Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. I’ve been thinking about this for days.

I’ve been thinking about this for days.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
16 Posts 13 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • philosophizes whilst swimmingA philosophizes whilst swimming

    @jonathankoren @mhoye they’re all good algorithms, Brent

    jonathankoren™J This user is from outside of this forum
    jonathankoren™J This user is from outside of this forum
    jonathankoren™
    wrote last edited by
    #7

    @adardis @mhoye there are no bad algorithms. There are only bad use cases.

    eiriasE The DoctorD 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • mhoyeM mhoye

      I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

      (Via @jonathankoren )

      groxxG This user is from outside of this forum
      groxxG This user is from outside of this forum
      groxx
      wrote last edited by
      #8

      @mhoye @jonathankoren it's branchless too, and easily parallelized onto a GPU to speed it up

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • mhoyeM mhoye

        I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

        (Via @jonathankoren )

        Ollie BoermansO This user is from outside of this forum
        Ollie BoermansO This user is from outside of this forum
        Ollie Boermans
        wrote last edited by
        #9

        @mhoye @jonathankoren @daedalus I hope the crypto crew catch wind of this. Has potential to save a lot of electricity

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • jonathankoren™J jonathankoren™

          @adardis @mhoye there are no bad algorithms. There are only bad use cases.

          eiriasE This user is from outside of this forum
          eiriasE This user is from outside of this forum
          eirias
          wrote last edited by
          #10

          @jonathankoren @adardis @mhoye this is like that weather aphorism, isn't it

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • mhoyeM mhoye

            I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

            (Via @jonathankoren )

            Mark ReidM This user is from outside of this forum
            Mark ReidM This user is from outside of this forum
            Mark Reid
            wrote last edited by
            #11

            @mhoye @jonathankoren @rmondello Surprising fact: exactly the same algorithm works even better for many other problems: perfect numbers, powers of two, busy beaver, etc.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • mhoyeM mhoye

              I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

              (Via @jonathankoren )

              Tom BortelsT This user is from outside of this forum
              Tom BortelsT This user is from outside of this forum
              Tom Bortels
              wrote last edited by
              #12

              @jonathankoren @mhoye

              The problem is its inaccuracy for smaller input sets involving low-digit-count numbers.

              Trivially fixed by hardcoding the results for 3-digit and lower input. Ship it!

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • jonathankoren™J jonathankoren™

                @adardis @mhoye there are no bad algorithms. There are only bad use cases.

                The DoctorD This user is from outside of this forum
                The DoctorD This user is from outside of this forum
                The Doctor
                wrote last edited by
                #13

                @jonathankoren @adardis @mhoye Can I quote you on that?

                mhoyeM jonathankoren™J 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • The DoctorD The Doctor

                  @jonathankoren @adardis @mhoye Can I quote you on that?

                  mhoyeM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mhoyeM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mhoye
                  wrote last edited by
                  #14

                  @drwho @jonathankoren @adardis It's such a good line.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • mhoyeM mhoye

                    I’ve been thinking about this for days. Incredible stochastic algorithm, gets more reliable the larger your input, incredibly fast, trivial to implement and deterministic on its inputs. It really has so much going for it.

                    (Via @jonathankoren )

                    cubeosC This user is from outside of this forum
                    cubeosC This user is from outside of this forum
                    cubeos
                    wrote last edited by
                    #15

                    @mhoye @jonathankoren It also provides the script for a math party trick: "Tell me any 100 digit number and I will tell you if it's prime!'

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • The DoctorD The Doctor

                      @jonathankoren @adardis @mhoye Can I quote you on that?

                      jonathankoren™J This user is from outside of this forum
                      jonathankoren™J This user is from outside of this forum
                      jonathankoren™
                      wrote last edited by
                      #16

                      @drwho @adardis @mhoye why would I care?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • R ActivityRelay shared this topic
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups