Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Well, everyone, you can now submit a comment to let the FCC know what you think about SpaceX asking for 1 million satellites for "AI datacenters" whatever the fuck that means.

Well, everyone, you can now submit a comment to let the FCC know what you think about SpaceX asking for 1 million satellites for "AI datacenters" whatever the fuck that means.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
84 Posts 66 Posters 160 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

    If anyone has time and energy to set up instructions for how to submit a comment to the FCC (it's really fucking complicated, on purpose, I'm sure), I would very much appreciate it! Otherwise I'll do it in the coming days.

    teresa_athomeT This user is from outside of this forum
    teresa_athomeT This user is from outside of this forum
    teresa_athome
    wrote last edited by
    #10

    @sundogplanets There's a walkthrough here: https://e-ratecentral.com/Resources/Educational-Information/Guide-to-Reading-and-Filing-FCC-Comments

    SunnJax 🥾🏳️‍🌈 :Fire_Pride:S 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

      Well, everyone, you can now submit a comment to let the FCC know what you think about SpaceX asking for 1 million satellites for "AI datacenters" whatever the fuck that means.

      https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-26-113A1.pdf

      Comments due March 6.

      I am having a very hard time believing this is really happening. Fuck you, SpaceX, and fuck you, FCC. This is not regulation, this is a fucking joke, that will destroy our ability to use satellites for centuries.

      JamesB192J This user is from outside of this forum
      JamesB192J This user is from outside of this forum
      JamesB192
      wrote last edited by
      #11

      @sundogplanets let me marh this badly...

      At a launch a second they could have that sucker up in months. At a launch every hour it'd take more than a century. At a launch a day millenia. Assuming of course one satellite per launch. That's just the getting to orbit bit. Fabbing the satellites might well take longer. After of course the lead time to ensure hallucinating chatbots are not on the worse granola.

      mkjM 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • R ActivityRelay shared this topic
      • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

        Well, everyone, you can now submit a comment to let the FCC know what you think about SpaceX asking for 1 million satellites for "AI datacenters" whatever the fuck that means.

        https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-26-113A1.pdf

        Comments due March 6.

        I am having a very hard time believing this is really happening. Fuck you, SpaceX, and fuck you, FCC. This is not regulation, this is a fucking joke, that will destroy our ability to use satellites for centuries.

        CM ThiedeC This user is from outside of this forum
        CM ThiedeC This user is from outside of this forum
        CM Thiede
        wrote last edited by
        #12

        @sundogplanets now he wants to corner the market on the sun's rays

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

          Well, everyone, you can now submit a comment to let the FCC know what you think about SpaceX asking for 1 million satellites for "AI datacenters" whatever the fuck that means.

          https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-26-113A1.pdf

          Comments due March 6.

          I am having a very hard time believing this is really happening. Fuck you, SpaceX, and fuck you, FCC. This is not regulation, this is a fucking joke, that will destroy our ability to use satellites for centuries.

          Nonya Bidniss :CIAverified: 🇺🇸N This user is from outside of this forum
          Nonya Bidniss :CIAverified: 🇺🇸N This user is from outside of this forum
          Nonya Bidniss :CIAverified: 🇺🇸
          wrote last edited by
          #13

          @sundogplanets Maybe that's what it's going to take to teach the world and especially the U.S. that the billionaires should have been loaded onto a rocket and shot right into the fucking sun

          Petra van CronenburgN 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

            Well, everyone, you can now submit a comment to let the FCC know what you think about SpaceX asking for 1 million satellites for "AI datacenters" whatever the fuck that means.

            https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-26-113A1.pdf

            Comments due March 6.

            I am having a very hard time believing this is really happening. Fuck you, SpaceX, and fuck you, FCC. This is not regulation, this is a fucking joke, that will destroy our ability to use satellites for centuries.

            Eric LawtonE This user is from outside of this forum
            Eric LawtonE This user is from outside of this forum
            Eric Lawton
            wrote last edited by
            #14

            @sundogplanets

            I appreciate any Americans that submit a complaint, but who exactly gave an American regulatory body authority over the whole of low Earth orbit and beyond?

            Colonial theft.

            @PhoenixSerenity

            Petra van CronenburgN SibylleS Richard W. Woodley ELBOWS UP    🇨🇦🌹🚴‍♂️📷 🗺️T 3 Replies Last reply
            0
            • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

              Well, everyone, you can now submit a comment to let the FCC know what you think about SpaceX asking for 1 million satellites for "AI datacenters" whatever the fuck that means.

              https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-26-113A1.pdf

              Comments due March 6.

              I am having a very hard time believing this is really happening. Fuck you, SpaceX, and fuck you, FCC. This is not regulation, this is a fucking joke, that will destroy our ability to use satellites for centuries.

              Hot Dog WaterG This user is from outside of this forum
              Hot Dog WaterG This user is from outside of this forum
              Hot Dog Water
              wrote last edited by
              #15

              @sundogplanets

              Elon the illegal South African Nazi predator just can't stop pushing his unwanted stubby nub of a weenie in people's faces.

              What a dirty pig.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                Well, everyone, you can now submit a comment to let the FCC know what you think about SpaceX asking for 1 million satellites for "AI datacenters" whatever the fuck that means.

                https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-26-113A1.pdf

                Comments due March 6.

                I am having a very hard time believing this is really happening. Fuck you, SpaceX, and fuck you, FCC. This is not regulation, this is a fucking joke, that will destroy our ability to use satellites for centuries.

                RowinSpeezR This user is from outside of this forum
                RowinSpeezR This user is from outside of this forum
                RowinSpeez
                wrote last edited by
                #16

                @sundogplanets the good thing is that Elon Musk has never delivered on anything he's ever promised, and this would require rocket launches at such an wildly high pace that I don't think they could come close to pulling this off.

                It's just to juice SpaceX IPO and then musk can be a trillionaire. If the next US administration comes to be, this plan is dumpstered for sure.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                  If anyone has time and energy to set up instructions for how to submit a comment to the FCC (it's really fucking complicated, on purpose, I'm sure), I would very much appreciate it! Otherwise I'll do it in the coming days.

                  Aaron Brick — אהרן בריקA This user is from outside of this forum
                  Aaron Brick — אהרן בריקA This user is from outside of this forum
                  Aaron Brick — אהרן בריק
                  wrote last edited by
                  #17

                  @sundogplanets Yikes. Is DA 26-113 the “docket number or rulemaking number of the proceeding”?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                    Well, everyone, you can now submit a comment to let the FCC know what you think about SpaceX asking for 1 million satellites for "AI datacenters" whatever the fuck that means.

                    https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-26-113A1.pdf

                    Comments due March 6.

                    I am having a very hard time believing this is really happening. Fuck you, SpaceX, and fuck you, FCC. This is not regulation, this is a fucking joke, that will destroy our ability to use satellites for centuries.

                    :copyleft: Kiri :tux:K This user is from outside of this forum
                    :copyleft: Kiri :tux:K This user is from outside of this forum
                    :copyleft: Kiri :tux:
                    wrote last edited by
                    #18

                    @sundogplanets How would a data center event work in outer space? Heat would build up. Unless I'm missing something and the idea is to have something super worse than regular DCs down here?

                    Awk & shaM mkjM 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                      Well, everyone, you can now submit a comment to let the FCC know what you think about SpaceX asking for 1 million satellites for "AI datacenters" whatever the fuck that means.

                      https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-26-113A1.pdf

                      Comments due March 6.

                      I am having a very hard time believing this is really happening. Fuck you, SpaceX, and fuck you, FCC. This is not regulation, this is a fucking joke, that will destroy our ability to use satellites for centuries.

                      Steve LevittJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      Steve LevittJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      Steve Levitt
                      wrote last edited by
                      #19

                      @sundogplanets

                      Remember the hole in ozone days ?
                      Sheesh .
                      Think it was after “ give hoot don’t pollute “ and just before acids rain.

                      Anyway ,, Now we blast rocket fuel through it for the new computer science data barns.
                      🤔. Interesting swings in folk ideology.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Lauren WeinsteinL Lauren Weinstein

                        @sundogplanets It's not going to work. That will be obvious long before he has all that many satellites up, and he'll move on to his next sick joke.

                        Michael KohneM This user is from outside of this forum
                        Michael KohneM This user is from outside of this forum
                        Michael Kohne
                        wrote last edited by
                        #20

                        @lauren @sundogplanets I think this one is about the IPO - he wants to pawn off SpaceX on the open market (especially now that he's rolled the other loser companies into it), and this is about hyping SpaceX. If the commentary were to kill the idea ASAP, it might help fubar the IPO, which would be good for all the rest of us.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • :copyleft: Kiri :tux:K :copyleft: Kiri :tux:

                          @sundogplanets How would a data center event work in outer space? Heat would build up. Unless I'm missing something and the idea is to have something super worse than regular DCs down here?

                          Awk & shaM This user is from outside of this forum
                          Awk & shaM This user is from outside of this forum
                          Awk & sha
                          wrote last edited by
                          #21

                          @kiri @sundogplanets you’re not missing anything; this is absolutely the problem with data centers, structures famously constrained by their ability to reject heat, in space, a place famous for its insulative properties. It’s stupid.

                          Not to mention that data centers require maintenance and equipment replacement. This aspect of data centers is why companies decided not to put them in the ocean (where heat would be easier to reject). How do they think they’ll do maintenance? Or do the satellites just become trash after a few years?

                          six_grandfathers_mountainS SammiS Eliza MBO 3 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                            If anyone has time and energy to set up instructions for how to submit a comment to the FCC (it's really fucking complicated, on purpose, I'm sure), I would very much appreciate it! Otherwise I'll do it in the coming days.

                            bamficB This user is from outside of this forum
                            bamficB This user is from outside of this forum
                            bamfic
                            wrote last edited by
                            #22

                            @sundogplanets https://bsky.brid.gy/r/https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:vcjhk6pveljuwujipu56ggau/post/3me37lcvh6s22

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • Awk & shaM Awk & sha

                              @kiri @sundogplanets you’re not missing anything; this is absolutely the problem with data centers, structures famously constrained by their ability to reject heat, in space, a place famous for its insulative properties. It’s stupid.

                              Not to mention that data centers require maintenance and equipment replacement. This aspect of data centers is why companies decided not to put them in the ocean (where heat would be easier to reject). How do they think they’ll do maintenance? Or do the satellites just become trash after a few years?

                              six_grandfathers_mountainS This user is from outside of this forum
                              six_grandfathers_mountainS This user is from outside of this forum
                              six_grandfathers_mountain
                              wrote last edited by
                              #23

                              @mmcknett @kiri
                              RE
                              constrained..reject heat, in space.. It’s stupid...
                              data centers require maintenance and equipment replacement

                              @sundogplanets
                              RE
                              fucking joke, that will destroy our ability to use #satellites for centuries

                              Anything #SpaceX wants is probably crap bc #ElonMusk is the guy driving the bus

                              And another way to destroy the use of space satellite tech is to have #WW3 which is what will only make big tech richer, 🥵

                              @nomdeb
                              Thx 4 orig Prof. Sam boost

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • James 🌈💜S This user is from outside of this forum
                                James 🌈💜S This user is from outside of this forum
                                James 🌈💜
                                wrote last edited by
                                #24

                                @lexinova @sundogplanets

                                You are way more optimistic than I.
                                They'd just argue over who is responsible and do nothing until we're Kessler'd.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • James 🌈💜S This user is from outside of this forum
                                  James 🌈💜S This user is from outside of this forum
                                  James 🌈💜
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #25

                                  @lexinova

                                  Most of the internet is underground, not over your head. There would be little impact on that front.

                                  And what sattelites there are, are at different orbit heights than the proposal, limiting the impact further.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • Awk & shaM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Awk & shaM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Awk & sha
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #26

                                    @Doomed_Daniel oh yeah, I can’t believe I forgot they have to be radiation-hardened, too!

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • iamsI This user is from outside of this forum
                                      iamsI This user is from outside of this forum
                                      iams
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #27

                                      @acm_redfox @kiri @sundogplanets Ice Particle Shotgun Missiles; the ice would hopefully melt under solar radiation and/or enter atmosphere after dislodging/shredding tf out of objects in orbit, maybe? First strike failed? More melting blammo ice cloud blasts. No lazers, grappling hooks, precise kenetic munitions, nukes, etc. Just a cloud of ice belched from high atmo from a dumb metal casing and a falling trajectory.

                                      :copyleft: Kiri :tux:K 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • iamsI iams

                                        @acm_redfox @kiri @sundogplanets Ice Particle Shotgun Missiles; the ice would hopefully melt under solar radiation and/or enter atmosphere after dislodging/shredding tf out of objects in orbit, maybe? First strike failed? More melting blammo ice cloud blasts. No lazers, grappling hooks, precise kenetic munitions, nukes, etc. Just a cloud of ice belched from high atmo from a dumb metal casing and a falling trajectory.

                                        :copyleft: Kiri :tux:K This user is from outside of this forum
                                        :copyleft: Kiri :tux:K This user is from outside of this forum
                                        :copyleft: Kiri :tux:
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #28

                                        @iams
                                        Lmao
                                        @acm_redfox @sundogplanets

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                                          If anyone has time and energy to set up instructions for how to submit a comment to the FCC (it's really fucking complicated, on purpose, I'm sure), I would very much appreciate it! Otherwise I'll do it in the coming days.

                                          Seán FenianZ This user is from outside of this forum
                                          Seán FenianZ This user is from outside of this forum
                                          Seán Fenian
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #29

                                          @sundogplanets@mastodon.social A milliuon satellites is utterly barking insane. Based on the rate they're burning out GPU/VPUs in AI datacenters, my rough estimate is they're going to need 140 Falcon 9 launches PER DAY just to sustain the constellation. A million satellites that need replacement every 18 months on average?

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups