Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Have you wondered where the claim that autistic people lack empathy came from?

Have you wondered where the claim that autistic people lack empathy came from?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
actuallyautistitheoryofmindpsychologyneurodiversityempathy
153 Posts 69 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Everyday.Human DerekE Everyday.Human Derek

    @punishmenthurts @farah @KatyElphinstone
    We had cold températures, probably not cold for a season pro like you. I had to get creative and essentially layer my flat in air gapped microclimates, 40 degrees or 3/4 isn’t all that warm inside when its -10 outside

    Goiterzan/Amygdalai LamaP This user is from outside of this forum
    Goiterzan/Amygdalai LamaP This user is from outside of this forum
    Goiterzan/Amygdalai Lama
    wrote last edited by
    #81

    @EVDHmn @farah @KatyElphinstone
    .
    oh, I’m on the coast, I don’t think my hummingbird feeder froze since November. I don’t think I’ve seen -10 this winter.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Everyday.Human DerekE Everyday.Human Derek

      @punishmenthurts @farah @KatyElphinstone
      By the Time I was done my appartment kind of looked like a scene out of dexter with all the plastic and duct tape .

      Goiterzan/Amygdalai LamaP This user is from outside of this forum
      Goiterzan/Amygdalai LamaP This user is from outside of this forum
      Goiterzan/Amygdalai Lama
      wrote last edited by
      #82

      @EVDHmn @farah @KatyElphinstone
      .
      🤣🤣🤣🤣

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Katy ElphinstoneK Katy Elphinstone

        Have you wondered where the claim that autistic people lack empathy came from?

        The “jellyfish” study (2011) was influential in this, as it concluded that autistic people lacked Theory of Mind & capacity for moral reasoning.

        https://medicalxpress.com/news/2011-01-autistic-mind.html

        In the fictional scenario given to participants, Sally tells a friend it’s safe to swim with jellyfish. She believes they’re harmless. The friend is stung and dies.

        ⬇️

        #Autism #Empathy #Neurodiversity #Psychology #TheoryofMind #ActuallyAutistic

        Jens FinkhäuserJ This user is from outside of this forum
        Jens FinkhäuserJ This user is from outside of this forum
        Jens Finkhäuser
        wrote last edited by
        #83

        @KatyElphinstone I have rarely read an article so loaded with bad faith and bad assumptions. Wow. I can't even get to the points you're discussing over that.

        Jens FinkhäuserJ 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Katy ElphinstoneK Katy Elphinstone

          Have you wondered where the claim that autistic people lack empathy came from?

          The “jellyfish” study (2011) was influential in this, as it concluded that autistic people lacked Theory of Mind & capacity for moral reasoning.

          https://medicalxpress.com/news/2011-01-autistic-mind.html

          In the fictional scenario given to participants, Sally tells a friend it’s safe to swim with jellyfish. She believes they’re harmless. The friend is stung and dies.

          ⬇️

          #Autism #Empathy #Neurodiversity #Psychology #TheoryofMind #ActuallyAutistic

          Dawn AhukannaD This user is from outside of this forum
          Dawn AhukannaD This user is from outside of this forum
          Dawn Ahukanna
          wrote last edited by
          #84

          @KatyElphinstone what was the result from the control set with allistics (non-autistic people)?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Jens FinkhäuserJ Jens Finkhäuser

            @KatyElphinstone I have rarely read an article so loaded with bad faith and bad assumptions. Wow. I can't even get to the points you're discussing over that.

            Jens FinkhäuserJ This user is from outside of this forum
            Jens FinkhäuserJ This user is from outside of this forum
            Jens Finkhäuser
            wrote last edited by
            #85

            @KatyElphinstone Like, none of this relates to Theory of Mind. At all.

            "This shows that their judgments rely more on the outcome of the incident than on an understanding of the person's intentions"

            Yes, two things about that.

            a) People judge way more based on outcomes than intentions. It's a lesson driven home by every "you're so weird" I heard throughout my life. It takes real effort for folk to take intentions on board, and they're not usually willing to expend that effort.

            And b) it's...

            Jens FinkhäuserJ 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Katy ElphinstoneK Katy Elphinstone

              Have you wondered where the claim that autistic people lack empathy came from?

              The “jellyfish” study (2011) was influential in this, as it concluded that autistic people lacked Theory of Mind & capacity for moral reasoning.

              https://medicalxpress.com/news/2011-01-autistic-mind.html

              In the fictional scenario given to participants, Sally tells a friend it’s safe to swim with jellyfish. She believes they’re harmless. The friend is stung and dies.

              ⬇️

              #Autism #Empathy #Neurodiversity #Psychology #TheoryofMind #ActuallyAutistic

              notsoloudN This user is from outside of this forum
              notsoloudN This user is from outside of this forum
              notsoloud
              wrote last edited by
              #86

              @KatyElphinstone
              Sounds like running the question past a philosopher would have cleared up a few things.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Jens FinkhäuserJ Jens Finkhäuser

                @KatyElphinstone Like, none of this relates to Theory of Mind. At all.

                "This shows that their judgments rely more on the outcome of the incident than on an understanding of the person's intentions"

                Yes, two things about that.

                a) People judge way more based on outcomes than intentions. It's a lesson driven home by every "you're so weird" I heard throughout my life. It takes real effort for folk to take intentions on board, and they're not usually willing to expend that effort.

                And b) it's...

                Jens FinkhäuserJ This user is from outside of this forum
                Jens FinkhäuserJ This user is from outside of this forum
                Jens Finkhäuser
                wrote last edited by
                #87

                @KatyElphinstone ... also how law works. At least that's the idea. Germany doesn't use so much case law (it still does), so the general idea is that first, the facts determine what the crime is, and THEN intentions influence whether the punishment is more or less severe than the baseline.

                So how can one turn into a moral failing what the very foundation of our rule of law is supposedly built upon?

                It boggles the mind.

                Jens FinkhäuserJ 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Jens FinkhäuserJ Jens Finkhäuser

                  @KatyElphinstone ... also how law works. At least that's the idea. Germany doesn't use so much case law (it still does), so the general idea is that first, the facts determine what the crime is, and THEN intentions influence whether the punishment is more or less severe than the baseline.

                  So how can one turn into a moral failing what the very foundation of our rule of law is supposedly built upon?

                  It boggles the mind.

                  Jens FinkhäuserJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  Jens FinkhäuserJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  Jens Finkhäuser
                  wrote last edited by
                  #88

                  @KatyElphinstone "those with a milder form of autism such as Asperger's syndrome, often develop compensatory mechanisms to deal with their difficulties in understanding other people's thoughts. The details of these mechanisms are unknown"

                  The mechanisms are "unknown"? They're observation and deduction, forced on by having to figure out your illogical shit with no help from you and no manual.

                  What a twerp. They're supposed to be a scientist, and have this shit down.

                  Cthulhu weeps, that's bad.

                  Not a Spring OnionW 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Gwen :therian: :neofox_nom_fox_nervous:G Gwen :therian: :neofox_nom_fox_nervous:

                    @sinvega@mas.to @KatyElphinstone@mas.to I started with a message lower in the thread. Once I read the context, my immediate reaction was to say, out loud, "wtf, she shouldn't be asserting things if she doesn't know"

                    Like yeah, I think she is responsible, because her lack of double checking is what led to the outcome. Does that mean I want something to be done? Hell no! At most this is a cautionary tale of why you should always know the edge of your knowledge, nothing more

                    Katy ElphinstoneK This user is from outside of this forum
                    Katy ElphinstoneK This user is from outside of this forum
                    Katy Elphinstone
                    wrote last edited by
                    #89

                    @gwenthefops

                    I so agree about knowing the edge of your knowledge. At least a little humility...

                    @sinvega

                    Leszek CiesielskiS 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Miakoda :neurodiversity:H Miakoda :neurodiversity:

                      @KatyElphinstone I'm autistic. I'm empathtic enough that someone else's misery makes me feel miserable. When I say I want everyone to be ok, not only do I care about the well being of others, it also would improve my own quality of life. The pain and suffering of other people hurts me.

                      Katy ElphinstoneK This user is from outside of this forum
                      Katy ElphinstoneK This user is from outside of this forum
                      Katy Elphinstone
                      wrote last edited by
                      #90

                      @hellomiakoda

                      💟🙏

                      I'm the same.

                      This thread is actually a byproduct out of an article I'm writing on autistic empathy. I'm nearly done but these are the kinds of things that will go into it.

                      (And when finished I'll be asking for people's thoughts / feedback!)

                      Miakoda :neurodiversity:H 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • UrzlG Urzl

                        @KatyElphinstone I have explicitly argued more than once that we have two different concepts that are routinely conflated in broader society, excuses and reasons.

                        An excuse is an ethical justification for a thing.
                        A reason is a logical justification for a thing.

                        If I acknowledged that theft is logically justified by lack of wealth, whether that entails an excuse is an entirely other argument to be had.

                        I wouldn't have necessarily coded this bright line division as autistic but...

                        Katy ElphinstoneK This user is from outside of this forum
                        Katy ElphinstoneK This user is from outside of this forum
                        Katy Elphinstone
                        wrote last edited by
                        #91

                        @gooba42

                        Ooh beautifully put!! I'm bookmarking your post so I don't forget.

                        UrzlG 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • Katy ElphinstoneK Katy Elphinstone

                          Within this frame, prioritizing outcomes over intentions is coded as a moral error...

                          A lack of understanding about the situation and about other people.

                          Even though, for the person who’s now dead, intentions make very little difference, while the outcome has been quite important to them.

                          ⬇️

                          CavyherdC This user is from outside of this forum
                          CavyherdC This user is from outside of this forum
                          Cavyherd
                          wrote last edited by
                          #92

                          @KatyElphinstone

                          Have you encountered this analysis? It feels like it's relevant:

                          https://blog.izs.me/2025/11/ogc-1-what-is-occult-grammar/

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Vinnie (any)G Vinnie (any)

                            @KatyElphinstone from my point of view, you're 100% correct in your take. They leave out a lot of information because they want to isolate the issue, but they forget that they need to do so in a way that doesn't make the test overly vague. It would have been simply resolved by defining 'blame' or by explicitly stating that punishment is part of assigning blame here.

                            CavyherdC This user is from outside of this forum
                            CavyherdC This user is from outside of this forum
                            Cavyherd
                            wrote last edited by
                            #93

                            @greenWhale @KatyElphinstone

                            Our culture generally tends to conflate punishment, deterrence, & retribution, with all sorts of nasty results. I think Katy's analysis above neatly unpacks that.

                            ETA: Oh, I forgot a fourth one: restraint. It does makes a certain amount of sense to keep some offenders off the street. But if that's your primary method of managing offenses...you've got the wrong end of the stick.

                            Katy ElphinstoneK 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • CynAq🤘C CynAq🤘

                              @KatyElphinstone your analysis of the situation is spot on I think. I really vibe with the blame vs responsibility distinction. Sally is inherently responsible having decided to make her opinion known which influenced her friend’s action. The friend is also responsible for her own actions. It wouldn’t even occur to me to look for blame in a situation like this unless I was forced to.

                              Before I read the thread, with only the information in the first two posts, my impression of this test was that it trivializes a fairly complex moral conundrum.

                              I feel this is the case for a lot of assessment type studies that have hypothetical scenarios and questionnaires like this. The questions always leave enormous elephants in the room, begging the reply “it depends”.

                              Katy ElphinstoneK This user is from outside of this forum
                              Katy ElphinstoneK This user is from outside of this forum
                              Katy Elphinstone
                              wrote last edited by
                              #94

                              @CynAq

                              Thanks for this. My way of answering a lot of conundrums is "that depends" 😂

                              Or even... "That depends on how we define [...]"

                              So much that my kids would often answer for me lol

                              Also I wanted to say sorry for changing the name from Sally to Janet. I realised there were a bunch of jellyfish studies, and in the one with the swimming the name given is Janet. Making it look like you're responding randomly with a different name. My sincere apologies for that!

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • CavyherdC Cavyherd

                                @greenWhale @KatyElphinstone

                                Our culture generally tends to conflate punishment, deterrence, & retribution, with all sorts of nasty results. I think Katy's analysis above neatly unpacks that.

                                ETA: Oh, I forgot a fourth one: restraint. It does makes a certain amount of sense to keep some offenders off the street. But if that's your primary method of managing offenses...you've got the wrong end of the stick.

                                Katy ElphinstoneK This user is from outside of this forum
                                Katy ElphinstoneK This user is from outside of this forum
                                Katy Elphinstone
                                wrote last edited by
                                #95

                                @cavyherd

                                Exactly 💯 this.

                                And while the deterrence makes sense and is useful, the other things don't and aren't.

                                Ah... except perhaps for the purpose of maintaining power structures and the status quo 🤷‍♀️

                                (I'm laughing as I write this, and thinking, "ah, no wonder people don't like us" - especially privileged ones who like their position)

                                #ActuallyAutistic

                                @greenWhale

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • Katy ElphinstoneK Katy Elphinstone

                                  @gwenthefops

                                  I so agree about knowing the edge of your knowledge. At least a little humility...

                                  @sinvega

                                  Leszek CiesielskiS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  Leszek CiesielskiS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  Leszek Ciesielski
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #96

                                  @KatyElphinstone @gwenthefops @sinvega And that's something I feel immediately distances me from normies: most people like a confident idiot. They feel safe. Meanwhile, such behaviour makes all my alarm bells ring.

                                  Sometimes I wonder if it helps or makes it worse, that I work in a field where knowing what you don't know is perhaps the most important skill. I've used to run job interviews explicitly rigged so that the applicant can't know the answers to some questions. If you bullshit, you're out. I can't trust you.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • Katy ElphinstoneK Katy Elphinstone

                                    Have you wondered where the claim that autistic people lack empathy came from?

                                    The “jellyfish” study (2011) was influential in this, as it concluded that autistic people lacked Theory of Mind & capacity for moral reasoning.

                                    https://medicalxpress.com/news/2011-01-autistic-mind.html

                                    In the fictional scenario given to participants, Sally tells a friend it’s safe to swim with jellyfish. She believes they’re harmless. The friend is stung and dies.

                                    ⬇️

                                    #Autism #Empathy #Neurodiversity #Psychology #TheoryofMind #ActuallyAutistic

                                    HierarchyH This user is from outside of this forum
                                    HierarchyH This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Hierarchy
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #97

                                    @KatyElphinstone hello. I have question. Is it possible for autistic person to have a lot of empathy but hard time expressing it?

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • Jens FinkhäuserJ Jens Finkhäuser

                                      @KatyElphinstone "those with a milder form of autism such as Asperger's syndrome, often develop compensatory mechanisms to deal with their difficulties in understanding other people's thoughts. The details of these mechanisms are unknown"

                                      The mechanisms are "unknown"? They're observation and deduction, forced on by having to figure out your illogical shit with no help from you and no manual.

                                      What a twerp. They're supposed to be a scientist, and have this shit down.

                                      Cthulhu weeps, that's bad.

                                      Not a Spring OnionW This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Not a Spring OnionW This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Not a Spring Onion
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #98

                                      @jens @KatyElphinstone

                                      Sadly, in medicine, "science" often boils down to "the consensus between three neurotypical men".

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • JackieB Jackie

                                        @KatyElphinstone she logically is responsible for her friends death because jellyfish are deadly and this is well known

                                        hazelnot :yell:H This user is from outside of this forum
                                        hazelnot :yell:H This user is from outside of this forum
                                        hazelnot :yell:
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #99

                                        @burnoutqueen @KatyElphinstone I thought only *some* species are dangerous?

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • Katy ElphinstoneK Katy Elphinstone

                                          Autistic people, after all, are known for preferring logic (I certainly do).

                                          And we’re also known for thinking outside the box – meaning that if we’re forced to make false decisions based on faulty assumptions, then we are quite likely to make the ‘wrong’ choice.

                                          Interested to hear others’ thoughts on this! And I’ll be looking for another influential study to look closely at.

                                          I really enjoy analyzing things! 😊

                                          End of thread. 🧵

                                          KirK This user is from outside of this forum
                                          KirK This user is from outside of this forum
                                          Kir
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #100

                                          @KatyElphinstone
                                          I read the article before reading your posts and I 100% agree.
                                          The paper seemed so simplicistic to me.

                                          I don't understand how could anyone trying to deduct mental functioning based on that.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups