Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. I’ve been thinking about this for days.

I’ve been thinking about this for days.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
16 Posts 13 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mhoyeM mhoye

    @sellout @jonathankoren right!?

    RyeNCode 🇨🇦R This user is from outside of this forum
    RyeNCode 🇨🇦R This user is from outside of this forum
    RyeNCode 🇨🇦
    wrote last edited by
    #5

    @mhoye @sellout @jonathankoren
    It's accuracy asymptotically approaches 100%
    That's amazing!
    Slight cavities about using it for cryptographic purposes or around smallish numbers.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • mhoyeM mhoye

      I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

      (Via @jonathankoren )

      philosophizes whilst swimmingA This user is from outside of this forum
      philosophizes whilst swimmingA This user is from outside of this forum
      philosophizes whilst swimming
      wrote last edited by
      #6

      @jonathankoren @mhoye they’re all good algorithms, Brent

      jonathankoren™J 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • philosophizes whilst swimmingA philosophizes whilst swimming

        @jonathankoren @mhoye they’re all good algorithms, Brent

        jonathankoren™J This user is from outside of this forum
        jonathankoren™J This user is from outside of this forum
        jonathankoren™
        wrote last edited by
        #7

        @adardis @mhoye there are no bad algorithms. There are only bad use cases.

        eiriasE The DoctorD 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • mhoyeM mhoye

          I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

          (Via @jonathankoren )

          groxxG This user is from outside of this forum
          groxxG This user is from outside of this forum
          groxx
          wrote last edited by
          #8

          @mhoye @jonathankoren it's branchless too, and easily parallelized onto a GPU to speed it up

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • mhoyeM mhoye

            I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

            (Via @jonathankoren )

            Ollie BoermansO This user is from outside of this forum
            Ollie BoermansO This user is from outside of this forum
            Ollie Boermans
            wrote last edited by
            #9

            @mhoye @jonathankoren @daedalus I hope the crypto crew catch wind of this. Has potential to save a lot of electricity

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • jonathankoren™J jonathankoren™

              @adardis @mhoye there are no bad algorithms. There are only bad use cases.

              eiriasE This user is from outside of this forum
              eiriasE This user is from outside of this forum
              eirias
              wrote last edited by
              #10

              @jonathankoren @adardis @mhoye this is like that weather aphorism, isn't it

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • mhoyeM mhoye

                I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

                (Via @jonathankoren )

                Mark ReidM This user is from outside of this forum
                Mark ReidM This user is from outside of this forum
                Mark Reid
                wrote last edited by
                #11

                @mhoye @jonathankoren @rmondello Surprising fact: exactly the same algorithm works even better for many other problems: perfect numbers, powers of two, busy beaver, etc.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • mhoyeM mhoye

                  I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

                  (Via @jonathankoren )

                  Tom BortelsT This user is from outside of this forum
                  Tom BortelsT This user is from outside of this forum
                  Tom Bortels
                  wrote last edited by
                  #12

                  @jonathankoren @mhoye

                  The problem is its inaccuracy for smaller input sets involving low-digit-count numbers.

                  Trivially fixed by hardcoding the results for 3-digit and lower input. Ship it!

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • jonathankoren™J jonathankoren™

                    @adardis @mhoye there are no bad algorithms. There are only bad use cases.

                    The DoctorD This user is from outside of this forum
                    The DoctorD This user is from outside of this forum
                    The Doctor
                    wrote last edited by
                    #13

                    @jonathankoren @adardis @mhoye Can I quote you on that?

                    mhoyeM jonathankoren™J 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • The DoctorD The Doctor

                      @jonathankoren @adardis @mhoye Can I quote you on that?

                      mhoyeM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mhoyeM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mhoye
                      wrote last edited by
                      #14

                      @drwho @jonathankoren @adardis It's such a good line.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • mhoyeM mhoye

                        I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

                        (Via @jonathankoren )

                        cubeosC This user is from outside of this forum
                        cubeosC This user is from outside of this forum
                        cubeos
                        wrote last edited by
                        #15

                        @mhoye @jonathankoren It also provides the script for a math party trick: "Tell me any 100 digit number and I will tell you if it's prime!'

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • The DoctorD The Doctor

                          @jonathankoren @adardis @mhoye Can I quote you on that?

                          jonathankoren™J This user is from outside of this forum
                          jonathankoren™J This user is from outside of this forum
                          jonathankoren™
                          wrote last edited by
                          #16

                          @drwho @adardis @mhoye why would I care?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • R ActivityRelay shared this topic
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups