Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Today in InfoSec Job Security News:

Today in InfoSec Job Security News:

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
133 Posts 102 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Kevin BeaumontG Kevin Beaumont

    Today in InfoSec Job Security News:

    I was looking into an obvious ../.. vulnerability introduced into a major web framework today, and it was committed by username Claude on GitHub. Vibe coded, basically.

    So I started looking through Claude commits on GitHub, there’s over 2m of them and it’s about 5% of all open source code this month.

    https://github.com/search?q=author%3Aclaude&type=commits&s=author-date&o=desc

    As I looked through the code I saw the same class of vulns being introduced over, and over, again - several a minute.

    Todd KnarrT This user is from outside of this forum
    Todd KnarrT This user is from outside of this forum
    Todd Knarr
    wrote last edited by
    #80

    @GossiTheDog I think @timbray might be interested in that too.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Kevin BeaumontG Kevin Beaumont

      Today in InfoSec Job Security News:

      I was looking into an obvious ../.. vulnerability introduced into a major web framework today, and it was committed by username Claude on GitHub. Vibe coded, basically.

      So I started looking through Claude commits on GitHub, there’s over 2m of them and it’s about 5% of all open source code this month.

      https://github.com/search?q=author%3Aclaude&type=commits&s=author-date&o=desc

      As I looked through the code I saw the same class of vulns being introduced over, and over, again - several a minute.

      G This user is from outside of this forum
      G This user is from outside of this forum
      Atomic Orbitals
      wrote last edited by
      #81

      @GossiTheDog Not just bad vibes, but the *same* bad vibes repeated endlessly!

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • C64WhizC C64Whiz

        @GossiTheDog

        Makes me wonder if this is a effort by "closed source" to disrupt/poison/discredit open source? 🤔

        KiernianK This user is from outside of this forum
        KiernianK This user is from outside of this forum
        Kiernian
        wrote last edited by
        #82

        @c64whiz @GossiTheDog
        This was honestly my first thought.

        The vast majority of the tv-news-watching public barely understands computers as it is through no real fault of their own as they have been spoonfed "magic and mystery" since the dialup days.

        The distinction of "open source = MORE dangerous than big company software" would be very easy for a front of united major media outlets owned by a handful rich folks to spread and most people will not be equipped to tell facts from misinformation.

        How well have those open source legal protections been working against the "smart TV" industry? I'd bet every TV holding shelf I hit at Wal-Mart will be stocked with misappropriated GPL code and no source distribution.

        This is the same tactic major corps use to obtain IP for themselves.

        Lock up the originator in tedious, costly busywork (typically legal, claiming infringement to start a costly time-consuming trial, for most corps) and then when the originator can't handle it and collapse under the weight of it all, the corps take the product as their own.

        Tying up repos with vulnerabilities that might not get noticed just might work out well for the major software outfits in the long run.

        It's reprehensible and a little more haphazard, but it sure looks awfully familiar.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Kevin BeaumontG Kevin Beaumont

          Today in InfoSec Job Security News:

          I was looking into an obvious ../.. vulnerability introduced into a major web framework today, and it was committed by username Claude on GitHub. Vibe coded, basically.

          So I started looking through Claude commits on GitHub, there’s over 2m of them and it’s about 5% of all open source code this month.

          https://github.com/search?q=author%3Aclaude&type=commits&s=author-date&o=desc

          As I looked through the code I saw the same class of vulns being introduced over, and over, again - several a minute.

          Steve HerseyN This user is from outside of this forum
          Steve HerseyN This user is from outside of this forum
          Steve Hersey
          wrote last edited by
          #83

          @GossiTheDog
          Aaaahhh!
          Who is giving clankers commit privileges to their repositories? Seems like an obvious failure of project management.

          crazyeddieC 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Keith LawsonK Keith Lawson

            @GossiTheDog This was literally the first major security mistake I made in my early days as a Perl developer and I don't imagine it's that uncommon. Claude has probably been trained with a truckload of code with these vulnerabilities.

            That's okay because we run everything in single-purpose Docker containers now though, right? /s

            Steve HerseyN This user is from outside of this forum
            Steve HerseyN This user is from outside of this forum
            Steve Hersey
            wrote last edited by
            #84

            @keith_lawson @GossiTheDog

            I keep pointing out to my coworkers that these clankers are trained on StackOverflow posts that contain code examples followed by "here's what I wrote, why doesn't it work?"

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Kevin BeaumontG Kevin Beaumont

              Today in InfoSec Job Security News:

              I was looking into an obvious ../.. vulnerability introduced into a major web framework today, and it was committed by username Claude on GitHub. Vibe coded, basically.

              So I started looking through Claude commits on GitHub, there’s over 2m of them and it’s about 5% of all open source code this month.

              https://github.com/search?q=author%3Aclaude&type=commits&s=author-date&o=desc

              As I looked through the code I saw the same class of vulns being introduced over, and over, again - several a minute.

              crypticrainfallC This user is from outside of this forum
              crypticrainfallC This user is from outside of this forum
              crypticrainfall
              wrote last edited by
              #85

              This is just starting to sound like a cyber attack.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Kevin BeaumontG Kevin Beaumont

                Today in InfoSec Job Security News:

                I was looking into an obvious ../.. vulnerability introduced into a major web framework today, and it was committed by username Claude on GitHub. Vibe coded, basically.

                So I started looking through Claude commits on GitHub, there’s over 2m of them and it’s about 5% of all open source code this month.

                https://github.com/search?q=author%3Aclaude&type=commits&s=author-date&o=desc

                As I looked through the code I saw the same class of vulns being introduced over, and over, again - several a minute.

                gmooreG This user is from outside of this forum
                gmooreG This user is from outside of this forum
                gmoore
                wrote last edited by
                #86

                @GossiTheDog This kind of basic stuff is easily caught by any free static analysis tool. There's no excuse to not be running one in one's repo, vibe-coded or not.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • BrianD Brian

                  @da_667 @GossiTheDog I wish that juice actually existed...

                  crazyeddieC This user is from outside of this forum
                  crazyeddieC This user is from outside of this forum
                  crazyeddie
                  wrote last edited by
                  #87

                  @Drat @da_667 @GossiTheDog It does. In the form I was really fond of it's $50 per 750 ml and makes you say stupid shit like, "GASP...that's really smooth...." and then shove your head up your ass.

                  But I'm actually sick to death of that kind of oblivion. The shit I have to unsee just keeps adding up as does the shame of letting shit pass by unopposed.

                  Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩B 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • crazyeddieC crazyeddie

                    @Drat @da_667 @GossiTheDog It does. In the form I was really fond of it's $50 per 750 ml and makes you say stupid shit like, "GASP...that's really smooth...." and then shove your head up your ass.

                    But I'm actually sick to death of that kind of oblivion. The shit I have to unsee just keeps adding up as does the shame of letting shit pass by unopposed.

                    Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩B This user is from outside of this forum
                    Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩B This user is from outside of this forum
                    Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩
                    wrote last edited by
                    #88

                    @crazyeddie @Drat @da_667 @GossiTheDog

                    strangely poetic

                    and absolutely true

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Steve HerseyN Steve Hersey

                      @GossiTheDog
                      Aaaahhh!
                      Who is giving clankers commit privileges to their repositories? Seems like an obvious failure of project management.

                      crazyeddieC This user is from outside of this forum
                      crazyeddieC This user is from outside of this forum
                      crazyeddie
                      wrote last edited by
                      #89

                      @n1xnx @GossiTheDog Especially earlier in my career, I could easily have been taken in by thinking I'm getting actual help from a "friend" who wants to join me on the project and I'd have not really looked into it too much.

                      A lot of these projects are just peoples' hobbies that blow up...you know, or fail to. When they do blow up the developer(s) can end up severely overworked and frankly inexperienced for dealing with the management part.

                      So yeah...this is going to be a disaster.

                      Steve HerseyN 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • fuzzyfuzzyfungusF fuzzyfuzzyfungus

                        @draeath @badsamurai @da_667 @GossiTheDog That's what amazes me about the "hallucinated citations" stories. Making bots not hallucinate is certainly not readily feasible, quite possible infeasible in practice; but just checking citations one at a time for existence would have been cutting edge in maybe the 1960s. Why is anyone skipping such trivial cleanup steps when using a known-unreliable tool?

                        F This user is from outside of this forum
                        F This user is from outside of this forum
                        Fooker
                        wrote last edited by
                        #90

                        @fuzzyfuzzyfungus is the question not more "why is anyone using such unreliable tools in the first place?" They've proven time and time again that the result is less than sub par, they create as many if not more issues than they fix, they've fucked up ram prices and soon storage prices, they use too much energy.. i could go on but fuck, if that's not enough i don't know what to say.

                        Gaëtan PerraultG 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • crazyeddieC crazyeddie

                          @n1xnx @GossiTheDog Especially earlier in my career, I could easily have been taken in by thinking I'm getting actual help from a "friend" who wants to join me on the project and I'd have not really looked into it too much.

                          A lot of these projects are just peoples' hobbies that blow up...you know, or fail to. When they do blow up the developer(s) can end up severely overworked and frankly inexperienced for dealing with the management part.

                          So yeah...this is going to be a disaster.

                          Steve HerseyN This user is from outside of this forum
                          Steve HerseyN This user is from outside of this forum
                          Steve Hersey
                          wrote last edited by
                          #91

                          @crazyeddie @GossiTheDog
                          Sigh. Yes, that makes perfect sense.

                          I remember reading commentary back in the 1980s to the effect that automating a (business) process doesn't make it BETTER, it just makes its existing failure modes happen FASTER, often with the result that the humans who were able to cope with those failures when they came at a human rate are now overwhelmed by them occurring at the speed of computer processing.

                          It was true then for paper-based accounting, and it's true now for collaborative software projects.

                          M 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Kevin BeaumontG Kevin Beaumont

                            Today in InfoSec Job Security News:

                            I was looking into an obvious ../.. vulnerability introduced into a major web framework today, and it was committed by username Claude on GitHub. Vibe coded, basically.

                            So I started looking through Claude commits on GitHub, there’s over 2m of them and it’s about 5% of all open source code this month.

                            https://github.com/search?q=author%3Aclaude&type=commits&s=author-date&o=desc

                            As I looked through the code I saw the same class of vulns being introduced over, and over, again - several a minute.

                            scyS This user is from outside of this forum
                            scyS This user is from outside of this forum
                            scy
                            wrote last edited by
                            #92

                            @GossiTheDog But think about the AI-powered "security researchers". They can now use their AI models to find these vulnerabilities and create 8.2 severity issues to fix it again.

                            It's like that picture with the circular economy between Nvidia and OpenAI and Microsoft, but with 0days!

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • vlkrV vlkr

                              @GossiTheDog https://github.com/claude right now showing "Something went wrong, please refresh the page to try again." Yeah, dude.

                              crazyeddieC This user is from outside of this forum
                              crazyeddieC This user is from outside of this forum
                              crazyeddie
                              wrote last edited by
                              #93

                              @vlkr @GossiTheDog I get the same behavior here and can go to other profiles just fine 😛

                              No public repos. Something went wrong.

                              I guess it could just be that I picked a particularly irrelevant profile to compare against but it did show up just fine without any error.

                              Could also be that it's too sudden a shift in interest in that particular user.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • da_667D da_667

                                @GossiTheDog what's funny to me, is that there were influencers on linkedin a few days ago claiming claudecode could find vulnerabilities in code faster than humans, and they're like "look at all these openssl vulns it found!" now I'm like. "well no shit its finding vulnerabilities, when its the one introducing them."

                                Ray—Golden Retriever Whisperer—🔝InsightsZ This user is from outside of this forum
                                Ray—Golden Retriever Whisperer—🔝InsightsZ This user is from outside of this forum
                                Ray—Golden Retriever Whisperer—🔝Insights
                                wrote last edited by
                                #94

                                @da_667 @GossiTheDog and I’ve been seeing several posts in the past 48 hours that say that A”I” vuln scanners aren’t finding most of them.

                                Almost makes me wonder if there’s a two-pronged attack here. Introduce them and ignore them.

                                Chris JohnsonC 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • da_667D da_667

                                  @GossiTheDog ladies and gentlemen, it's this stupid shit (tm) that we are paying up the ass for new SSDs and RAM for.

                                  Ray—Golden Retriever Whisperer—🔝InsightsZ This user is from outside of this forum
                                  Ray—Golden Retriever Whisperer—🔝InsightsZ This user is from outside of this forum
                                  Ray—Golden Retriever Whisperer—🔝Insights
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #95

                                  @da_667 @GossiTheDog I have 5 500MB HDDs that are now probably worth thousands.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • Kevin BeaumontG Kevin Beaumont

                                    Today in InfoSec Job Security News:

                                    I was looking into an obvious ../.. vulnerability introduced into a major web framework today, and it was committed by username Claude on GitHub. Vibe coded, basically.

                                    So I started looking through Claude commits on GitHub, there’s over 2m of them and it’s about 5% of all open source code this month.

                                    https://github.com/search?q=author%3Aclaude&type=commits&s=author-date&o=desc

                                    As I looked through the code I saw the same class of vulns being introduced over, and over, again - several a minute.

                                    W This user is from outside of this forum
                                    W This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Wouter De Borger
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #96

                                    @GossiTheDog could you explain what the vulnerability is?

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • FennixF Fennix

                                      @thomasfuchs @GossiTheDog

                                      I mean, if climate change becomes fixed eventually there won't be any more cancer, so they aren't completely wrong.

                                      Pier HegemanP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Pier HegemanP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Pier Hegeman
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #97

                                      @fennix @thomasfuchs @GossiTheDog If climate change is not fixed there will also be no more cancer.

                                      FennixF 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • da_667D da_667

                                        @GossiTheDog what's funny to me, is that there were influencers on linkedin a few days ago claiming claudecode could find vulnerabilities in code faster than humans, and they're like "look at all these openssl vulns it found!" now I'm like. "well no shit its finding vulnerabilities, when its the one introducing them."

                                        bellegraylaneB This user is from outside of this forum
                                        bellegraylaneB This user is from outside of this forum
                                        bellegraylane
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #98

                                        @da_667 @GossiTheDog every single arsonist would love to be a fireman. Now with Claude you can too. Lol

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • Kevin BeaumontG Kevin Beaumont

                                          Today in InfoSec Job Security News:

                                          I was looking into an obvious ../.. vulnerability introduced into a major web framework today, and it was committed by username Claude on GitHub. Vibe coded, basically.

                                          So I started looking through Claude commits on GitHub, there’s over 2m of them and it’s about 5% of all open source code this month.

                                          https://github.com/search?q=author%3Aclaude&type=commits&s=author-date&o=desc

                                          As I looked through the code I saw the same class of vulns being introduced over, and over, again - several a minute.

                                          random thoughtsH This user is from outside of this forum
                                          random thoughtsH This user is from outside of this forum
                                          random thoughts
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #99

                                          @GossiTheDog
                                          This is more and more feels like a coordinated attack on FOSS by the big software.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups