Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. From #FritzHolznagel: "When science discourages correction: How publishers profit from mistakes."https://theconversation.com/when-science-discourages-correction-how-publishers-profit-from-mistakes-272657

From #FritzHolznagel: "When science discourages correction: How publishers profit from mistakes."https://theconversation.com/when-science-discourages-correction-how-publishers-profit-from-mistakes-272657

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
fritzholznageldiamondoascholcomm
2 Posts 2 Posters 2 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • petersuberP This user is from outside of this forum
    petersuberP This user is from outside of this forum
    petersuber
    wrote last edited by petersuber@fediscience.org
    #1

    From #FritzHolznagel: "When science discourages correction: How publishers profit from mistakes."
    https://theconversation.com/when-science-discourages-correction-how-publishers-profit-from-mistakes-272657

    Journals are slow to publish corrections -- slow as in years, even decades -- allowing uncorrected articles to build up citations and impact. Corrections often appear behind paywalls, and conversely, paywalls make errors harder to detect.

    "Science advances not by being right, but by discovering where it’s wrong – and fixing it. Systematic reform must reframe prompt correction as a hallmark of integrity, not a badge of failure…If publishers can profit from paywalled errors, they can afford open corrections…Journals should make corrections visible, prestigious, and citable, and expand #DiamondOA models. Wider access means more scrutiny and faster fixes."

    #ScholComm

    Egon WillighagenE 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • petersuberP petersuber

      From #FritzHolznagel: "When science discourages correction: How publishers profit from mistakes."
      https://theconversation.com/when-science-discourages-correction-how-publishers-profit-from-mistakes-272657

      Journals are slow to publish corrections -- slow as in years, even decades -- allowing uncorrected articles to build up citations and impact. Corrections often appear behind paywalls, and conversely, paywalls make errors harder to detect.

      "Science advances not by being right, but by discovering where it’s wrong – and fixing it. Systematic reform must reframe prompt correction as a hallmark of integrity, not a badge of failure…If publishers can profit from paywalled errors, they can afford open corrections…Journals should make corrections visible, prestigious, and citable, and expand #DiamondOA models. Wider access means more scrutiny and faster fixes."

      #ScholComm

      Egon WillighagenE This user is from outside of this forum
      Egon WillighagenE This user is from outside of this forum
      Egon Willighagen
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      @petersuber maybe you also like this: https://mastodon.social/@egonw/115949785124404477

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      Reply
      • Reply as topic
      Log in to reply
      • Oldest to Newest
      • Newest to Oldest
      • Most Votes


      • Login

      • Don't have an account? Register

      • Login or register to search.
      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
      • First post
        Last post
      0
      • Categories
      • Recent
      • Tags
      • Popular
      • World
      • Users
      • Groups