Should citizens of your country that live elsewhere have the right to vote?

@evan I'm an American-Swiss, and hopefully will soon be just Swiss.

I strongly believe that emmigrants like you @evan and me should be able to vote in elections back "home", however let's face the facts. My current USA voting rights are based in my college town, a leftist bastion in a Democratic State in a Republican district.

In the time that I've been voting from abroad my vote has had no impact whatever on the outcome.

Just let me out of this madness, OK?

@evan I am a citizen of my country living elsewhere (for nearly 17 years) and I said "no". Ireland has a huge diaspora, many of whom have never been there and don't understand the country or its culture. It broke my heart to miss out on the historic referendums legalising gay marriage (the first country in the world to do so by popular vote) and abortion, but it's the price I pay for leaving.

@evan we should vote only where we live

@evan my “Yes But” response is based on two things which essentially amount to: do they have skin in the game?

1. For nations that impose tax on citizens living avoid abroad I firmly believe in the concept of “no taxation without representation”
2. For nations that do not impose tax on citizens living abroad, I believe there is value in implementing a test based on propinquity, i.e. has the citizen lived in the home nation for a certain number of years cumulative; does the citizen have close ties such as property ownership, close family, employment, etc.

My thinking is that I don’t appreciate citizens who have no practical ties to this nation influencing decisions that impact me but not them.

@evan Whelp, guess my answer doesn't match what I mean now... should be "Yes, but..."

> in the US, where the idea that you would retain any sense of belonging to your country of origin was considered at the very least backwards and ungrateful

@evan Interesting. It has been my impression my whole life that the US is the foremost place in the world where people maintain their heritage for generations, cluster in subcultures and call themselves e.g. Irish-American.

In Sweden in the 80s, children of immigrants were expected to assimilate, call themselves Swedish and drop all other ethnic identity.

These days, it's more common to embrace multiculturality, a concept that to me comes from the US, and call yourself e.g. "100% Kurdish, 100% Swedish".

@mayintoronto @fabio @renata

@the_moep why?

@wjmaggos @evan People living abroad are still hugely affected by the decisions made by their government back home. My entire rights & basis for living in my home are governed by foreign policy & by bilateral agreements between governments. Things like pension policy are also hugely relevant given I don't have permanent rights in my residence country. Should I not get any say in how my passport-country approaches those issues?

@wjmaggos @evan (Whereas conversely my country of residence is where I live and pay the large majority of my taxes to and use more public services & transport).

@mpjgregoire @evan @stinerman I was having a discussion about this recently: I agree it's a better model. Though if the UK implemented the French style system there's a downside for my stress insofar as there'd genuinely be a solid chance I'd end up running for whichever seat contained Austria...

@alisonw @evan Because that country still gets to govern my life?

Voting isn't a privilege, it's the right of the governed to have a say in their governance. Britain (in my case) has not stopped having a huge impact on my life just because I'm not living there. Governance isn't just taxes - it's things like the bilateral agreements that underpin the basis for my work and home, and it's the fact that because I'm not a citizen elsewhere the UK is always the country I'd have to return to.

@JubalBarca @evan

so you should be able to declare your home where you last lived in your origin country and get to vote there only imo.

@the_moep I think the wording was "expatriate citizens".