Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Have you wondered where the claim that autistic people lack empathy came from?

Have you wondered where the claim that autistic people lack empathy came from?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
actuallyautistitheoryofmindpsychologyneurodiversityempathy
153 Posts 69 Posters 4 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Katy ElphinstoneK Katy Elphinstone

    Have you wondered where the claim that autistic people lack empathy came from?

    The “jellyfish” study (2011) was influential in this, as it concluded that autistic people lacked Theory of Mind & capacity for moral reasoning.

    https://medicalxpress.com/news/2011-01-autistic-mind.html

    In the fictional scenario given to participants, Sally tells a friend it’s safe to swim with jellyfish. She believes they’re harmless. The friend is stung and dies.

    ⬇️

    #Autism #Empathy #Neurodiversity #Psychology #TheoryofMind #ActuallyAutistic

    Blake C. StaceyB This user is from outside of this forum
    Blake C. StaceyB This user is from outside of this forum
    Blake C. Stacey
    wrote last edited by
    #48

    @KatyElphinstone I have always resented hypothetical questions like that and felt the urge to invent scenarios consistent with the given facts that go in both directions. Perhaps relatedly, I've wanted to write fiction since I was a child....

    Scenario 1: Sally has just taken a course on ocean swimming safety, but slacked off and cheated to pass the final.

    Scenario 2: Sally has an abusive parent who has actively deceived Sally about what is and is not safe because they wish her harm.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Katy ElphinstoneK Katy Elphinstone

      Autistic people, after all, are known for preferring logic (I certainly do).

      And we’re also known for thinking outside the box – meaning that if we’re forced to make false decisions based on faulty assumptions, then we are quite likely to make the ‘wrong’ choice.

      Interested to hear others’ thoughts on this! And I’ll be looking for another influential study to look closely at.

      I really enjoy analyzing things! 😊

      End of thread. 🧵

      Goiterzan/Amygdalai LamaP This user is from outside of this forum
      Goiterzan/Amygdalai LamaP This user is from outside of this forum
      Goiterzan/Amygdalai Lama
      wrote last edited by
      #49

      @KatyElphinstone
      .
      Thing is, when I as an Autistic blame someone or something, I’m just identifying the causal chain of events - there’s nothing “moral,” about it.
      .
      It’s a “moral,” matter when you’re planning to punish who or whatever caused the problem. As a lifelong God’s fool sort of Autistic, that isn’t automatic, in fact I try to never punish anyone for anything.
      .
      So “blame,” is a word that means different things to different neurotypes, making these tests faulty from the start. We’re suppose to lack empathy because for them, blaming Sally means hurting Sally, which it doesn’t for me.
      .
      Worse, their version includes punishment, and they think that’s Human Nature and true for everyone so they don’t even try to compensate for that confound.
      🤨😇💜
      .
      #ND #ActuallyAutistic #Autism @autistics

      KirK Goiterzan/Amygdalai LamaP 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • your auntifa liza 🇵🇷  🦛 🦦B your auntifa liza 🇵🇷 🦛 🦦

        what kind of sociopath considers empathy for the dead a sign of disability?

        we are dealing with the limited information we are given. we could speculate outside these parameters but that is most likely not reflected in the answers to choose.

        it’s almost as if the test was created to prove cultural assumptions that say empathy for those we kill with our willful ignorance is a disability.

        @KatyElphinstone

        CynAq🤘C This user is from outside of this forum
        CynAq🤘C This user is from outside of this forum
        CynAq🤘
        wrote last edited by
        #50

        @blogdiva @KatyElphinstone the kind who’s concerned more about their own potential culpability than the fact that people are dead.

        We could be equally callous and assert that neurotypicals are more likely not to blame Sally for the death of her friend because they identify more with the alive person and their self-preservation compels them to deny any responsibility.

        These kinds of studies always end up showing how effed up neurotypical tendencies are.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Katy ElphinstoneK Katy Elphinstone

          Here’s an alternative take.
          (Note: These are just my thoughts, I’m very open to discussion and other suggestions!)

          It may be – though we can’t know this, since participants weren’t asked – that autistic people in the study didn’t lack anything, but rather tended to reason in logical terms.

          ⬇️

          Sin VegaS This user is from outside of this forum
          Sin VegaS This user is from outside of this forum
          Sin Vega
          wrote last edited by
          #51

          @KatyElphinstone there's another angle too: you might consider it a breach of trust to say it was safe when they didn't know, and didn't try to find out. "blame" wouldn't even come into it, but if that's the only thing you're asked....

          Gwen :therian: :neofox_nom_fox_nervous:G 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Katy ElphinstoneK Katy Elphinstone

            Have you wondered where the claim that autistic people lack empathy came from?

