you are referencing are the problem of unsafe acting on that harassment and victims you are referencing to. This laws will get it worse on victims because of stigmata on that topic. You have to reform that law before you could get victims safer. You have to get safer NSFW stuff before you kick out the really bad stuff. To ban everything that does not suit you is double standard.

@Tutanota
I’ve been using unique 20-char random passwords for at least five years. Occasionally, I’ve run into a site where the limit is lower, and then I’ve thought a bit about whether I really need an account at such a poorly coded site. Nope!

@Chris2000SP sure, totally agree, moderation needs tools. But humans must have "the last say".
Anyway, why I mentioned moderation here was, because it's not mentioned at all in the info graphic for a safer web - and I think, it should be there. @Tutanota

@xela @Tutanota
of course humans must have the last say! I will not tolerate a Moderation that force overblocking.

@Tutanota we will ditch smart phones and services. Time to use dump keypad phones just for calls and msgs.. Lest flick these stupid companies together..

@GOKUSHRM @Tutanota
How about a real Linux Phone instead of using a phone that is from last millennium? True Linux Phones does not have that Problems i also perceive on "Normal Smartphones"

@TCatInReality
There is no ownership of internet. There is ownership on internet.
The left column is for safety on internet protecting against abuse by systems on internet under any ownership.
@Tutanota

@Tutanota

@Tutanota You keep using the word safer. I do not think it means what you think it means.

@Tutanota

#alttext

A safer internet IS MADE BY
Encryption
Privacy
Open source

A safer internet is NOT MADE BY
Age verification
Scanning communication
Tracking & data collection

#SAFERINTERNETDAY

@drewtowler @Tutanota

Please get some more context if you want to discus that topic because such comments are not helping if your sentences are to vage.

@gonun13 @Tutanota Correct, it is only mutual exclusive to privacy.

@soderling No, it is not. Any digital service could query a digital gov ID just for age verification (yes/no signed key) and nothing else is stored in either side. A government audit can run on all users just to make sure they have those signed keys WITHOUT knowing who they are.

@Tutanota why age verification is not safe? Internet should be 35+ only. Because it destroys brain tissues with cat pictures.

@SuperDicq @Tutanota no. NOT free. Secure software is funded software that can afford to invest in a secure platform.

@Tutanota the left column does not protect minors from AI Fake content, porn and violence. This is just the wrong sharepic for the conext

@aubrey @soderling They can save it, it's pointless, it's just a valid age verification token. The critical point is the authentication system that by law and governance, would be made in a way where you only authorise an age verification not sharing private data with the digital service OR logging on the government side what site you're trying to use. There are more technical steps available for privacy like key pairs, blockchain, owning your data I would prefer first but it is possible.

@gonun13 @soderling Well, then the government gives me a token for something. First, they know I requested a token at this time (which is also a privacy problem, but not that big). I give that token to the site I want to use, that is okay still. But then the government asks the site owner to give them all the users with all their tokens. Now the government can match the users with real people based on the tokens they gave out.