I'm shocked, shocked, that Adam's apple inspector extraordinaire JK Rowling was "close personal friends" with Epstein and that she has had to wipe the travel logs of her yacht.
-
I'm shocked, shocked, that Adam's apple inspector extraordinaire JK Rowling was "close personal friends" with Epstein and that she has had to wipe the travel logs of her yacht. Home Alone shocked face.
@selzero Because writing Harry Potter books didn't give her enough access to children, or something. Jimmy Savile vibes.
-
@nele1999 The emails are signed Jx capital J small x. This is something she has used for years on Twitter.
Either she was "close personal friends" with Epstein.
OR
Someone sent these emails from her email address to people in her organisation and signed them as her in an attempt to frame her when years later the emails end up in FBI files as part of the Epstein investigations.
A very sneaky trap indeed
-
Thats what i saw also
@Noortjevee @xinit it is signed Jx which is what she uses on Twitter.
If her PA was trying to frame her, planning that the email would end up in FBI files, that would eventually get exposed, she may have signed it like that
-
@Noortjevee @xinit it is signed Jx which is what she uses on Twitter.
If her PA was trying to frame her, planning that the email would end up in FBI files, that would eventually get exposed, she may have signed it like that
@selzero I didn't see the JX thing - it's useless as a search term, though. Which file?
-
And pedophilia. Crime binds. JK Rowling and Epstein.
@kevinrns Pedophilia is very much a crime of the rich and powerful - I wonder sometimes if it should be thought of more as a dominance expression than "sexual".
-
Oh yes its just assault, child predators dont have sex they harm, and enjoy the victims pain. Broken, psychopaths.
Its not sex, they aren't women, its assault, psychotic sadism.
-
@Noortjevee @xinit it is signed Jx which is what she uses on Twitter.
If her PA was trying to frame her, planning that the email would end up in FBI files, that would eventually get exposed, she may have signed it like that
Like i said, i really dislike her...but wont accuse her of stuff i have not seen undisputable proof for...
I dont want to give her more ammo for when it turns out not to have been her.
Because i just know she will use it as ammo to spread more of her vile hatred.
-
@LaChasseuse @kevinrns @selzero Power crime. Dominance.
-
@Noortjevee @xinit I'm not a journalist I can fill in the blanks by eliminating highly improbable excuses.
-
I'm shocked, shocked, that Adam's apple inspector extraordinaire JK Rowling was "close personal friends" with Epstein and that she has had to wipe the travel logs of her yacht. Home Alone shocked face.
@selzero oh no the author with the racist stereotypes in her books and vile rethoric against people trying to express their true self turns out to be a shitbag.
-
@selzero @xinit @Noortjevee I am also waiting for a reputable outlet to write something up. It's very speculation at the minute.
Which I'm fine with people doing - I too would love to see her crash and burn. But as you say, if it's basically a nothing burger she will use that and she will raise more funds to cause more harm. So I'm waiting. -
@selzero @xinit @Noortjevee I am also waiting for a reputable outlet to write something up. It's very speculation at the minute.
Which I'm fine with people doing - I too would love to see her crash and burn. But as you say, if it's basically a nothing burger she will use that and she will raise more funds to cause more harm. So I'm waiting.@noodlemaz @xinit @Noortjevee unfortunately, since the nut jobs have taken over governments, we won't get media covering this properly.
It's better to read the source for yourself instead of delegate your mind to others anyway.
-
@noodlemaz @xinit @Noortjevee unfortunately, since the nut jobs have taken over governments, we won't get media covering this properly.
It's better to read the source for yourself instead of delegate your mind to others anyway.
@selzero @xinit @Noortjevee This is my point, the 'source' isn't enough. It's heavily redacted and people are making all kinds of guesses. That's not what I want, I want journalism. I am not a journalist. Most people aren't. Looking at sources isn't journalism. I want careful follow-up and corroboration. We can't leave her easy escape routes like 'do your own research' always creates, sorry.
