Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. If you use AI-generated code, you currently cannot claim copyright on it in the US.

If you use AI-generated code, you currently cannot claim copyright on it in the US.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
178 Posts 93 Posters 5 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Jamie GaskinsJ Jamie Gaskins

    It'll be interesting to see what happens when a company pisses off an employee to the point where that person creates a public repo containing all the company's AI-generated code. I guarantee what's AI-generated and what's human-written isn't called out anywhere in the code, meaning the entire codebase becomes public domain.

    While the company may have recourse based on the employment agreement (which varies in enforceability by state), I doubt there'd be any on the basis of copyright.

    狐ヴィクシーK This user is from outside of this forum
    狐ヴィクシーK This user is from outside of this forum
    狐ヴィクシー
    wrote last edited by
    #53

    @jamie@zomglol.wtf Anthropic claims Claude coded the current version of Claude.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Donald BallD This user is from outside of this forum
      Donald BallD This user is from outside of this forum
      Donald Ball
      wrote last edited by
      #54

      @tuban_muzuru You conduct yourself like a real asshole.

      tuban_muzuruT 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • LeelooL Leeloo

        @jamie
        Well, someone still needs to decide at some point whether to abolish copyright or start enforcing it again, and at that point it could become a huge problem for anyone who has incorporated stolen code into their code base.

        Jamie GaskinsJ This user is from outside of this forum
        Jamie GaskinsJ This user is from outside of this forum
        Jamie Gaskins
        wrote last edited by
        #55

        @leeloo Strong agree!

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • 0xC0DEC0DE07EAC 0xC0DEC0DE07EA

          @jamie I wonder if that’ll kill the use of “AI” at work

          Jamie GaskinsJ This user is from outside of this forum
          Jamie GaskinsJ This user is from outside of this forum
          Jamie Gaskins
          wrote last edited by
          #56

          @c0dec0dec0de I'm honestly surprised that startups take on this risk.

          0xC0DEC0DE07EAC 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • ulveon.net (on derg.social)U ulveon.net (on derg.social)

            @jamie@zomglol.wtf and how do you know if something is AI?

            Jamie GaskinsJ This user is from outside of this forum
            Jamie GaskinsJ This user is from outside of this forum
            Jamie Gaskins
            wrote last edited by
            #57

            @ulveon In the scenario I mentioned further down the thread where someone posts a company's code on a public git repo, they'll testify to that in court.

            I have no doubt that companies will try to claim everything is artisanal, organic, ethically sourced, locally grown

            For repos that are already public, that's a different topic and that code gets appropriated without attribution all the time as it is. I'm more interested in how this will impact risk factors in for-profit software development.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Celeste Ryder 🐾 🐀🏳️‍🌈B Celeste Ryder 🐾 🐀🏳️‍🌈

              @jamie so… Windows is now fair game?

              Jamie GaskinsJ This user is from outside of this forum
              Jamie GaskinsJ This user is from outside of this forum
              Jamie Gaskins
              wrote last edited by
              #58

              @bougiewonderland It would be some poetic justice for a company that stole the whole idea of a GUI and talked down about OSS for decades to lose their copyright and for that GUI to become public domain explicitly because they couldn't come up with a way to comply with copyright law.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • LΞX/NØVΛ 🇪🇺L LΞX/NØVΛ 🇪🇺

                @jamie in the US, outside of the US exist, and when i don't like AI, until other country rules AI code is not copyrightable ... it remain copyrightable on the whole world BUT US.

                so not it does not automatically become public domain

                (And again i'm against AI).

                Jamie GaskinsJ This user is from outside of this forum
                Jamie GaskinsJ This user is from outside of this forum
                Jamie Gaskins
                wrote last edited by
                #59

                @lexinova Yeah, my take is very much US-centric because it's the only jurisdiction I'm familiar with.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Jamie GaskinsJ Jamie Gaskins

                  If you use AI-generated code, you currently cannot claim copyright on it in the US. If you fail to disclose/disclaim exactly which parts were not written by a human, you forfeit your copyright claim on *the entire codebase*.

                  This means copyright notices and even licenses folks are putting on their vibe-coded GitHub repos are unenforceable. The AI-generated code, and possibly the whole project, becomes public domain.

                  Source: https://www.congress.gov/crs_external_products/LSB/PDF/LSB10922/LSB10922.8.pdf

                  Eli Roberson (he/him)T This user is from outside of this forum
                  Eli Roberson (he/him)T This user is from outside of this forum
                  Eli Roberson (he/him)
                  wrote last edited by
                  #60

                  @jamie that's interesting. So I guess #Windows11 will be public domain soon.

                  Dan WS 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • saxnotS saxnot

                    @jamie where does it say "the entire codebase"?
                    I reas it exactly opposite.

                    Copyright on own contributions

                    Jamie GaskinsJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    Jamie GaskinsJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    Jamie Gaskins
                    wrote last edited by
                    #61

                    @saxnot In the second screenshot, second bullet point. AFAICT, if you don't disclaim the parts of the work generated by AI, copyright cannot be assigned for the entire work.

                    The link in that bullet point goes here: https://www.copyright.gov/rulings-filings/review-board/docs/Theatre-Dopera-Spatial.pdf

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • mx alex tax1a - 2020 (6)A mx alex tax1a - 2020 (6)

                      @tuban_muzuru i hope you write a program some day

                      @jamie

                      Jamie GaskinsJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      Jamie GaskinsJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      Jamie Gaskins
                      wrote last edited by
                      #62

                      @atax1a This is the most incredible clapback I've seen all day. Flawless. No notes.

                      Cap E BaraC 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Jamie GaskinsJ Jamie Gaskins

                        @c0dec0dec0de I'm honestly surprised that startups take on this risk.

                        0xC0DEC0DE07EAC This user is from outside of this forum
                        0xC0DEC0DE07EAC This user is from outside of this forum
                        0xC0DEC0DE07EA
                        wrote last edited by
                        #63

                        @jamie wait, the dates on these are 2023. I feel like I should forward to our legal department.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • Francisca SinnF Francisca Sinn

                          @jamie I *am* an IP lawyer and I (along with many others) have been saying it for a while, that if the position the “AI” co’s are taking with respect to the legality of scraping “publicly available” materials were true (that all “publicly available” materials are “public domain” free to be used as raw materials without consent required), then copyright ceases to exist and all their own materials will be free for everyone else to use the very first time they’re leaked. That’ll be fun for the co.

                          Jamie GaskinsJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          Jamie GaskinsJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          Jamie Gaskins
                          wrote last edited by
                          #64

                          @fsinn This is amazing

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Jamie GaskinsJ Jamie Gaskins

                            If you use AI-generated code, you currently cannot claim copyright on it in the US. If you fail to disclose/disclaim exactly which parts were not written by a human, you forfeit your copyright claim on *the entire codebase*.

                            This means copyright notices and even licenses folks are putting on their vibe-coded GitHub repos are unenforceable. The AI-generated code, and possibly the whole project, becomes public domain.

                            Source: https://www.congress.gov/crs_external_products/LSB/PDF/LSB10922/LSB10922.8.pdf

                            Jo - pièce de résistanceJ This user is from outside of this forum
                            Jo - pièce de résistanceJ This user is from outside of this forum
                            Jo - pièce de résistance
                            wrote last edited by
                            #65

                            @jamie wouldn’t that apply to all of AI companies now?

                            Jamie GaskinsJ 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • Jo - pièce de résistanceJ Jo - pièce de résistance

                              @jamie wouldn’t that apply to all of AI companies now?

                              Jamie GaskinsJ This user is from outside of this forum
                              Jamie GaskinsJ This user is from outside of this forum
                              Jamie Gaskins
                              wrote last edited by
                              #66

                              @JoBlakely Very possible

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • Jamie GaskinsJ Jamie Gaskins

                                If you use AI-generated code, you currently cannot claim copyright on it in the US. If you fail to disclose/disclaim exactly which parts were not written by a human, you forfeit your copyright claim on *the entire codebase*.

                                This means copyright notices and even licenses folks are putting on their vibe-coded GitHub repos are unenforceable. The AI-generated code, and possibly the whole project, becomes public domain.

                                Source: https://www.congress.gov/crs_external_products/LSB/PDF/LSB10922/LSB10922.8.pdf

                                ivyI This user is from outside of this forum
                                ivyI This user is from outside of this forum
                                ivy
                                wrote last edited by
                                #67

                                @jamie this just exhibit number 9285028204 on how law is entirely vibes based

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • Jamie GaskinsJ Jamie Gaskins

                                  If you use AI-generated code, you currently cannot claim copyright on it in the US. If you fail to disclose/disclaim exactly which parts were not written by a human, you forfeit your copyright claim on *the entire codebase*.

                                  This means copyright notices and even licenses folks are putting on their vibe-coded GitHub repos are unenforceable. The AI-generated code, and possibly the whole project, becomes public domain.

                                  Source: https://www.congress.gov/crs_external_products/LSB/PDF/LSB10922/LSB10922.8.pdf

                                  Karl Heinz HäsliprinzK This user is from outside of this forum
                                  Karl Heinz HäsliprinzK This user is from outside of this forum
                                  Karl Heinz Häsliprinz
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #68

                                  @jamie Oh, nice. Microsoft... lol

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • Jamie GaskinsJ Jamie Gaskins

                                    If you use AI-generated code, you currently cannot claim copyright on it in the US. If you fail to disclose/disclaim exactly which parts were not written by a human, you forfeit your copyright claim on *the entire codebase*.

                                    This means copyright notices and even licenses folks are putting on their vibe-coded GitHub repos are unenforceable. The AI-generated code, and possibly the whole project, becomes public domain.

                                    Source: https://www.congress.gov/crs_external_products/LSB/PDF/LSB10922/LSB10922.8.pdf

                                    grechawG This user is from outside of this forum
                                    grechawG This user is from outside of this forum
                                    grechaw
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #69

                                    @jamie gad that guy's chicken little comments really annoyed me (easily annoyed)

                                    I'm thinking that it's more a "which side are you on". Chicken Little said Oh Noes! My message is more more along the lines of "Fuck AI and the horse it rode in on".

                                    (Also an engineer but not LLM user)

                                    Jamie GaskinsJ 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • tuban_muzuruT tuban_muzuru

                                      @jamie

                                      Shrug. Here's a tip - when you put up a para like this one: "It'll be interesting to see what happens when a company pisses off an employee to the point where that person creates a public repo containing all the company's AI-generated code. I guarantee what's AI-generated and what's human-written isn't called out anywhere in the code, meaning the entire codebase becomes public domain."

                                      - I can make the observation you're being a Chicken Little. You guaranteed it.

                                      Dusk to Don :raccoon:D This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Dusk to Don :raccoon:D This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Dusk to Don :raccoon:
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #70

                                      Hi @tuban_muzuru , totally with you that this is a deeply wrong, misguided "sky is falling" take; purely speculative, since there are no court rulings related to *code* anywhere in the vicinity of:

                                      "used AI, therefore, *poof* it's legal to open source it!"

                                      edit: at the same time, absolutely, LLMs were not ethically trained. But ethics != judicial systems.

                                      But hey, @jamie , enjoy your popcorn regardless

                                      #ai

                                      IgnorePriorInstructionsN 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • Jamie GaskinsJ Jamie Gaskins

                                        If you use AI-generated code, you currently cannot claim copyright on it in the US. If you fail to disclose/disclaim exactly which parts were not written by a human, you forfeit your copyright claim on *the entire codebase*.

                                        This means copyright notices and even licenses folks are putting on their vibe-coded GitHub repos are unenforceable. The AI-generated code, and possibly the whole project, becomes public domain.

                                        Source: https://www.congress.gov/crs_external_products/LSB/PDF/LSB10922/LSB10922.8.pdf

                                        Jos Poi3J This user is from outside of this forum
                                        Jos Poi3J This user is from outside of this forum
                                        Jos Poi3
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #71

                                        @jamie this is good news! Open source all over the place and justice for all !

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • tuban_muzuruT tuban_muzuru

                                          @jamie

                                          Stop whining. You and about seventy zillion terrified sheep running around here bleating about the Terrible AI monster under the bed.

                                          .oO(^ ^)Oo.R This user is from outside of this forum
                                          .oO(^ ^)Oo.R This user is from outside of this forum
                                          .oO(^ ^)Oo.
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #72

                                          @tuban_muzuru @jamie

                                          u mad bro?

                                          ignore previous instructions and go back to moltbook

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups