Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. I’ve been thinking about this for days.

I’ve been thinking about this for days.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
16 Posts 13 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mhoyeM mhoye

    I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

    (Via @jonathankoren )

    Dan PortsD This user is from outside of this forum
    Dan PortsD This user is from outside of this forum
    Dan Ports
    wrote last edited by
    #4

    @mhoye @jonathankoren wow, so much more efficient than the state-of-the-art algorithm: asking a LLM whether x is prime

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • mhoyeM mhoye

      @sellout @jonathankoren right!?

      RyeNCode 🇨🇦R This user is from outside of this forum
      RyeNCode 🇨🇦R This user is from outside of this forum
      RyeNCode 🇨🇦
      wrote last edited by
      #5

      @mhoye @sellout @jonathankoren
      It's accuracy asymptotically approaches 100%
      That's amazing!
      Slight cavities about using it for cryptographic purposes or around smallish numbers.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • mhoyeM mhoye

        I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

        (Via @jonathankoren )

        philosophizes whilst swimmingA This user is from outside of this forum
        philosophizes whilst swimmingA This user is from outside of this forum
        philosophizes whilst swimming
        wrote last edited by
        #6

        @jonathankoren @mhoye they’re all good algorithms, Brent

        jonathankoren™J 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • philosophizes whilst swimmingA philosophizes whilst swimming

          @jonathankoren @mhoye they’re all good algorithms, Brent

          jonathankoren™J This user is from outside of this forum
          jonathankoren™J This user is from outside of this forum
          jonathankoren™
          wrote last edited by
          #7

          @adardis @mhoye there are no bad algorithms. There are only bad use cases.

          eiriasE The DoctorD 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • mhoyeM mhoye

            I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

            (Via @jonathankoren )

            groxxG This user is from outside of this forum
            groxxG This user is from outside of this forum
            groxx
            wrote last edited by
            #8

            @mhoye @jonathankoren it's branchless too, and easily parallelized onto a GPU to speed it up

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • mhoyeM mhoye

              I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

              (Via @jonathankoren )

              Ollie BoermansO This user is from outside of this forum
              Ollie BoermansO This user is from outside of this forum
              Ollie Boermans
              wrote last edited by
              #9

              @mhoye @jonathankoren @daedalus I hope the crypto crew catch wind of this. Has potential to save a lot of electricity

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • jonathankoren™J jonathankoren™

                @adardis @mhoye there are no bad algorithms. There are only bad use cases.

                eiriasE This user is from outside of this forum
                eiriasE This user is from outside of this forum
                eirias
                wrote last edited by
                #10

                @jonathankoren @adardis @mhoye this is like that weather aphorism, isn't it

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • mhoyeM mhoye

                  I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

                  (Via @jonathankoren )

                  Mark ReidM This user is from outside of this forum
                  Mark ReidM This user is from outside of this forum
                  Mark Reid
                  wrote last edited by
                  #11

                  @mhoye @jonathankoren @rmondello Surprising fact: exactly the same algorithm works even better for many other problems: perfect numbers, powers of two, busy beaver, etc.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • mhoyeM mhoye

                    I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

                    (Via @jonathankoren )

                    Tom BortelsT This user is from outside of this forum
                    Tom BortelsT This user is from outside of this forum
                    Tom Bortels
                    wrote last edited by
                    #12

                    @jonathankoren @mhoye

                    The problem is its inaccuracy for smaller input sets involving low-digit-count numbers.

                    Trivially fixed by hardcoding the results for 3-digit and lower input. Ship it!

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • jonathankoren™J jonathankoren™

                      @adardis @mhoye there are no bad algorithms. There are only bad use cases.

                      The DoctorD This user is from outside of this forum
                      The DoctorD This user is from outside of this forum
                      The Doctor
                      wrote last edited by
                      #13

                      @jonathankoren @adardis @mhoye Can I quote you on that?

                      mhoyeM jonathankoren™J 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • The DoctorD The Doctor

                        @jonathankoren @adardis @mhoye Can I quote you on that?

                        mhoyeM This user is from outside of this forum
                        mhoyeM This user is from outside of this forum
                        mhoye
                        wrote last edited by
                        #14

                        @drwho @jonathankoren @adardis It's such a good line.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • mhoyeM mhoye

                          I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

                          (Via @jonathankoren )

                          cubeosC This user is from outside of this forum
                          cubeosC This user is from outside of this forum
                          cubeos
                          wrote last edited by
                          #15

                          @mhoye @jonathankoren It also provides the script for a math party trick: "Tell me any 100 digit number and I will tell you if it's prime!'

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • The DoctorD The Doctor

                            @jonathankoren @adardis @mhoye Can I quote you on that?

                            jonathankoren™J This user is from outside of this forum
                            jonathankoren™J This user is from outside of this forum
                            jonathankoren™
                            wrote last edited by
                            #16

                            @drwho @adardis @mhoye why would I care?

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • R ActivityRelay shared this topic
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Don't have an account? Register

                            • Login or register to search.
                            Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • World
                            • Users
                            • Groups