Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Defending #Greenland in case of military aggression from the USA is often reduced to the complexities of Art. 5 NATO.

Defending #Greenland in case of military aggression from the USA is often reduced to the complexities of Art. 5 NATO.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
greenland
15 Posts 9 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange:J Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange:

    Defending #Greenland in case of military aggression from the USA is often reduced to the complexities of Art. 5 NATO. But there is a similar rule for EU member states, that will be automatically triggered without NATO but demands the same commitments as given to NATO for EU members that are also NATO members.

    Article 42(7) of the Treaty on European Union (TEU)

    https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/article-427-teu-eus-mutual-assistance-clause_en

    Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange:J This user is from outside of this forum
    Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange:J This user is from outside of this forum
    Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange:
    wrote last edited by
    #6

    This rule will obviously become very relevant when Ukraine joins the EU. And one can build a NATO-less defence strategy on it if the political will is strong enough.

    Aral BalkanA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange:J Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange:

      @johl Denmark is, though.

      Jens OhligJ This user is from outside of this forum
      Jens OhligJ This user is from outside of this forum
      Jens Ohlig
      wrote last edited by
      #7

      @jwildeboer Sure, another part of the Kingdom of Denmark (Denmark mainland) is an EU member. But that doesn’t make it true for Greenland. The Greenlandic demand for a referendum to leave the EU was a trigger for the events that lead to home rule in Greenland. Ignoring that would not be very popular with Greenlanders.

      Jens OhligJ 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange:J Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange:

        This rule will obviously become very relevant when Ukraine joins the EU. And one can build a NATO-less defence strategy on it if the political will is strong enough.

        Aral BalkanA This user is from outside of this forum
        Aral BalkanA This user is from outside of this forum
        Aral Balkan
        wrote last edited by
        #8

        @jwildeboer Does this require politicians with a backbone? Because I can see that being a problem…

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Jens OhligJ Jens Ohlig

          @jwildeboer Sure, another part of the Kingdom of Denmark (Denmark mainland) is an EU member. But that doesn’t make it true for Greenland. The Greenlandic demand for a referendum to leave the EU was a trigger for the events that lead to home rule in Greenland. Ignoring that would not be very popular with Greenlanders.

          Jens OhligJ This user is from outside of this forum
          Jens OhligJ This user is from outside of this forum
          Jens Ohlig
          wrote last edited by
          #9

          @jwildeboer I hope that an entirely independent Greenland would reconsider things and join the EU at some point in the future. But it’s not political reality.

          Jens OhligJ A 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • Jens OhligJ Jens Ohlig

            @jwildeboer I hope that an entirely independent Greenland would reconsider things and join the EU at some point in the future. But it’s not political reality.

            Jens OhligJ This user is from outside of this forum
            Jens OhligJ This user is from outside of this forum
            Jens Ohlig
            wrote last edited by
            #10

            @jwildeboer So, unless Trump bombs Copenhagen, I don’t see how the EU defense clause would be triggered.

            Jens OhligJ 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Jens OhligJ Jens Ohlig

              @jwildeboer So, unless Trump bombs Copenhagen, I don’t see how the EU defense clause would be triggered.

              Jens OhligJ This user is from outside of this forum
              Jens OhligJ This user is from outside of this forum
              Jens Ohlig
              wrote last edited by
              #11

              @jwildeboer It’s comparable to how Aruba, Curaçao, and Sint Maarten are members of the Kingdom of the Netherlands and let the Netherlands call the shots on foreign policy and defense, but are not EU members.

              Ton ZijlstraT 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange:J Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange:

                Defending #Greenland in case of military aggression from the USA is often reduced to the complexities of Art. 5 NATO. But there is a similar rule for EU member states, that will be automatically triggered without NATO but demands the same commitments as given to NATO for EU members that are also NATO members.

                Article 42(7) of the Treaty on European Union (TEU)

                https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/article-427-teu-eus-mutual-assistance-clause_en

                T This user is from outside of this forum
                T This user is from outside of this forum
                Nobody ناچیز नास्ति (he/him)
                wrote last edited by
                #12

                @jwildeboer
                Not sure anyone will honour those obligations. To wit: the genocide convention in contemporaneous history.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange:J Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange:

                  Defending #Greenland in case of military aggression from the USA is often reduced to the complexities of Art. 5 NATO. But there is a similar rule for EU member states, that will be automatically triggered without NATO but demands the same commitments as given to NATO for EU members that are also NATO members.

                  Article 42(7) of the Treaty on European Union (TEU)

                  https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/article-427-teu-eus-mutual-assistance-clause_en

                  Forse (he/him)F This user is from outside of this forum
                  Forse (he/him)F This user is from outside of this forum
                  Forse (he/him)
                  wrote last edited by
                  #13

                  @jwildeboer Ok, but what is actually forcing our Dear Leaders to *actually* follow those rules?
                  What do they lose if they don't follow it?
                  Do they go to prison?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Jens OhligJ Jens Ohlig

                    @jwildeboer I hope that an entirely independent Greenland would reconsider things and join the EU at some point in the future. But it’s not political reality.

                    A This user is from outside of this forum
                    A This user is from outside of this forum
                    AngbarerAlchimist
                    wrote last edited by
                    #14

                    @johl @jwildeboer
                    Unrealistic in my eyes, maybe a Icelandlike status might be the better solution. (maybe for Canada as well?)
                    Until then tripwire forces (NATO, but not US) would probably be the best bet...

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Jens OhligJ Jens Ohlig

                      @jwildeboer It’s comparable to how Aruba, Curaçao, and Sint Maarten are members of the Kingdom of the Netherlands and let the Netherlands call the shots on foreign policy and defense, but are not EU members.

                      Ton ZijlstraT This user is from outside of this forum
                      Ton ZijlstraT This user is from outside of this forum
                      Ton Zijlstra
                      wrote last edited by
                      #15

                      @johl @jwildeboer I still think it is a lost opportunity that St. Maarten is not a special municipality and in the EU. We would have had an internal EU/Schengen French-Dutch border!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • R ActivityRelay shared this topic
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups