Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. This is one of the worst takes from LLM enthusiasts.

This is one of the worst takes from LLM enthusiasts.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
74 Posts 56 Posters 39 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Miguel ArrozA Miguel Arroz

    RE: https://mastodon.social/@stroughtonsmith/116030136026775832

    This is one of the worst takes from LLM enthusiasts.

    Compilers are deterministic, extremely well tested, made out of incredibly detailed specifications debated for months and properly formalized.

    LLMs are random content generators with a whole lot of automatically trained heuristics. They can produce literally anything. Not a single person who built them can predict what the output will be for a given input.

    Comparing both is a display of ignorance and dishonesty.

    [object Object]Z This user is from outside of this forum
    [object Object]Z This user is from outside of this forum
    [object Object]
    wrote last edited by
    #16

    @arroz it’s always a bit depressing when I find out about a new pocket of mediocre tech jackasses posting twitter crap on masto. all of the guys posting “LLMs are like compilers for natural language” should have their CS degrees yanked cause they’ve proven they don’t meet the academic requirements for a CS undergrad.

    [object Object]Z Orb 2069O Darby LinesA 3 Replies Last reply
    0
    • Miguel ArrozA Miguel Arroz

      RE: https://mastodon.social/@stroughtonsmith/116030136026775832

      This is one of the worst takes from LLM enthusiasts.

      Compilers are deterministic, extremely well tested, made out of incredibly detailed specifications debated for months and properly formalized.

      LLMs are random content generators with a whole lot of automatically trained heuristics. They can produce literally anything. Not a single person who built them can predict what the output will be for a given input.

      Comparing both is a display of ignorance and dishonesty.

      David GerardD This user is from outside of this forum
      David GerardD This user is from outside of this forum
      David Gerard
      wrote last edited by
      #17

      @arroz it's like watching bitcoiners talk about how they think money works

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • [object Object]Z [object Object]

        @arroz it’s always a bit depressing when I find out about a new pocket of mediocre tech jackasses posting twitter crap on masto. all of the guys posting “LLMs are like compilers for natural language” should have their CS degrees yanked cause they’ve proven they don’t meet the academic requirements for a CS undergrad.

        [object Object]Z This user is from outside of this forum
        [object Object]Z This user is from outside of this forum
        [object Object]
        wrote last edited by
        #18

        @arroz “LLMs are natural language compilers”, brought to you by the same kids insisting their product is “the operating system for the web” because nothing means anything if you ignore all implementation and engineering details

        Amber :neodog_box:P AnthonyA ChrisT 3 Replies Last reply
        0
        • [object Object]Z [object Object]

          @arroz “LLMs are natural language compilers”, brought to you by the same kids insisting their product is “the operating system for the web” because nothing means anything if you ignore all implementation and engineering details

          Amber :neodog_box:P This user is from outside of this forum
          Amber :neodog_box:P This user is from outside of this forum
          Amber :neodog_box:
          wrote last edited by
          #19

          @zzt@mas.to @arroz@mastodon.social Ah because if it's one thing compilers are known for it's being non-deterministic 😭

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • PositivDenken 🤯Z PositivDenken 🤯

            @arroz @dmitriid now that eating out of dumpsters exists, no one ever‘s gonna want to prepare a proper meal anymore!

            George BG This user is from outside of this forum
            George BG This user is from outside of this forum
            George B
            wrote last edited by
            #20

            @arroz @dmitriid @zeank

            Have you seen https://www.colincornaby.me/2025/08/in-the-future-all-food-will-be-cooked-in-a-microwave-and-if-you-cant-deal-with-that-then-you-need-to-get-out-of-the-kitchen/

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Miguel ArrozA Miguel Arroz

              RE: https://mastodon.social/@stroughtonsmith/116030136026775832

              This is one of the worst takes from LLM enthusiasts.

              Compilers are deterministic, extremely well tested, made out of incredibly detailed specifications debated for months and properly formalized.

              LLMs are random content generators with a whole lot of automatically trained heuristics. They can produce literally anything. Not a single person who built them can predict what the output will be for a given input.

              Comparing both is a display of ignorance and dishonesty.

              Cap E BaraC This user is from outside of this forum
              Cap E BaraC This user is from outside of this forum
              Cap E Bara
              wrote last edited by
              #21

              @arroz @stroughtonsmith that take you reposted is hella embarassing. thanks for pointing out another slop enthusiast to mute!

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Miguel ArrozA Miguel Arroz

                RE: https://mastodon.social/@stroughtonsmith/116030136026775832

                This is one of the worst takes from LLM enthusiasts.

                Compilers are deterministic, extremely well tested, made out of incredibly detailed specifications debated for months and properly formalized.

                LLMs are random content generators with a whole lot of automatically trained heuristics. They can produce literally anything. Not a single person who built them can predict what the output will be for a given input.

                Comparing both is a display of ignorance and dishonesty.

                Duke of Germany 💫D This user is from outside of this forum
                Duke of Germany 💫D This user is from outside of this forum
                Duke of Germany 💫
                wrote last edited by
                #22

                What I see a lot in these AI guy circles is this kind of "magical thinking" about how things work.

                And these (confidently expressed) naive takes are not only about LLMs, but also about countless other well-documented, well-researched topics like compilers.

                Who are these guys?

                @arroz

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Miguel ArrozA Miguel Arroz

                  RE: https://mastodon.social/@stroughtonsmith/116030136026775832

                  This is one of the worst takes from LLM enthusiasts.

                  Compilers are deterministic, extremely well tested, made out of incredibly detailed specifications debated for months and properly formalized.

                  LLMs are random content generators with a whole lot of automatically trained heuristics. They can produce literally anything. Not a single person who built them can predict what the output will be for a given input.

                  Comparing both is a display of ignorance and dishonesty.

                  LobsterL This user is from outside of this forum
                  LobsterL This user is from outside of this forum
                  Lobster
                  wrote last edited by
                  #23

                  @arroz To be honest, the whole take of the original post reads like slop. LLMs tend to conflate different concepts with each other and if you have no idea what you’re talking about, it will sound very convincing.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Geoff WozniakG Geoff Wozniak

                    @arroz That take is another case of only considering the result, not why the result exists.

                    Also, I guess he's fine with outsourcing his "compiling" to a third party to which he has absolutely no control over.

                    Vibecoders are only interested in production. They don't care how they get there.

                    Jim JonesG This user is from outside of this forum
                    Jim JonesG This user is from outside of this forum
                    Jim Jones
                    wrote last edited by
                    #24

                    @GeoffWozniak @arroz

                    Looks like CWE's are back on the menu!

                    https://blog.vidocsecurity.com/blog/vibe-coding-security-vulnerabilities

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • [object Object]Z [object Object]

                      @arroz it’s always a bit depressing when I find out about a new pocket of mediocre tech jackasses posting twitter crap on masto. all of the guys posting “LLMs are like compilers for natural language” should have their CS degrees yanked cause they’ve proven they don’t meet the academic requirements for a CS undergrad.

                      Orb 2069O This user is from outside of this forum
                      Orb 2069O This user is from outside of this forum
                      Orb 2069
                      wrote last edited by
                      #25

                      @zzt @arroz

                      Imagine if CS was like ANY other engineering discipline.

                      Preston Maness ☭A Ivor HewittI 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • Orb 2069O Orb 2069

                        @zzt @arroz

                        Imagine if CS was like ANY other engineering discipline.

                        Preston Maness ☭A This user is from outside of this forum
                        Preston Maness ☭A This user is from outside of this forum
                        Preston Maness ☭
                        wrote last edited by
                        #26

                        @Orb2069 @zzt @arroz I find that exercise preferable to imagining other engineering disciplines becoming more like CS.

                        Orb 2069O 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • Preston Maness ☭A Preston Maness ☭

                          @Orb2069 @zzt @arroz I find that exercise preferable to imagining other engineering disciplines becoming more like CS.

                          Orb 2069O This user is from outside of this forum
                          Orb 2069O This user is from outside of this forum
                          Orb 2069
                          wrote last edited by
                          #27

                          @aspensmonster @zzt @arroz

                          Vibe coded skyscrapers.

                          LeszekM random thoughtsH 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • Miguel ArrozA Miguel Arroz

                            RE: https://mastodon.social/@stroughtonsmith/116030136026775832

                            This is one of the worst takes from LLM enthusiasts.

                            Compilers are deterministic, extremely well tested, made out of incredibly detailed specifications debated for months and properly formalized.

                            LLMs are random content generators with a whole lot of automatically trained heuristics. They can produce literally anything. Not a single person who built them can predict what the output will be for a given input.

                            Comparing both is a display of ignorance and dishonesty.

                            Joel VanderWerfJ This user is from outside of this forum
                            Joel VanderWerfJ This user is from outside of this forum
                            Joel VanderWerf
                            wrote last edited by
                            #28

                            @arroz How does he think source-level debuggers will work under that analogy?

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • Miguel ArrozA Miguel Arroz

                              RE: https://mastodon.social/@stroughtonsmith/116030136026775832

                              This is one of the worst takes from LLM enthusiasts.

                              Compilers are deterministic, extremely well tested, made out of incredibly detailed specifications debated for months and properly formalized.

                              LLMs are random content generators with a whole lot of automatically trained heuristics. They can produce literally anything. Not a single person who built them can predict what the output will be for a given input.

                              Comparing both is a display of ignorance and dishonesty.

                              mwolakM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mwolakM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mwolak
                              wrote last edited by
                              #29

                              @arroz I know who *will* be manually reviewing the generated code: the people in the black hats.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • [object Object]Z [object Object]

                                @arroz “LLMs are natural language compilers”, brought to you by the same kids insisting their product is “the operating system for the web” because nothing means anything if you ignore all implementation and engineering details

                                AnthonyA This user is from outside of this forum
                                AnthonyA This user is from outside of this forum
                                Anthony
                                wrote last edited by
                                #30
                                @zzt@mas.to @arroz@mastodon.social https://buc.ci/abucci/p/1769891986.847341
                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • Orb 2069O Orb 2069

                                  @aspensmonster @zzt @arroz

                                  Vibe coded skyscrapers.

                                  LeszekM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  LeszekM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  Leszek
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #31

                                  @Orb2069 @aspensmonster @zzt @arroz There was a preview of that. Search the history of highrises in UK, especially the ones built in the 1960s and 1970s.
                                  You can save so much on tall buildings by not building 2 stories of cellars those silly continental architects added to the design. Or you can just copy paste a building on top of itself to double the number of livable floors from 6 to 12, right?

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • [object Object]Z [object Object]

                                    @arroz it’s always a bit depressing when I find out about a new pocket of mediocre tech jackasses posting twitter crap on masto. all of the guys posting “LLMs are like compilers for natural language” should have their CS degrees yanked cause they’ve proven they don’t meet the academic requirements for a CS undergrad.

                                    Darby LinesA This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Darby LinesA This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Darby Lines
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #32

                                    @zzt @arroz The sheer volume of developers that I have lost respect for in the last two years is just staggering.

                                    Sharp Cheddar GoblinS Z 2 Replies Last reply
                                    0
                                    • Darby LinesA Darby Lines

                                      @zzt @arroz The sheer volume of developers that I have lost respect for in the last two years is just staggering.

                                      Sharp Cheddar GoblinS This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Sharp Cheddar GoblinS This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Sharp Cheddar Goblin
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #33

                                      @angry_drunk @zzt @arroz I despise all of my coworkers and the company I work for. I'm just going to retire early when I'm finally let go due to slopcoding and then work on limiting my life's contact with software, since it's all going to be buggy and insecure garbage. I guess I'll be a hermit and write a manifesto.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • Miguel ArrozA Miguel Arroz

                                        RE: https://mastodon.social/@stroughtonsmith/116030136026775832

                                        This is one of the worst takes from LLM enthusiasts.

                                        Compilers are deterministic, extremely well tested, made out of incredibly detailed specifications debated for months and properly formalized.

                                        LLMs are random content generators with a whole lot of automatically trained heuristics. They can produce literally anything. Not a single person who built them can predict what the output will be for a given input.

                                        Comparing both is a display of ignorance and dishonesty.

                                        Very Human RobotS This user is from outside of this forum
                                        Very Human RobotS This user is from outside of this forum
                                        Very Human Robot
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #34

                                        @arroz

                                        The trick is to get the LLM to generate a spec and an acceptance test for the change you want to make, and verify the test.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • Darby LinesA Darby Lines

                                          @zzt @arroz The sheer volume of developers that I have lost respect for in the last two years is just staggering.

                                          Z This user is from outside of this forum
                                          Z This user is from outside of this forum
                                          zygmyd
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #35

                                          @angry_drunk @zzt @arroz

                                          And executives. Seeing who are the bandwagon jumpers and who are being thoughtful about things.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups