@robotistry @david_chisnall @futurebird while I agree with the thought of what you're posting...

What?!? Dude. that's "if we can put a man on the moon, why can't we put a man on Mars?"

@david_chisnall @futurebird I talked to a friend who made a lot of money taking a company public (and who is a huge booster of llm-assisted coding) about this exact issue.

his response was kind of horrifying, but at least now I understand how these people think. He said "I don't care. companies don't fail because their code is unsustainable, they fail because they don't have a product. by the time the tech debt comes due, you should have already sold the company."

@lain @anderseknert the rejection doesn't seem too crazy? what are you saying doesn't seem too crazy?

@troed @anderseknert and then the question is whether you believe that or whether you think it is PR by the company.

I think it's pr.

@some @anderseknert without retracting the original, terribly written post or even linking to the retraction.

I don't think this is a llm, I think this is the human behind it.

@anderseknert what a freaking awful world.

@anderseknert actually - given how stupid the blog is, is there anything in it suggesting that it was written by an llm rather than the human behind the llm?

@anderseknert if you read the blog post, it is the stupidest, most butthurt post possible. it doesn't address the issue at all.

it's truly trained on human comments.

@jeffcodes @carrideen @futurebird At law School, I, then a thirty year old man, pursued, dated, and eventually married a 35-year-old professor. we have three beautiful children together.

be careful of categoricals like there is no world.

@GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva right. like if you move off of beef to a plant based diet it becomes just as bad.

oh wait, that's wrong and an insane think to say.