            The “jellyfish” study (2011) was influential in this, as it concluded that autistic people lacked Theory of Mind & capacity for moral reasoning.

            https://medicalxpress.com/news/2011-01-autistic-mind.html

            In the fictional scenario given to participants, Sally tells a friend it’s safe to swim with jellyfish. She believes they’re harmless. The friend is stung and dies.

            ⬇️

            #Autism #Empathy #Neurodiversity #Psychology #TheoryofMind #ActuallyAutistic

            australopithecusA This user is from outside of this forum
            australopithecusA This user is from outside of this forum
            australopithecus
            wrote last edited by
            #52

            @KatyElphinstone
            Wow, that's a dumb study. "Are people responsible for accidental harm?" is not an easy ethical problem, dipshits.

            Also, 26 total participants isn't a serious study; it's a passing grade at the undergrad level, at best.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Katy ElphinstoneK Katy Elphinstone

              Autistic participants were more likely than non-autistic participants to say Sally was to blame, despite her good intentions.

              This was interpreted as evidence of faulty moral reasoning or reduced empathy.

              But that conclusion rests on three errors of logic built into the task itself, and not on evidence that autistic people care less about others.

              ⬇️

              JackieB This user is from outside of this forum
              JackieB This user is from outside of this forum
              Jackie
              wrote last edited by
              #53

              @KatyElphinstone she logically is responsible for her friends death because jellyfish are deadly and this is well known

              JackieB hazelnot :yell:H 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • JackieB Jackie

                @KatyElphinstone she logically is responsible for her friends death because jellyfish are deadly and this is well known

                JackieB This user is from outside of this forum
                JackieB This user is from outside of this forum
                Jackie
                wrote last edited by
                #54

                @KatyElphinstone like, I knew that as a kid

                JackieB 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • JackieB Jackie

                  @KatyElphinstone like, I knew that as a kid

                  JackieB This user is from outside of this forum
                  JackieB This user is from outside of this forum
                  Jackie
                  wrote last edited by
                  #55

                  @KatyElphinstone sally is unintelligent

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Katy ElphinstoneK Katy Elphinstone

                    Have you wondered where the claim that autistic people lack empathy came from?

                    The “jellyfish” study (2011) was influential in this, as it concluded that autistic people lacked Theory of Mind & capacity for moral reasoning.

                    https://medicalxpress.com/news/2011-01-autistic-mind.html

                    In the fictional scenario given to participants, Sally tells a friend it’s safe to swim with jellyfish. She believes they’re harmless. The friend is stung and dies.

                    ⬇️

                    #Autism #Empathy #Neurodiversity #Psychology #TheoryofMind #ActuallyAutistic

                    Kim Spence-Jones 🇬🇧😷K This user is from outside of this forum
                    Kim Spence-Jones 🇬🇧😷K This user is from outside of this forum
                    Kim Spence-Jones 🇬🇧😷
                    wrote last edited by
                    #56

                    @KatyElphinstone
                    In my book, both girls share blame for taking on trust a statement at odds with general knowledge of jellyfish (the fact that the question was asked indicates that the possibility of danger was recognised). The originator of the ‘it’s safe’ information also takes a big share of the blame, but Sally gets extra blame for misjudging the trustworthiness of her informant.
                    In the real world, blame is rarely completely binary.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Katy ElphinstoneK Katy Elphinstone

                      Have you wondered where the claim that autistic people lack empathy came from?

                      The “jellyfish” study (2011) was influential in this, as it concluded that autistic people lacked Theory of Mind & capacity for moral reasoning.

                      https://medicalxpress.com/news/2011-01-autistic-mind.html

                      In the fictional scenario given to participants, Sally tells a friend it’s safe to swim with jellyfish. She believes they’re harmless. The friend is stung and dies.

                      ⬇️

                      #Autism #Empathy #Neurodiversity #Psychology #TheoryofMind #ActuallyAutistic

                      jiub :v_enby: :v_trans: :v_est:J This user is from outside of this forum
                      jiub :v_enby: :v_trans: :v_est:J This user is from outside of this forum
                      jiub :v_enby: :v_trans: :v_est:
                      wrote last edited by
                      #57

                      @KatyElphinstone@mas.to what a ridiculous study!

                      if sally read that it was safe to jump in front of a moving train, it's clearly her fault if she convinces janet that's safe

                      it's not
                      this obvious that jellyfish can be deadly, but they have giant stingers ffs and it's common knowledge that getting stung by a jellyfish hurts. so i could definitely see assigning sally a portion of the blame even if she didn't intend for janet to be harmed

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Katy ElphinstoneK Katy Elphinstone

                        I’ve noticed that being innocent of knowledge is a good defense for many crimes in our society.

                        Those with the most power to change things seem to often be the most innocent of knowledge.

                        While people who are marginalized, discriminated against, and who don’t have much in the way of resources, influence, or free time...

                        ⬇️

                        LisPiL This user is from outside of this forum
                        LisPiL This user is from outside of this forum
                        LisPi
                        wrote last edited by
                        #58

                        @KatyElphinstone@mas.to Which is bizarre. Confidently making assertions one lacks the knowledge to say for sure (or without adequate explanation of one's knowledge and its limits) certainly is something one is to blame for.

                        Sure it's quite different from setting out to murder the other (for funsies, I guess) in the first place, but that was never the question.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • Katy ElphinstoneK Katy Elphinstone

                          This would mean:

                          - responsibility should be proportional to agency, influence, and ability to change outcomes (this would be not just logical but also extremely useful),

                          - individual / exclusive moral condemnation or punishment is not required in all situations where harm occurs,

                          - responsibility to take appropriate action is not the same thing as blame, and conflating the two is an error.

                          ⬇️

                          LisPiL This user is from outside of this forum
                          LisPiL This user is from outside of this forum
                          LisPi
                          wrote last edited by
                          #59
                          @KatyElphinstone > - individual / exclusive moral condemnation or punishment is not required in all situations where harm occurs,

                          Presumably if she actually liked that friend and truly thought (unjustifiedly) that it was safe, losing the friend is more than punishment enough. Rather, it is likely to be quite traumatic.
                          Katy ElphinstoneK 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Katy ElphinstoneK Katy Elphinstone

                            Have you wondered where the claim that autistic people lack empathy came from?

                            The “jellyfish” study (2011) was influential in this, as it concluded that autistic people lacked Theory of Mind & capacity for moral reasoning.

                            https://medicalxpress.com/news/2011-01-autistic-mind.html

                            In the fictional scenario given to participants, Sally tells a friend it’s safe to swim with jellyfish. She believes they’re harmless. The friend is stung and dies.

                            ⬇️

                            #Autism #Empathy #Neurodiversity #Psychology #TheoryofMind #ActuallyAutistic

                            Eric LawtonE This user is from outside of this forum
                            Eric LawtonE This user is from outside of this forum
                            Eric Lawton
                            wrote last edited by
                            #60

                            @KatyElphinstone

                            There are a lot of people in the USA telling others that
                            - there's no climate crisis
                            - vaccines are dangerous
                            - immigrants are taking all the wealth
                            - greed is good
                            - …

                            Causing a lot of serious harm, including death.

                            Yet most of them are not autistic. But do lack moral reasoning.

                            @alice

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • LisPiL LisPi
                              @KatyElphinstone > - individual / exclusive moral condemnation or punishment is not required in all situations where harm occurs,

                              Presumably if she actually liked that friend and truly thought (unjustifiedly) that it was safe, losing the friend is more than punishment enough. Rather, it is likely to be quite traumatic.
                              Katy ElphinstoneK This user is from outside of this forum
                              Katy ElphinstoneK This user is from outside of this forum
                              Katy Elphinstone
                              wrote last edited by
                              #61

                              @lispi314

                              Goodness yes 😢

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • graG gra

                                @thatfrisiangirlish @KatyElphinstone Depressingly true. People think I'm gloomy or misanthropic because I paint what I think are accurate, dispassionate pictures of folks' behaviour.

                                And yet, I somehow still seem to be more (cautiously) optimistic in my interactions with strangers than lots of NT people where preconception seems to shape reality.

                                That Frisian Girl-ishT This user is from outside of this forum
                                That Frisian Girl-ishT This user is from outside of this forum
                                That Frisian Girl-ish
                                wrote last edited by
                                #62

                                @gra@hachyderm.io I mean, same? Just because I can model pretty well the general response of society, that doesn't mean I agree, endorse, and act according to that. Because that would be depressing as fuck. @KatyElphinstone@mas.to

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • Katy ElphinstoneK Katy Elphinstone

                                  Have you wondered where the claim that autistic people lack empathy came from?

                                  The “jellyfish” study (2011) was influential in this, as it concluded that autistic people lacked Theory of Mind & capacity for moral reasoning.

                                  https://medicalxpress.com/news/2011-01-autistic-mind.html

                                  In the fictional scenario given to participants, Sally tells a friend it’s safe to swim with jellyfish. She believes they’re harmless. The friend is stung and dies.

                                  ⬇️

                                  #Autism #Empathy #Neurodiversity #Psychology #TheoryofMind #ActuallyAutistic

                                  J. R. DePriest :verified_trans: :donor: :Moopsy: :EA DATA. SF:J This user is from outside of this forum
                                  J. R. DePriest :verified_trans: :donor: :Moopsy: :EA DATA. SF:J This user is from outside of this forum
                                  J. R. DePriest :verified_trans: :donor: :Moopsy: :EA DATA. SF:
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #63

                                  @KatyElphinstone

                                  In the fictional scenario given to participants, Sally tells a friend it’s safe to swim with jellyfish. She believes they’re harmless. The friend is stung and dies.

                                  Without additional context, I am left to assume that Sally is in no way qualified to advise anyone on whether or not "it's safe". The correct thing for Sally to have told her friend that she could not offer any sort of authoritative assessment of the situation and her decision is whether her own.

                                  Also, did the friend approach Sally and explicitly ask for her opinion or did Sally just blurt out "hey, it's safe to swim with jellyfish!" without being prompted? That would be an important thing to know.

                                  Either way, Sally was wrong to tell her friend it's safe. She should be far more careful with her words.

                                  Edit: "despite her good intentions". There is not enough information for the reader to infer that Sally's intentions are "good".

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • Sin VegaS Sin Vega

                                    @KatyElphinstone there's another angle too: you might consider it a breach of trust to say it was safe when they didn't know, and didn't try to find out. "blame" wouldn't even come into it, but if that's the only thing you're asked....

                                    Gwen :therian: :neofox_nom_fox_nervous:G This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Gwen :therian: :neofox_nom_fox_nervous:G This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Gwen :therian: :neofox_nom_fox_nervous:
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #64

                                    @sinvega@mas.to @KatyElphinstone@mas.to I started with a message lower in the thread. Once I read the context, my immediate reaction was to say, out loud, "wtf, she shouldn't be asserting things if she doesn't know"

                                    Like yeah, I think she is responsible, because her lack of double checking is what led to the outcome. Does that mean I want something to be done? Hell no! At most this is a cautionary tale of why you should always know the edge of your knowledge, nothing more

                                    Katy ElphinstoneK 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • Katy ElphinstoneK Katy Elphinstone

                                      Have you wondered where the claim that autistic people lack empathy came from?

                                      The “jellyfish” study (2011) was influential in this, as it concluded that autistic people lacked Theory of Mind & capacity for moral reasoning.

                                      https://medicalxpress.com/news/2011-01-autistic-mind.html

                                      In the fictional scenario given to participants, Sally tells a friend it’s safe to swim with jellyfish. She believes they’re harmless. The friend is stung and dies.

                                      ⬇️

                                      #Autism #Empathy #Neurodiversity #Psychology #TheoryofMind #ActuallyAutistic

                                      Miakoda :neurodiversity:H This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Miakoda :neurodiversity:H This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Miakoda :neurodiversity:
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #65

                                      @KatyElphinstone I'm autistic. I'm empathtic enough that someone else's misery makes me feel miserable. When I say I want everyone to be ok, not only do I care about the well being of others, it also would improve my own quality of life. The pain and suffering of other people hurts me.

                                      Katy ElphinstoneK 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • Katy ElphinstoneK Katy Elphinstone

                                        Autistic people, after all, are known for preferring logic (I certainly do).

                                        And we’re also known for thinking outside the box – meaning that if we’re forced to make false decisions based on faulty assumptions, then we are quite likely to make the ‘wrong’ choice.

                                        Interested to hear others’ thoughts on this! And I’ll be looking for another influential study to look closely at.

                                        I really enjoy analyzing things! 😊

                                        End of thread. 🧵

                                        UrzlG This user is from outside of this forum
                                        UrzlG This user is from outside of this forum
                                        Urzl
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #66

                                        @KatyElphinstone I have explicitly argued more than once that we have two different concepts that are routinely conflated in broader society, excuses and reasons.

                                        An excuse is an ethical justification for a thing.
                                        A reason is a logical justification for a thing.

                                        If I acknowledged that theft is logically justified by lack of wealth, whether that entails an excuse is an entirely other argument to be had.

                                        I wouldn't have necessarily coded this bright line division as autistic but...

                                        Katy ElphinstoneK 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • Katy ElphinstoneK Katy Elphinstone

                                          Have you wondered where the claim that autistic people lack empathy came from?

                                          The “jellyfish” study (2011) was influential in this, as it concluded that autistic people lacked Theory of Mind & capacity for moral reasoning.

                                          https://medicalxpress.com/news/2011-01-autistic-mind.html

                                          In the fictional scenario given to participants, Sally tells a friend it’s safe to swim with jellyfish. She believes they’re harmless. The friend is stung and dies.

                                          ⬇️

                                          #Autism #Empathy #Neurodiversity #Psychology #TheoryofMind #ActuallyAutistic

                                          :NonBinary: ジギーくんZ This user is from outside of this forum
                                          :NonBinary: ジギーくんZ This user is from outside of this forum
                                          :NonBinary: ジギーくん
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #67

                                          @KatyElphinstone My mom used to say "The way to hell is paved with good intentions".

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups