Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. The US is threatening #Canada (again) if we don't buy their F-35s.

The US is threatening #Canada (again) if we don't buy their F-35s.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
canadaf35cdnpoli
85 Posts 51 Posters 247 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • JhooperJ Jhooper

    @alessandro @elasticsoul Stop talking for a minute and focus on what my underlying point is: the F-35 is struggling to compete with a plane designed 50 years ago, and the manufacturer and the US government is trying to hide that fact. If you look into the F-35's development, you'll find a long history of broken promises, disappointing performance metrics, and plenty of manufacturer and US military hiding these reports.

    Honestly, if the jet was any good, I don't think the US government would be trying so hard to sell them.

    Alessandro Corazza 🇨🇦A This user is from outside of this forum
    Alessandro Corazza 🇨🇦A This user is from outside of this forum
    Alessandro Corazza 🇨🇦
    wrote last edited by
    #73

    @jhooper

    I understand the point you're trying to make - I just don't understand why you're trying to make it. The A-10 is a low-altitude ground support aircraft, which is literally diametrically opposed to what Canada needs. We're not going to be strafing infantry on Ellesmere island. We need something that can patrol huge swaths of land and has excellent sensor and network capability. The A-10 is a slow tub designed to shoot things you can see with your own eyes.

    As for the issues with the F-35, yes it's had problems, but find me a military procurement project of that scale that hasn't. The fact remains that it's very well suited for our needs, and the closest comparables are either a generation behind (European jets like Gripen, Rafale, etc.) or unobtainable/undesirable (J-20, Su-57)

    I'm not 100% against buying Gripens instead if we can get them ASAP, but their useful life will be shorter.

    @elasticsoul

    Brian GordonE 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Alessandro Corazza 🇨🇦A Alessandro Corazza 🇨🇦

      @jhooper

      I understand the point you're trying to make - I just don't understand why you're trying to make it. The A-10 is a low-altitude ground support aircraft, which is literally diametrically opposed to what Canada needs. We're not going to be strafing infantry on Ellesmere island. We need something that can patrol huge swaths of land and has excellent sensor and network capability. The A-10 is a slow tub designed to shoot things you can see with your own eyes.

      As for the issues with the F-35, yes it's had problems, but find me a military procurement project of that scale that hasn't. The fact remains that it's very well suited for our needs, and the closest comparables are either a generation behind (European jets like Gripen, Rafale, etc.) or unobtainable/undesirable (J-20, Su-57)

      I'm not 100% against buying Gripens instead if we can get them ASAP, but their useful life will be shorter.

      @elasticsoul

      Brian GordonE This user is from outside of this forum
      Brian GordonE This user is from outside of this forum
      Brian Gordon
      wrote last edited by
      #74

      @alessandro @jhooper

      I honestly think that the F-35 should be ruled out on strategic grounds. It requires maintenance that only the US can do, the US cannot be trusted to keep them in the air on Canada’s behalf, and the US is currently the country most likely to invade Canada.

      Alessandro Corazza 🇨🇦A 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Jean-Francois MezeiJ Jean-Francois Mezei

        @DavidM_yeg @elasticsoul @su_liam @troy_frizzell one still needs jets to patrol large areas (like our Arctic or Atlantic coasts). Had USA not shied from helping Ukraine, jets would have bombed every border entry point on day 1 on the 2022 war making it much harder for Russia to invade. Could have been Vee different war. War turned to drones because the west refused to give Ukraine the conventional weapons it needed.

        Brian GordonE This user is from outside of this forum
        Brian GordonE This user is from outside of this forum
        Brian Gordon
        wrote last edited by
        #75

        @jfmezei @DavidM_yeg @su_liam @troy_frizzell

        The war turned to drones because they’re the most economical and useful, not because the West wouldn’t supply jets. I agree 100% with the above posters that drones - air, land, and sea - are the future. They’re vastly more economical, pilots can be trained far more quickly and cheaply, and they can and do take out bigger, expensive hardware. Canada should be partnering with Ukraine to build this tech in Canada.

        Jean-Francois MezeiJ 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Peter BrownP Peter Brown

          @elasticsoul after threatening to invade Canada surely they’re not surprised that they don’t want to buy their planes?

          Brian GordonE This user is from outside of this forum
          Brian GordonE This user is from outside of this forum
          Brian Gordon
          wrote last edited by
          #76

          @peterbrown

          You would think. However, the current US regime is very unaware. I guess that’s what happens when they’re all sociopaths.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • AnnieBuddyA AnnieBuddy

            @pedrobizbikedu @elasticsoul @EricLawton

            Trust is more valuable than the dollar.

            Brian GordonE This user is from outside of this forum
            Brian GordonE This user is from outside of this forum
            Brian Gordon
            wrote last edited by
            #77

            @AnnieBuddy @pedrobizbikedu @EricLawton

            100% correct. And now the Americans have done enough damage to themselves that it looks like the US Dollar is on its way out as the world’s reserve currency. The US is going to be a poorer nation for generations.

            Die Kehrseite #DeSlopYourLifeD 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • De_MinimisD De_Minimis

              @elasticsoul Take the first batch which are coming off the production lines now, cancel the rest. Then go full-on with the Gripen.

              This fulfills the NORAD commitment the nazi's are crying about.

              Brian GordonE This user is from outside of this forum
              Brian GordonE This user is from outside of this forum
              Brian Gordon
              wrote last edited by
              #78

              @De_Minimis

              The thing is, would you trust the Americans to honour NORAD commitments themselves? Can the Americans be trusted to honour any agreements now? It seems clear the answer is no.

              De_MinimisD 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Brian GordonE Brian Gordon

                @alessandro @jhooper

                I honestly think that the F-35 should be ruled out on strategic grounds. It requires maintenance that only the US can do, the US cannot be trusted to keep them in the air on Canada’s behalf, and the US is currently the country most likely to invade Canada.

                Alessandro Corazza 🇨🇦A This user is from outside of this forum
                Alessandro Corazza 🇨🇦A This user is from outside of this forum
                Alessandro Corazza 🇨🇦
                wrote last edited by
                #79

                @elasticsoul

                Those are good reasons - the big question is how likely that overt aggression from the USA is, versus against our current requirements. I don't think we're dark-skinned enough for them to go that far.

                @jhooper

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • AssimilateborgA Assimilateborg

                  @elasticsoul oh... let's play this game:
                  "Because of the US tariffs, Canada has not enough money to buy F-35 Jets"
                  It makes no sense, but Trump does not make sense, so he will understand.

                  FreediverXF This user is from outside of this forum
                  FreediverXF This user is from outside of this forum
                  FreediverX
                  wrote last edited by
                  #80

                  @assimilateborg @elasticsoul
                  As with Europe, he will suggest Canada impose austerity on its citizens and divert funding from public services to military.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Brian GordonE Brian Gordon

                    @De_Minimis

                    The thing is, would you trust the Americans to honour NORAD commitments themselves? Can the Americans be trusted to honour any agreements now? It seems clear the answer is no.

                    De_MinimisD This user is from outside of this forum
                    De_MinimisD This user is from outside of this forum
                    De_Minimis
                    wrote last edited by
                    #81

                    @elasticsoul But you still had to clean your room and take out the garbage as a kid when your parents asked.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Brian GordonE Brian Gordon

                      @jfmezei @DavidM_yeg @su_liam @troy_frizzell

                      The war turned to drones because they’re the most economical and useful, not because the West wouldn’t supply jets. I agree 100% with the above posters that drones - air, land, and sea - are the future. They’re vastly more economical, pilots can be trained far more quickly and cheaply, and they can and do take out bigger, expensive hardware. Canada should be partnering with Ukraine to build this tech in Canada.

                      Jean-Francois MezeiJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      Jean-Francois MezeiJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      Jean-Francois Mezei
                      wrote last edited by
                      #82

                      @elasticsoul @DavidM_yeg @su_liam @troy_frizzell I don't disagree about drones. But you still need jets to patrol large areas. You still need helicopters for search and rescue, or to drop troups off in an area.

                      Military is more than fighting a war.

                      However, if, at very start of the war, the west had provided air defense to bomb any Russians entering Ukraine at the border, the outcome of war would be different. Drones didn't yet exist, though the cruise missiles (glorified and expensive drones) did.

                      David Mitchell :CApride:D 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Brian GordonE Brian Gordon

                        @AnnieBuddy @pedrobizbikedu @EricLawton

                        100% correct. And now the Americans have done enough damage to themselves that it looks like the US Dollar is on its way out as the world’s reserve currency. The US is going to be a poorer nation for generations.

                        Die Kehrseite #DeSlopYourLifeD This user is from outside of this forum
                        Die Kehrseite #DeSlopYourLifeD This user is from outside of this forum
                        Die Kehrseite #DeSlopYourLife
                        wrote last edited by
                        #83

                        @elasticsoul
                        it is already a poor nation. Just take the few superrich from the tableau and you can clearly see a so called 3rdWorld Land.

                        @AnnieBuddy @pedrobizbikedu @EricLawton

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • Jean-Francois MezeiJ Jean-Francois Mezei

                          @elasticsoul @DavidM_yeg @su_liam @troy_frizzell I don't disagree about drones. But you still need jets to patrol large areas. You still need helicopters for search and rescue, or to drop troups off in an area.

                          Military is more than fighting a war.

                          However, if, at very start of the war, the west had provided air defense to bomb any Russians entering Ukraine at the border, the outcome of war would be different. Drones didn't yet exist, though the cruise missiles (glorified and expensive drones) did.

                          David Mitchell :CApride:D This user is from outside of this forum
                          David Mitchell :CApride:D This user is from outside of this forum
                          David Mitchell :CApride:
                          wrote last edited by
                          #84

                          @elasticsoul @jfmezei @su_liam @troy_frizzell

                          I’m curious what a jet patrolling a large area accomplishes that other tools like satellites or surveillance and munitions drones can’t? (We weren’t talking about helicopters or cargo planes, just fighter jets)

                          Jean-Francois MezeiJ 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • David Mitchell :CApride:D David Mitchell :CApride:

                            @elasticsoul @jfmezei @su_liam @troy_frizzell

                            I’m curious what a jet patrolling a large area accomplishes that other tools like satellites or surveillance and munitions drones can’t? (We weren’t talking about helicopters or cargo planes, just fighter jets)

                            Jean-Francois MezeiJ This user is from outside of this forum
                            Jean-Francois MezeiJ This user is from outside of this forum
                            Jean-Francois Mezei
                            wrote last edited by
                            #85

                            @DavidM_yeg @elasticsoul @su_liam @troy_frizzell Satelites useless with cloud cover. Jet can fly low below clouds. And Satellites not always over the area you want during the day. Movies then to give satellites many unreal capabilities.

                            (now, if you have a gazillion spy satelites, odds are greater that one of them will have a pass over the area of interest during the day).

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            0
                            • R AodeRelay shared this topic
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Don't have an account? Register

                            • Login or register to search.
                            Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • World
                            • Users
                            • Groups