Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. What the actual fuck.

What the actual fuck.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
59 Posts 43 Posters 67 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

    What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

    Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

    https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

    España BizarraE This user is from outside of this forum
    España BizarraE This user is from outside of this forum
    España Bizarra
    wrote last edited by
    #4

    @sundogplanets So now Musk wants to jump in the data center wagon, so he can get VC funding. Too late, that bubble will burst this very same year.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

      What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

      Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

      https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

      kwayk42K This user is from outside of this forum
      kwayk42K This user is from outside of this forum
      kwayk42
      wrote last edited by
      #5

      @sundogplanets that's it... Imma build a rail gun that can shoot down those satellites

      Doug WadeD mkjM CyC 3 Replies Last reply
      0
      • kwayk42K kwayk42

        @sundogplanets that's it... Imma build a rail gun that can shoot down those satellites

        Doug WadeD This user is from outside of this forum
        Doug WadeD This user is from outside of this forum
        Doug Wade
        wrote last edited by
        #6

        @kwayk42 @sundogplanets I love the enthusiasm but that would be speed running Kessler syndrome

        kwayk42K 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • CarolynC Carolyn

          @sundogplanets The FCC is corrupt. What I don’t understand is how US gets to decide this for the world. 😞

          EyeG This user is from outside of this forum
          EyeG This user is from outside of this forum
          Eye
          wrote last edited by
          #7

          @CStamp @sundogplanets

          This!

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Doug WadeD Doug Wade

            @kwayk42 @sundogplanets I love the enthusiasm but that would be speed running Kessler syndrome

            kwayk42K This user is from outside of this forum
            kwayk42K This user is from outside of this forum
            kwayk42
            wrote last edited by
            #8

            @dougwade @sundogplanets so... I should design incendiary rounds is what you're saying?

            At this point the only way out is through, unless someone wants to build giant nets to try and clean up space debris

            SpycrabS 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

              What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

              Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

              https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

              SpycrabS This user is from outside of this forum
              SpycrabS This user is from outside of this forum
              Spycrab
              wrote last edited by
              #9

              @sundogplanets need more deorbit star link propaganda

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

                mkjM This user is from outside of this forum
                mkjM This user is from outside of this forum
                mkj
                wrote last edited by
                #10

                @sundogplanets One… million… satellites!? 🤯

                Even ignoring all the *other* issues…

                I imagine those wouldn't exactly be tiny cubesats. So how does 30 per launch sound? Build enough of those satellites and launchers to maintain a launch cadence of one launch per day, and that kind of a constellation is *90 years off* per my calculator. Assuming no failed launches and no failures in-orbit and no replacements needed for that time, naturally. And they'll cram all that into sun-synch orbits? WTAF?

                mkjM 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                  "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step toward becoming a Kardashev II-level situation"

                  THIS IS IN AN FCC FILING NOT A SCIENCE FICTION NOVEL WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK I'M DEAD

                  Kiloku - Secretário do CaosK This user is from outside of this forum
                  Kiloku - Secretário do CaosK This user is from outside of this forum
                  Kiloku - Secretário do Caos
                  wrote last edited by
                  #11

                  @sundogplanets not that it matters, but it also wouldn't budge a thing in the kardashev scale, as it's supposed to measure how much power civilization can harness, and they certainly would pale in comparison to the total amount of earth based computing power, not to mention all the power used in non-computing usage

                  Michael BuschM 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • kwayk42K kwayk42

                    @dougwade @sundogplanets so... I should design incendiary rounds is what you're saying?

                    At this point the only way out is through, unless someone wants to build giant nets to try and clean up space debris

                    SpycrabS This user is from outside of this forum
                    SpycrabS This user is from outside of this forum
                    Spycrab
                    wrote last edited by
                    #12

                    @kwayk42 @dougwade @sundogplanets um actually, giant nets are a order of magnitude better idea that shooting satellites. Grapple arms and foam are also options. /srs

                    kwayk42K 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • kwayk42K kwayk42

                      @sundogplanets that's it... Imma build a rail gun that can shoot down those satellites

                      mkjM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mkjM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mkj
                      wrote last edited by
                      #13

                      @kwayk42 Nudge one a kilometer off position and hello our old friend Kessler.

                      @sundogplanets

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • SpycrabS Spycrab

                        @kwayk42 @dougwade @sundogplanets um actually, giant nets are a order of magnitude better idea that shooting satellites. Grapple arms and foam are also options. /srs

                        kwayk42K This user is from outside of this forum
                        kwayk42K This user is from outside of this forum
                        kwayk42
                        wrote last edited by
                        #14

                        @spycrab @dougwade @sundogplanets but I can still shoot them once they're caught in a net though right?

                        #JustWannaBuildARailgun

                        🍋 Superball ☀️S SpycrabS 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • Ángela Stella MatutinaA This user is from outside of this forum
                          Ángela Stella MatutinaA This user is from outside of this forum
                          Ángela Stella Matutina
                          wrote last edited by
                          #15

                          @pthenq1 @sundogplanets

                          The sunrise/sunset line is the terminator. So, Sun-synchronous (i.e., passes every day at the same local solar time) LEO on the plane of the terminator.

                          Whatever it's called, it's a horrible idea. Want a ringed planet, you know where to find it. One of these days they will come up with a clever (?) plan to dismantle the Moon to give old Earth a ring too... until the rocks start colliding with each other and decaying into our atmosphere.

                          MycotropicM 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • mkjM mkj

                            @sundogplanets One… million… satellites!? 🤯

                            Even ignoring all the *other* issues…

                            I imagine those wouldn't exactly be tiny cubesats. So how does 30 per launch sound? Build enough of those satellites and launchers to maintain a launch cadence of one launch per day, and that kind of a constellation is *90 years off* per my calculator. Assuming no failed launches and no failures in-orbit and no replacements needed for that time, naturally. And they'll cram all that into sun-synch orbits? WTAF?

                            mkjM This user is from outside of this forum
                            mkjM This user is from outside of this forum
                            mkj
                            wrote last edited by
                            #16

                            I really can't help but feel that someone, somewhere, saw the term "megaconstellation" and said "let's have an *actual* mega-constellation!"

                            @sundogplanets

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                              "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step toward becoming a Kardashev II-level situation"

                              THIS IS IN AN FCC FILING NOT A SCIENCE FICTION NOVEL WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK I'M DEAD

                              RootWyrm 🇺🇦:progress:R This user is from outside of this forum
                              RootWyrm 🇺🇦:progress:R This user is from outside of this forum
                              RootWyrm 🇺🇦:progress:
                              wrote last edited by
                              #17

                              @sundogplanets I would ask if you were fucking serious and why the FCC hasn't thrown it out, but calling the people left there "clownshoes" is an unforgivable insult to the footwear of professional entertainers.

                              Also, worth noting, that isn't even fucking *ZERO* on the Kardashev because that's not even a goddamn relevant scale. Please somebody start fucking executing these techbro oligarchs to save the rest of us.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                                What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                                Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                                https://au.pcmag.com/networking/115649/spacex-eyes-1-million-satellites-for-orbital-data-center-push

                                Hugh FergusonH This user is from outside of this forum
                                Hugh FergusonH This user is from outside of this forum
                                Hugh Ferguson
                                wrote last edited by
                                #18

                                @sundogplanets at this number of satellites, we're in the domain where the Russians and Chinese might start shooting them down as they would take up orbital real estate for their own networks to compete with Starlink

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • kwayk42K kwayk42

                                  @spycrab @dougwade @sundogplanets but I can still shoot them once they're caught in a net though right?

                                  #JustWannaBuildARailgun

                                  🍋 Superball ☀️S This user is from outside of this forum
                                  🍋 Superball ☀️S This user is from outside of this forum
                                  🍋 Superball ☀️
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #19

                                  @kwayk42 🤭🤍

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                                    "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step toward becoming a Kardashev II-level situation"

                                    THIS IS IN AN FCC FILING NOT A SCIENCE FICTION NOVEL WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK I'M DEAD

                                    schrotthaufenS This user is from outside of this forum
                                    schrotthaufenS This user is from outside of this forum
                                    schrotthaufen
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #20

                                    @sundogplanets They will absolutely rubber stamp it. The orange dictator will see to it.

                                    John Faithfull 🌍🇪🇺🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🧡✊🏻✊🏿F RiaResistsR 2 Replies Last reply
                                    0
                                    • schrotthaufenS schrotthaufen

                                      @sundogplanets They will absolutely rubber stamp it. The orange dictator will see to it.

                                      John Faithfull 🌍🇪🇺🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🧡✊🏻✊🏿F This user is from outside of this forum
                                      John Faithfull 🌍🇪🇺🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🧡✊🏻✊🏿F This user is from outside of this forum
                                      John Faithfull 🌍🇪🇺🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🧡✊🏻✊🏿
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #21

                                      @schrotthaufen @sundogplanets 😭🤬

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • CarolynC Carolyn

                                        @sundogplanets The FCC is corrupt. What I don’t understand is how US gets to decide this for the world. 😞

                                        DaveyD This user is from outside of this forum
                                        DaveyD This user is from outside of this forum
                                        Davey
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #22

                                        @CStamp @sundogplanets

                                        "Because FUCK the rest of the world" - USA

                                        (Always has been)

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • kwayk42K kwayk42

                                          @spycrab @dougwade @sundogplanets but I can still shoot them once they're caught in a net though right?

                                          #JustWannaBuildARailgun

                                          SpycrabS This user is from outside of this forum
                                          SpycrabS This user is from outside of this forum
                                          Spycrab
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #23

                                          @kwayk42 @dougwade @sundogplanets if you shoot them they become a hazard for everything up there.

                                          What's worse than a million starlinks
                                          Several billion in trackable small starlinks

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups