Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. New FCC filing by SpaceX for constellation of million data center satellites for AI apps.

New FCC filing by SpaceX for constellation of million data center satellites for AI apps.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
37 Posts 25 Posters 77 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • AkaSci 🛰️A AkaSci 🛰️

    New FCC filing by SpaceX for constellation of million data center satellites for AI apps.

    # of sats: up to 1 million!
    Orbit: 500 km and 2,000 km altitude and 30°inclinations. Multiple orbital shells 50 km apart.
    Cooling: radiative
    Schedule: unspecified
    Sat size, weight, power, cost, ..: unspecified
    Launches: millions of tons of mass per year

    There goes the neighborhood.
    Or is this just marketing fluff and orbital hoarding?

    @sundogplanets
    https://www.scribd.com/document/990116826/Orbital-Data-Center-LOA-Narrative
    https://fccprod.servicenowservices.com/icfs?id=ibfs_application_summary&number=SAT-LOA-20260108-00016
    1/n

    Rob PumphreyR This user is from outside of this forum
    Rob PumphreyR This user is from outside of this forum
    Rob Pumphrey
    wrote last edited by
    #9

    @AkaSci @sundogplanets
    You have got to hope this is about as practical as a hyperloop.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • AkaSci 🛰️A AkaSci 🛰️

      @Kierkegaanks
      Kardashian ii perhaps?
      😜

      Kierkethumbs up convincinglyK This user is from outside of this forum
      Kierkethumbs up convincinglyK This user is from outside of this forum
      Kierkethumbs up convincingly
      wrote last edited by
      #10

      @AkaSci full kardashev 3 in 18-36 months

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • AkaSci 🛰️A AkaSci 🛰️

        To keep the clueless masses intoxicated, SpaceX threw in these flowery words in the FCC filing -

        "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step towards becoming a Kardashev II-level civilization—one that can harness the Sun’s full power—while supporting AI-driven applications for billions of people today and ensuring humanity’s multi-planetary future amongst the stars."

        Earth must be destroyed to save it?

        https://www.scribd.com/document/990116826/Orbital-Data-Center-LOA-Narrative
        2/n

        Judy SchmidtG This user is from outside of this forum
        Judy SchmidtG This user is from outside of this forum
        Judy Schmidt
        wrote last edited by
        #11

        @AkaSci his hubris is insufferable

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • AkaSci 🛰️A AkaSci 🛰️

          New FCC filing by SpaceX for constellation of million data center satellites for AI apps.

          # of sats: up to 1 million!
          Orbit: 500 km and 2,000 km altitude and 30°inclinations. Multiple orbital shells 50 km apart.
          Cooling: radiative
          Schedule: unspecified
          Sat size, weight, power, cost, ..: unspecified
          Launches: millions of tons of mass per year

          There goes the neighborhood.
          Or is this just marketing fluff and orbital hoarding?

          @sundogplanets
          https://www.scribd.com/document/990116826/Orbital-Data-Center-LOA-Narrative
          https://fccprod.servicenowservices.com/icfs?id=ibfs_application_summary&number=SAT-LOA-20260108-00016
          1/n

          Ray McCarthyR This user is from outside of this forum
          Ray McCarthyR This user is from outside of this forum
          Ray McCarthy
          wrote last edited by
          #12

          @AkaSci @sundogplanets
          BONKERS!

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • AkaSci 🛰️A AkaSci 🛰️

            To keep the clueless masses intoxicated, SpaceX threw in these flowery words in the FCC filing -

            "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step towards becoming a Kardashev II-level civilization—one that can harness the Sun’s full power—while supporting AI-driven applications for billions of people today and ensuring humanity’s multi-planetary future amongst the stars."

            Earth must be destroyed to save it?

            https://www.scribd.com/document/990116826/Orbital-Data-Center-LOA-Narrative
            2/n

            ...a pleasant rascalN This user is from outside of this forum
            ...a pleasant rascalN This user is from outside of this forum
            ...a pleasant rascal
            wrote last edited by
            #13

            @AkaSci We won't be able to explore outer space because we will be trapped with near-orbit satellite debris. No really. We'll be entombed in SpaceX floaties.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • AkaSci 🛰️A AkaSci 🛰️

              To keep the clueless masses intoxicated, SpaceX threw in these flowery words in the FCC filing -

              "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step towards becoming a Kardashev II-level civilization—one that can harness the Sun’s full power—while supporting AI-driven applications for billions of people today and ensuring humanity’s multi-planetary future amongst the stars."

              Earth must be destroyed to save it?

              https://www.scribd.com/document/990116826/Orbital-Data-Center-LOA-Narrative
              2/n

              Andy HT This user is from outside of this forum
              Andy HT This user is from outside of this forum
              Andy H
              wrote last edited by
              #14

              @AkaSci and all ground-based astronomy can just fsck off, right? 😡

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • AkaSci 🛰️A AkaSci 🛰️

                To keep the clueless masses intoxicated, SpaceX threw in these flowery words in the FCC filing -

                "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step towards becoming a Kardashev II-level civilization—one that can harness the Sun’s full power—while supporting AI-driven applications for billions of people today and ensuring humanity’s multi-planetary future amongst the stars."

                Earth must be destroyed to save it?

                https://www.scribd.com/document/990116826/Orbital-Data-Center-LOA-Narrative
                2/n

                D This user is from outside of this forum
                D This user is from outside of this forum
                David
                wrote last edited by
                #15

                @AkaSci Just in case anyone needs to see it: this can't work with today's or even near-future technology.

                https://pivot-to-ai.com/2025/12/01/ai-data-centres-in-space-why-dcs-in-space-cant-work

                #OrbitalAI #DataCentersInSpaceCantWork

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • AkaSci 🛰️A AkaSci 🛰️

                  New FCC filing by SpaceX for constellation of million data center satellites for AI apps.

                  # of sats: up to 1 million!
                  Orbit: 500 km and 2,000 km altitude and 30°inclinations. Multiple orbital shells 50 km apart.
                  Cooling: radiative
                  Schedule: unspecified
                  Sat size, weight, power, cost, ..: unspecified
                  Launches: millions of tons of mass per year

                  There goes the neighborhood.
                  Or is this just marketing fluff and orbital hoarding?

                  @sundogplanets
                  https://www.scribd.com/document/990116826/Orbital-Data-Center-LOA-Narrative
                  https://fccprod.servicenowservices.com/icfs?id=ibfs_application_summary&number=SAT-LOA-20260108-00016
                  1/n

                  ...a pleasant rascalN This user is from outside of this forum
                  ...a pleasant rascalN This user is from outside of this forum
                  ...a pleasant rascal
                  wrote last edited by
                  #16

                  @AkaSci @sundogplanets If any of you need talking points related to NOT building AI Data centers... straight from the horses mouth. Elon admits environmental impacts AND that AI is outpacing earth's ability to effectively build and manage them.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • R ActivityRelay shared this topic
                  • AkaSci 🛰️A AkaSci 🛰️

                    To keep the clueless masses intoxicated, SpaceX threw in these flowery words in the FCC filing -

                    "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step towards becoming a Kardashev II-level civilization—one that can harness the Sun’s full power—while supporting AI-driven applications for billions of people today and ensuring humanity’s multi-planetary future amongst the stars."

                    Earth must be destroyed to save it?

                    https://www.scribd.com/document/990116826/Orbital-Data-Center-LOA-Narrative
                    2/n

                    AkaSci 🛰️A This user is from outside of this forum
                    AkaSci 🛰️A This user is from outside of this forum
                    AkaSci 🛰️
                    wrote last edited by
                    #17

                    The filing is short on details and long on lofty goals and promises.

                    And also a bit sloppy -
                    "Global electricity demand for data centers is projected to more than double by 2035 driven by growth in AI — reaching ~1,200-1,700 Terawatt hours and ..."

                    You gotta specify TW or TW-hours per month or per year.

                    Also, I suspect the million satellite number comes from 1 million * 100 kw = 100 GW total power.

                    For comparison, Starlink v3 satellites will generate 20 kW with a 60x8 m array.

                    3/n

                    AkaSci 🛰️A 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • AkaSci 🛰️A AkaSci 🛰️

                      New FCC filing by SpaceX for constellation of million data center satellites for AI apps.

                      # of sats: up to 1 million!
                      Orbit: 500 km and 2,000 km altitude and 30°inclinations. Multiple orbital shells 50 km apart.
                      Cooling: radiative
                      Schedule: unspecified
                      Sat size, weight, power, cost, ..: unspecified
                      Launches: millions of tons of mass per year

                      There goes the neighborhood.
                      Or is this just marketing fluff and orbital hoarding?

                      @sundogplanets
                      https://www.scribd.com/document/990116826/Orbital-Data-Center-LOA-Narrative
                      https://fccprod.servicenowservices.com/icfs?id=ibfs_application_summary&number=SAT-LOA-20260108-00016
                      1/n

                      Mike TorrM This user is from outside of this forum
                      Mike TorrM This user is from outside of this forum
                      Mike Torr
                      wrote last edited by
                      #18

                      @AkaSci @sundogplanets OK, this has gone far enough. Does anyone actually have a way of shooting these fucking things down as they launch? Just asking.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Donald BallD Donald Ball

                        @AkaSci @sundogplanets Nothing about this makes any practical sense from a computer engineering perspective.

                        trainguyromT This user is from outside of this forum
                        trainguyromT This user is from outside of this forum
                        trainguyrom
                        wrote last edited by
                        #19

                        @donaldball @AkaSci @sundogplanets especially when we could simply lay more fiber trunks across the world (technology that already exists and is awesome) and achieve multiple magnitudes more bandwidth for more people at far greater speeds and consistencies! But that wouldn't further inflate Musk's wealth so we can't have that!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • AkaSci 🛰️A AkaSci 🛰️

                          New FCC filing by SpaceX for constellation of million data center satellites for AI apps.

                          # of sats: up to 1 million!
                          Orbit: 500 km and 2,000 km altitude and 30°inclinations. Multiple orbital shells 50 km apart.
                          Cooling: radiative
                          Schedule: unspecified
                          Sat size, weight, power, cost, ..: unspecified
                          Launches: millions of tons of mass per year

                          There goes the neighborhood.
                          Or is this just marketing fluff and orbital hoarding?

                          @sundogplanets
                          https://www.scribd.com/document/990116826/Orbital-Data-Center-LOA-Narrative
                          https://fccprod.servicenowservices.com/icfs?id=ibfs_application_summary&number=SAT-LOA-20260108-00016
                          1/n

                          richR This user is from outside of this forum
                          richR This user is from outside of this forum
                          rich
                          wrote last edited by
                          #20

                          @AkaSci @sundogplanets we should start crowdfunding "Kessler Takedown Rockets"

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • AkaSci 🛰️A AkaSci 🛰️

                            The filing is short on details and long on lofty goals and promises.

                            And also a bit sloppy -
                            "Global electricity demand for data centers is projected to more than double by 2035 driven by growth in AI — reaching ~1,200-1,700 Terawatt hours and ..."

                            You gotta specify TW or TW-hours per month or per year.

                            Also, I suspect the million satellite number comes from 1 million * 100 kw = 100 GW total power.

                            For comparison, Starlink v3 satellites will generate 20 kW with a 60x8 m array.

                            3/n

                            AkaSci 🛰️A This user is from outside of this forum
                            AkaSci 🛰️A This user is from outside of this forum
                            AkaSci 🛰️
                            wrote last edited by
                            #21

                            A blunt assessment of "AI datacenters in space” by Prof. Matthew Buckley in Dec 2025 -

                            "To be blunt, the entire stupid idea is a giant middle finger to multiple fundamentals of physics, and the fact that it is apparently being taken seriously by our tech lords, mainstream journalism, and political leaders is a damning indictment of not just the ridiculous amount of money chasing bad ideas in the tech/LLM/hype sector that has eaten the American economy, ..."

                            https://www.physicsmatt.com/blog/2025/12/11/the-dumbest-thing-ive-seen-this-week
                            4/n

                            Wulfy—Speaker to the machinesN BenjaminHimesB F Amish CyborgA AkaSci 🛰️A 6 Replies Last reply
                            1
                            0
                            • AkaSci 🛰️A AkaSci 🛰️

                              A blunt assessment of "AI datacenters in space” by Prof. Matthew Buckley in Dec 2025 -

                              "To be blunt, the entire stupid idea is a giant middle finger to multiple fundamentals of physics, and the fact that it is apparently being taken seriously by our tech lords, mainstream journalism, and political leaders is a damning indictment of not just the ridiculous amount of money chasing bad ideas in the tech/LLM/hype sector that has eaten the American economy, ..."

                              https://www.physicsmatt.com/blog/2025/12/11/the-dumbest-thing-ive-seen-this-week
                              4/n

                              Wulfy—Speaker to the machinesN This user is from outside of this forum
                              Wulfy—Speaker to the machinesN This user is from outside of this forum
                              Wulfy—Speaker to the machines
                              wrote last edited by
                              #22

                              @AkaSci

                              Sooner or later, the unemployed, angry masses of #AiAntagonists will stop posting silly memes and start smashing #datacenters instead...

                              ...from that perspective putting data centers in orbit is perfect protection against angry #luddite mobs...

                              ...as a plus, cooling and power, which is the main thrust of Luddite critique (because #AI #LLM are totally useless) is taken care of in orbit...

                              So if you have lift capacity of $20/kg suddenly orbital data centre starts to look like a damn good investment.

                              Ray McCarthyR 2 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • AkaSci 🛰️A AkaSci 🛰️

                                New FCC filing by SpaceX for constellation of million data center satellites for AI apps.

                                # of sats: up to 1 million!
                                Orbit: 500 km and 2,000 km altitude and 30°inclinations. Multiple orbital shells 50 km apart.
                                Cooling: radiative
                                Schedule: unspecified
                                Sat size, weight, power, cost, ..: unspecified
                                Launches: millions of tons of mass per year

                                There goes the neighborhood.
                                Or is this just marketing fluff and orbital hoarding?

                                @sundogplanets
                                https://www.scribd.com/document/990116826/Orbital-Data-Center-LOA-Narrative
                                https://fccprod.servicenowservices.com/icfs?id=ibfs_application_summary&number=SAT-LOA-20260108-00016
                                1/n

                                Cedar Fen Farm
Cedar Fen FarmO This user is from outside of this forum
                                Cedar Fen Farm
Cedar Fen FarmO This user is from outside of this forum
                                Cedar Fen Farm Cedar Fen Farm
                                wrote last edited by
                                #23

                                @AkaSci @sundogplanets

                                Will they be armed with lazers?

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • AkaSci 🛰️A AkaSci 🛰️

                                  New FCC filing by SpaceX for constellation of million data center satellites for AI apps.

                                  # of sats: up to 1 million!
                                  Orbit: 500 km and 2,000 km altitude and 30°inclinations. Multiple orbital shells 50 km apart.
                                  Cooling: radiative
                                  Schedule: unspecified
                                  Sat size, weight, power, cost, ..: unspecified
                                  Launches: millions of tons of mass per year

                                  There goes the neighborhood.
                                  Or is this just marketing fluff and orbital hoarding?

                                  @sundogplanets
                                  https://www.scribd.com/document/990116826/Orbital-Data-Center-LOA-Narrative
                                  https://fccprod.servicenowservices.com/icfs?id=ibfs_application_summary&number=SAT-LOA-20260108-00016
                                  1/n

                                  Ray McCarthyR This user is from outside of this forum
                                  Ray McCarthyR This user is from outside of this forum
                                  Ray McCarthy
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #24

                                  @AkaSci @sundogplanets
                                  These are mild
                                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kardashev_scale#Criticisms_of_the_classification

                                  Even Kardashev I is fantasy.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • Wulfy—Speaker to the machinesN Wulfy—Speaker to the machines

                                    @AkaSci

                                    Sooner or later, the unemployed, angry masses of #AiAntagonists will stop posting silly memes and start smashing #datacenters instead...

                                    ...from that perspective putting data centers in orbit is perfect protection against angry #luddite mobs...

                                    ...as a plus, cooling and power, which is the main thrust of Luddite critique (because #AI #LLM are totally useless) is taken care of in orbit...

                                    So if you have lift capacity of $20/kg suddenly orbital data centre starts to look like a damn good investment.

                                    Ray McCarthyR This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Ray McCarthyR This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Ray McCarthy
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #25

                                    @n_dimension @AkaSci
                                    Frank Herbert's imagined "Butlerian Jihad" in Dune is looking likely.

                                    Multiple levels of magical thinking!

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • Wulfy—Speaker to the machinesN Wulfy—Speaker to the machines

                                      @AkaSci

                                      Sooner or later, the unemployed, angry masses of #AiAntagonists will stop posting silly memes and start smashing #datacenters instead...

                                      ...from that perspective putting data centers in orbit is perfect protection against angry #luddite mobs...

                                      ...as a plus, cooling and power, which is the main thrust of Luddite critique (because #AI #LLM are totally useless) is taken care of in orbit...

                                      So if you have lift capacity of $20/kg suddenly orbital data centre starts to look like a damn good investment.

                                      Ray McCarthyR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Ray McCarthyR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Ray McCarthy
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #26

                                      @n_dimension @AkaSci
                                      Cooling stuff in space is actually really hard. No evaporation cycles, convection or conduction. Only IR radiation on the "dark" side.

                                      AkaSci 🛰️A 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • Ray McCarthyR Ray McCarthy

                                        @n_dimension @AkaSci
                                        Cooling stuff in space is actually really hard. No evaporation cycles, convection or conduction. Only IR radiation on the "dark" side.

                                        AkaSci 🛰️A This user is from outside of this forum
                                        AkaSci 🛰️A This user is from outside of this forum
                                        AkaSci 🛰️
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #27

                                        @raymaccarthy @n_dimension
                                        Not a problem. AI will solve it 😜

                                        Ray McCarthyR 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • AkaSci 🛰️A AkaSci 🛰️

                                          @raymaccarthy @n_dimension
                                          Not a problem. AI will solve it 😜

                                          Ray McCarthyR This user is from outside of this forum
                                          Ray McCarthyR This user is from outside of this forum
                                          Ray McCarthy
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #28

                                          @AkaSci @n_dimension
                                          You need to adjust your clothing!

                                          That's fierce sarcasm that's exposed!

                                          AI might, but we have no idea how to make an AI. The LLM/Generative "AI" are statistical plagiarism machines. More useful mis-named Machine learning is simply curated databases and pattern matching, with rules created by experts.

                                          Scrape the Internet and you end up with regurgitated "Grokipedia", a NAZIfied version of Wikipedia, and a bunch on random nonsense.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups