Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. New FCC filing by SpaceX for constellation of million data center satellites for AI apps.

New FCC filing by SpaceX for constellation of million data center satellites for AI apps.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
37 Posts 25 Posters 77 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Donald BallD Donald Ball

    @AkaSci @sundogplanets Nothing about this makes any practical sense from a computer engineering perspective.

    Walrus 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿W This user is from outside of this forum
    Walrus 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿W This user is from outside of this forum
    Walrus 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿
    wrote last edited by
    #7

    @donaldball @AkaSci @sundogplanets

    Epstein's chum, Chainsaw Boy, needs to lay off the Ketamine.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Kierkethumbs up convincinglyK Kierkethumbs up convincingly

      @AkaSci lmao kardashev 2??

      AkaSci 🛰️A This user is from outside of this forum
      AkaSci 🛰️A This user is from outside of this forum
      AkaSci 🛰️
      wrote last edited by
      #8

      @Kierkegaanks
      Kardashian ii perhaps?
      😜

      Kierkethumbs up convincinglyK 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • AkaSci 🛰️A AkaSci 🛰️

        New FCC filing by SpaceX for constellation of million data center satellites for AI apps.

        # of sats: up to 1 million!
        Orbit: 500 km and 2,000 km altitude and 30°inclinations. Multiple orbital shells 50 km apart.
        Cooling: radiative
        Schedule: unspecified
        Sat size, weight, power, cost, ..: unspecified
        Launches: millions of tons of mass per year

        There goes the neighborhood.
        Or is this just marketing fluff and orbital hoarding?

        @sundogplanets
        https://www.scribd.com/document/990116826/Orbital-Data-Center-LOA-Narrative
        https://fccprod.servicenowservices.com/icfs?id=ibfs_application_summary&number=SAT-LOA-20260108-00016
        1/n

        Rob PumphreyR This user is from outside of this forum
        Rob PumphreyR This user is from outside of this forum
        Rob Pumphrey
        wrote last edited by
        #9

        @AkaSci @sundogplanets
        You have got to hope this is about as practical as a hyperloop.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • AkaSci 🛰️A AkaSci 🛰️

          @Kierkegaanks
          Kardashian ii perhaps?
          😜

          Kierkethumbs up convincinglyK This user is from outside of this forum
          Kierkethumbs up convincinglyK This user is from outside of this forum
          Kierkethumbs up convincingly
          wrote last edited by
          #10

          @AkaSci full kardashev 3 in 18-36 months

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • AkaSci 🛰️A AkaSci 🛰️

            To keep the clueless masses intoxicated, SpaceX threw in these flowery words in the FCC filing -

            "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step towards becoming a Kardashev II-level civilization—one that can harness the Sun’s full power—while supporting AI-driven applications for billions of people today and ensuring humanity’s multi-planetary future amongst the stars."

            Earth must be destroyed to save it?

            https://www.scribd.com/document/990116826/Orbital-Data-Center-LOA-Narrative
            2/n

            Judy SchmidtG This user is from outside of this forum
            Judy SchmidtG This user is from outside of this forum
            Judy Schmidt
            wrote last edited by
            #11

            @AkaSci his hubris is insufferable

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • AkaSci 🛰️A AkaSci 🛰️

              New FCC filing by SpaceX for constellation of million data center satellites for AI apps.

              # of sats: up to 1 million!
              Orbit: 500 km and 2,000 km altitude and 30°inclinations. Multiple orbital shells 50 km apart.
              Cooling: radiative
              Schedule: unspecified
              Sat size, weight, power, cost, ..: unspecified
              Launches: millions of tons of mass per year

              There goes the neighborhood.
              Or is this just marketing fluff and orbital hoarding?

              @sundogplanets
              https://www.scribd.com/document/990116826/Orbital-Data-Center-LOA-Narrative
              https://fccprod.servicenowservices.com/icfs?id=ibfs_application_summary&number=SAT-LOA-20260108-00016
              1/n

              Ray McCarthyR This user is from outside of this forum
              Ray McCarthyR This user is from outside of this forum
              Ray McCarthy
              wrote last edited by
              #12

              @AkaSci @sundogplanets
              BONKERS!

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • AkaSci 🛰️A AkaSci 🛰️

                To keep the clueless masses intoxicated, SpaceX threw in these flowery words in the FCC filing -

                "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step towards becoming a Kardashev II-level civilization—one that can harness the Sun’s full power—while supporting AI-driven applications for billions of people today and ensuring humanity’s multi-planetary future amongst the stars."

                Earth must be destroyed to save it?

                https://www.scribd.com/document/990116826/Orbital-Data-Center-LOA-Narrative
                2/n

                ...a pleasant rascalN This user is from outside of this forum
                ...a pleasant rascalN This user is from outside of this forum
                ...a pleasant rascal
                wrote last edited by
                #13

                @AkaSci We won't be able to explore outer space because we will be trapped with near-orbit satellite debris. No really. We'll be entombed in SpaceX floaties.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • AkaSci 🛰️A AkaSci 🛰️

                  To keep the clueless masses intoxicated, SpaceX threw in these flowery words in the FCC filing -

                  "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step towards becoming a Kardashev II-level civilization—one that can harness the Sun’s full power—while supporting AI-driven applications for billions of people today and ensuring humanity’s multi-planetary future amongst the stars."

                  Earth must be destroyed to save it?

                  https://www.scribd.com/document/990116826/Orbital-Data-Center-LOA-Narrative
                  2/n

                  Andy HT This user is from outside of this forum
                  Andy HT This user is from outside of this forum
                  Andy H
                  wrote last edited by
                  #14

                  @AkaSci and all ground-based astronomy can just fsck off, right? 😡

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • AkaSci 🛰️A AkaSci 🛰️

                    To keep the clueless masses intoxicated, SpaceX threw in these flowery words in the FCC filing -

                    "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step towards becoming a Kardashev II-level civilization—one that can harness the Sun’s full power—while supporting AI-driven applications for billions of people today and ensuring humanity’s multi-planetary future amongst the stars."

                    Earth must be destroyed to save it?

                    https://www.scribd.com/document/990116826/Orbital-Data-Center-LOA-Narrative
                    2/n

                    D This user is from outside of this forum
                    D This user is from outside of this forum
                    David
                    wrote last edited by
                    #15

                    @AkaSci Just in case anyone needs to see it: this can't work with today's or even near-future technology.

                    https://pivot-to-ai.com/2025/12/01/ai-data-centres-in-space-why-dcs-in-space-cant-work

                    #OrbitalAI #DataCentersInSpaceCantWork

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • AkaSci 🛰️A AkaSci 🛰️

                      New FCC filing by SpaceX for constellation of million data center satellites for AI apps.

                      # of sats: up to 1 million!
                      Orbit: 500 km and 2,000 km altitude and 30°inclinations. Multiple orbital shells 50 km apart.
                      Cooling: radiative
                      Schedule: unspecified
                      Sat size, weight, power, cost, ..: unspecified
                      Launches: millions of tons of mass per year

                      There goes the neighborhood.
                      Or is this just marketing fluff and orbital hoarding?

                      @sundogplanets
                      https://www.scribd.com/document/990116826/Orbital-Data-Center-LOA-Narrative
                      https://fccprod.servicenowservices.com/icfs?id=ibfs_application_summary&number=SAT-LOA-20260108-00016
                      1/n

                      ...a pleasant rascalN This user is from outside of this forum
                      ...a pleasant rascalN This user is from outside of this forum
                      ...a pleasant rascal
                      wrote last edited by
                      #16

                      @AkaSci @sundogplanets If any of you need talking points related to NOT building AI Data centers... straight from the horses mouth. Elon admits environmental impacts AND that AI is outpacing earth's ability to effectively build and manage them.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • R ActivityRelay shared this topic
                      • AkaSci 🛰️A AkaSci 🛰️

                        To keep the clueless masses intoxicated, SpaceX threw in these flowery words in the FCC filing -

                        "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step towards becoming a Kardashev II-level civilization—one that can harness the Sun’s full power—while supporting AI-driven applications for billions of people today and ensuring humanity’s multi-planetary future amongst the stars."

                        Earth must be destroyed to save it?

                        https://www.scribd.com/document/990116826/Orbital-Data-Center-LOA-Narrative
                        2/n

                        AkaSci 🛰️A This user is from outside of this forum
                        AkaSci 🛰️A This user is from outside of this forum
                        AkaSci 🛰️
                        wrote last edited by
                        #17

                        The filing is short on details and long on lofty goals and promises.

                        And also a bit sloppy -
                        "Global electricity demand for data centers is projected to more than double by 2035 driven by growth in AI — reaching ~1,200-1,700 Terawatt hours and ..."

                        You gotta specify TW or TW-hours per month or per year.

                        Also, I suspect the million satellite number comes from 1 million * 100 kw = 100 GW total power.

                        For comparison, Starlink v3 satellites will generate 20 kW with a 60x8 m array.

                        3/n

                        AkaSci 🛰️A 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • AkaSci 🛰️A AkaSci 🛰️

                          New FCC filing by SpaceX for constellation of million data center satellites for AI apps.

                          # of sats: up to 1 million!
                          Orbit: 500 km and 2,000 km altitude and 30°inclinations. Multiple orbital shells 50 km apart.
                          Cooling: radiative
                          Schedule: unspecified
                          Sat size, weight, power, cost, ..: unspecified
                          Launches: millions of tons of mass per year

                          There goes the neighborhood.
                          Or is this just marketing fluff and orbital hoarding?

                          @sundogplanets
                          https://www.scribd.com/document/990116826/Orbital-Data-Center-LOA-Narrative
                          https://fccprod.servicenowservices.com/icfs?id=ibfs_application_summary&number=SAT-LOA-20260108-00016
                          1/n

                          Mike TorrM This user is from outside of this forum
                          Mike TorrM This user is from outside of this forum
                          Mike Torr
                          wrote last edited by
                          #18

                          @AkaSci @sundogplanets OK, this has gone far enough. Does anyone actually have a way of shooting these fucking things down as they launch? Just asking.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Donald BallD Donald Ball

                            @AkaSci @sundogplanets Nothing about this makes any practical sense from a computer engineering perspective.

                            trainguyromT This user is from outside of this forum
                            trainguyromT This user is from outside of this forum
                            trainguyrom
                            wrote last edited by
                            #19

                            @donaldball @AkaSci @sundogplanets especially when we could simply lay more fiber trunks across the world (technology that already exists and is awesome) and achieve multiple magnitudes more bandwidth for more people at far greater speeds and consistencies! But that wouldn't further inflate Musk's wealth so we can't have that!

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • AkaSci 🛰️A AkaSci 🛰️

                              New FCC filing by SpaceX for constellation of million data center satellites for AI apps.

                              # of sats: up to 1 million!
                              Orbit: 500 km and 2,000 km altitude and 30°inclinations. Multiple orbital shells 50 km apart.
                              Cooling: radiative
                              Schedule: unspecified
                              Sat size, weight, power, cost, ..: unspecified
                              Launches: millions of tons of mass per year

                              There goes the neighborhood.
                              Or is this just marketing fluff and orbital hoarding?

                              @sundogplanets
                              https://www.scribd.com/document/990116826/Orbital-Data-Center-LOA-Narrative
                              https://fccprod.servicenowservices.com/icfs?id=ibfs_application_summary&number=SAT-LOA-20260108-00016
                              1/n

                              richR This user is from outside of this forum
                              richR This user is from outside of this forum
                              rich
                              wrote last edited by
                              #20

                              @AkaSci @sundogplanets we should start crowdfunding "Kessler Takedown Rockets"

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • AkaSci 🛰️A AkaSci 🛰️

                                The filing is short on details and long on lofty goals and promises.

                                And also a bit sloppy -
                                "Global electricity demand for data centers is projected to more than double by 2035 driven by growth in AI — reaching ~1,200-1,700 Terawatt hours and ..."

                                You gotta specify TW or TW-hours per month or per year.

                                Also, I suspect the million satellite number comes from 1 million * 100 kw = 100 GW total power.

                                For comparison, Starlink v3 satellites will generate 20 kW with a 60x8 m array.

                                3/n

                                AkaSci 🛰️A This user is from outside of this forum
                                AkaSci 🛰️A This user is from outside of this forum
                                AkaSci 🛰️
                                wrote last edited by
                                #21

                                A blunt assessment of "AI datacenters in space” by Prof. Matthew Buckley in Dec 2025 -

                                "To be blunt, the entire stupid idea is a giant middle finger to multiple fundamentals of physics, and the fact that it is apparently being taken seriously by our tech lords, mainstream journalism, and political leaders is a damning indictment of not just the ridiculous amount of money chasing bad ideas in the tech/LLM/hype sector that has eaten the American economy, ..."

                                https://www.physicsmatt.com/blog/2025/12/11/the-dumbest-thing-ive-seen-this-week
                                4/n

                                Wulfy—Speaker to the machinesN BenjaminHimesB F Amish CyborgA AkaSci 🛰️A 6 Replies Last reply
                                1
                                0
                                • AkaSci 🛰️A AkaSci 🛰️

                                  A blunt assessment of "AI datacenters in space” by Prof. Matthew Buckley in Dec 2025 -

                                  "To be blunt, the entire stupid idea is a giant middle finger to multiple fundamentals of physics, and the fact that it is apparently being taken seriously by our tech lords, mainstream journalism, and political leaders is a damning indictment of not just the ridiculous amount of money chasing bad ideas in the tech/LLM/hype sector that has eaten the American economy, ..."

                                  https://www.physicsmatt.com/blog/2025/12/11/the-dumbest-thing-ive-seen-this-week
                                  4/n

                                  Wulfy—Speaker to the machinesN This user is from outside of this forum
                                  Wulfy—Speaker to the machinesN This user is from outside of this forum
                                  Wulfy—Speaker to the machines
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #22

                                  @AkaSci

                                  Sooner or later, the unemployed, angry masses of #AiAntagonists will stop posting silly memes and start smashing #datacenters instead...

                                  ...from that perspective putting data centers in orbit is perfect protection against angry #luddite mobs...

                                  ...as a plus, cooling and power, which is the main thrust of Luddite critique (because #AI #LLM are totally useless) is taken care of in orbit...

                                  So if you have lift capacity of $20/kg suddenly orbital data centre starts to look like a damn good investment.

                                  Ray McCarthyR 2 Replies Last reply
                                  0
                                  • AkaSci 🛰️A AkaSci 🛰️

                                    New FCC filing by SpaceX for constellation of million data center satellites for AI apps.

                                    # of sats: up to 1 million!
                                    Orbit: 500 km and 2,000 km altitude and 30°inclinations. Multiple orbital shells 50 km apart.
                                    Cooling: radiative
                                    Schedule: unspecified
                                    Sat size, weight, power, cost, ..: unspecified
                                    Launches: millions of tons of mass per year

                                    There goes the neighborhood.
                                    Or is this just marketing fluff and orbital hoarding?

                                    @sundogplanets
                                    https://www.scribd.com/document/990116826/Orbital-Data-Center-LOA-Narrative
                                    https://fccprod.servicenowservices.com/icfs?id=ibfs_application_summary&number=SAT-LOA-20260108-00016
                                    1/n

                                    Cedar Fen Farm
Cedar Fen FarmO This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Cedar Fen Farm
Cedar Fen FarmO This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Cedar Fen Farm Cedar Fen Farm
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #23

                                    @AkaSci @sundogplanets

                                    Will they be armed with lazers?

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • AkaSci 🛰️A AkaSci 🛰️

                                      New FCC filing by SpaceX for constellation of million data center satellites for AI apps.

                                      # of sats: up to 1 million!
                                      Orbit: 500 km and 2,000 km altitude and 30°inclinations. Multiple orbital shells 50 km apart.
                                      Cooling: radiative
                                      Schedule: unspecified
                                      Sat size, weight, power, cost, ..: unspecified
                                      Launches: millions of tons of mass per year

                                      There goes the neighborhood.
                                      Or is this just marketing fluff and orbital hoarding?

                                      @sundogplanets
                                      https://www.scribd.com/document/990116826/Orbital-Data-Center-LOA-Narrative
                                      https://fccprod.servicenowservices.com/icfs?id=ibfs_application_summary&number=SAT-LOA-20260108-00016
                                      1/n

                                      Ray McCarthyR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Ray McCarthyR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Ray McCarthy
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #24

                                      @AkaSci @sundogplanets
                                      These are mild
                                      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kardashev_scale#Criticisms_of_the_classification

                                      Even Kardashev I is fantasy.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • Wulfy—Speaker to the machinesN Wulfy—Speaker to the machines

                                        @AkaSci

                                        Sooner or later, the unemployed, angry masses of #AiAntagonists will stop posting silly memes and start smashing #datacenters instead...

                                        ...from that perspective putting data centers in orbit is perfect protection against angry #luddite mobs...

                                        ...as a plus, cooling and power, which is the main thrust of Luddite critique (because #AI #LLM are totally useless) is taken care of in orbit...

                                        So if you have lift capacity of $20/kg suddenly orbital data centre starts to look like a damn good investment.

                                        Ray McCarthyR This user is from outside of this forum
                                        Ray McCarthyR This user is from outside of this forum
                                        Ray McCarthy
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #25

                                        @n_dimension @AkaSci
                                        Frank Herbert's imagined "Butlerian Jihad" in Dune is looking likely.

                                        Multiple levels of magical thinking!

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • Wulfy—Speaker to the machinesN Wulfy—Speaker to the machines

                                          @AkaSci

                                          Sooner or later, the unemployed, angry masses of #AiAntagonists will stop posting silly memes and start smashing #datacenters instead...

                                          ...from that perspective putting data centers in orbit is perfect protection against angry #luddite mobs...

                                          ...as a plus, cooling and power, which is the main thrust of Luddite critique (because #AI #LLM are totally useless) is taken care of in orbit...

                                          So if you have lift capacity of $20/kg suddenly orbital data centre starts to look like a damn good investment.

                                          Ray McCarthyR This user is from outside of this forum
                                          Ray McCarthyR This user is from outside of this forum
                                          Ray McCarthy
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #26

                                          @n_dimension @AkaSci
                                          Cooling stuff in space is actually really hard. No evaporation cycles, convection or conduction. Only IR radiation on the "dark" side.

                                          AkaSci 🛰️A 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups