Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. New FCC filing by SpaceX for constellation of million data center satellites for AI apps.

New FCC filing by SpaceX for constellation of million data center satellites for AI apps.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
37 Posts 25 Posters 77 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Donald BallD Donald Ball

    @AkaSci @sundogplanets Nothing about this makes any practical sense from a computer engineering perspective.

    trainguyromT This user is from outside of this forum
    trainguyromT This user is from outside of this forum
    trainguyrom
    wrote last edited by
    #19

    @donaldball @AkaSci @sundogplanets especially when we could simply lay more fiber trunks across the world (technology that already exists and is awesome) and achieve multiple magnitudes more bandwidth for more people at far greater speeds and consistencies! But that wouldn't further inflate Musk's wealth so we can't have that!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • AkaSci 🛰️A AkaSci 🛰️

      New FCC filing by SpaceX for constellation of million data center satellites for AI apps.

      # of sats: up to 1 million!
      Orbit: 500 km and 2,000 km altitude and 30°inclinations. Multiple orbital shells 50 km apart.
      Cooling: radiative
      Schedule: unspecified
      Sat size, weight, power, cost, ..: unspecified
      Launches: millions of tons of mass per year

      There goes the neighborhood.
      Or is this just marketing fluff and orbital hoarding?

      @sundogplanets
      https://www.scribd.com/document/990116826/Orbital-Data-Center-LOA-Narrative
      https://fccprod.servicenowservices.com/icfs?id=ibfs_application_summary&number=SAT-LOA-20260108-00016
      1/n

      richR This user is from outside of this forum
      richR This user is from outside of this forum
      rich
      wrote last edited by
      #20

      @AkaSci @sundogplanets we should start crowdfunding "Kessler Takedown Rockets"

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • AkaSci 🛰️A AkaSci 🛰️

        The filing is short on details and long on lofty goals and promises.

        And also a bit sloppy -
        "Global electricity demand for data centers is projected to more than double by 2035 driven by growth in AI — reaching ~1,200-1,700 Terawatt hours and ..."

        You gotta specify TW or TW-hours per month or per year.

        Also, I suspect the million satellite number comes from 1 million * 100 kw = 100 GW total power.

        For comparison, Starlink v3 satellites will generate 20 kW with a 60x8 m array.

        3/n

        AkaSci 🛰️A This user is from outside of this forum
        AkaSci 🛰️A This user is from outside of this forum
        AkaSci 🛰️
        wrote last edited by
        #21

        A blunt assessment of "AI datacenters in space” by Prof. Matthew Buckley in Dec 2025 -

        "To be blunt, the entire stupid idea is a giant middle finger to multiple fundamentals of physics, and the fact that it is apparently being taken seriously by our tech lords, mainstream journalism, and political leaders is a damning indictment of not just the ridiculous amount of money chasing bad ideas in the tech/LLM/hype sector that has eaten the American economy, ..."

        https://www.physicsmatt.com/blog/2025/12/11/the-dumbest-thing-ive-seen-this-week
        4/n

        Wulfy—Speaker to the machinesN BenjaminHimesB F Amish CyborgA AkaSci 🛰️A 6 Replies Last reply
        1
        0
        • AkaSci 🛰️A AkaSci 🛰️

          A blunt assessment of "AI datacenters in space” by Prof. Matthew Buckley in Dec 2025 -

          "To be blunt, the entire stupid idea is a giant middle finger to multiple fundamentals of physics, and the fact that it is apparently being taken seriously by our tech lords, mainstream journalism, and political leaders is a damning indictment of not just the ridiculous amount of money chasing bad ideas in the tech/LLM/hype sector that has eaten the American economy, ..."

          https://www.physicsmatt.com/blog/2025/12/11/the-dumbest-thing-ive-seen-this-week
          4/n

          Wulfy—Speaker to the machinesN This user is from outside of this forum
          Wulfy—Speaker to the machinesN This user is from outside of this forum
          Wulfy—Speaker to the machines
          wrote last edited by
          #22

          @AkaSci

          Sooner or later, the unemployed, angry masses of #AiAntagonists will stop posting silly memes and start smashing #datacenters instead...

          ...from that perspective putting data centers in orbit is perfect protection against angry #luddite mobs...

          ...as a plus, cooling and power, which is the main thrust of Luddite critique (because #AI #LLM are totally useless) is taken care of in orbit...

          So if you have lift capacity of $20/kg suddenly orbital data centre starts to look like a damn good investment.

          Ray McCarthyR 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • AkaSci 🛰️A AkaSci 🛰️

            New FCC filing by SpaceX for constellation of million data center satellites for AI apps.

            # of sats: up to 1 million!
            Orbit: 500 km and 2,000 km altitude and 30°inclinations. Multiple orbital shells 50 km apart.
            Cooling: radiative
            Schedule: unspecified
            Sat size, weight, power, cost, ..: unspecified
            Launches: millions of tons of mass per year

            There goes the neighborhood.
            Or is this just marketing fluff and orbital hoarding?

            @sundogplanets
            https://www.scribd.com/document/990116826/Orbital-Data-Center-LOA-Narrative
            https://fccprod.servicenowservices.com/icfs?id=ibfs_application_summary&number=SAT-LOA-20260108-00016
            1/n

            Cedar Fen Farm
Cedar Fen FarmO This user is from outside of this forum
            Cedar Fen Farm
Cedar Fen FarmO This user is from outside of this forum
            Cedar Fen Farm Cedar Fen Farm
            wrote last edited by
            #23

            @AkaSci @sundogplanets

            Will they be armed with lazers?

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • AkaSci 🛰️A AkaSci 🛰️

              New FCC filing by SpaceX for constellation of million data center satellites for AI apps.

              # of sats: up to 1 million!
              Orbit: 500 km and 2,000 km altitude and 30°inclinations. Multiple orbital shells 50 km apart.
              Cooling: radiative
              Schedule: unspecified
              Sat size, weight, power, cost, ..: unspecified
              Launches: millions of tons of mass per year

              There goes the neighborhood.
              Or is this just marketing fluff and orbital hoarding?

              @sundogplanets
              https://www.scribd.com/document/990116826/Orbital-Data-Center-LOA-Narrative
              https://fccprod.servicenowservices.com/icfs?id=ibfs_application_summary&number=SAT-LOA-20260108-00016
              1/n

              Ray McCarthyR This user is from outside of this forum
              Ray McCarthyR This user is from outside of this forum
              Ray McCarthy
              wrote last edited by
              #24

              @AkaSci @sundogplanets
              These are mild
              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kardashev_scale#Criticisms_of_the_classification

              Even Kardashev I is fantasy.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Wulfy—Speaker to the machinesN Wulfy—Speaker to the machines

                @AkaSci

                Sooner or later, the unemployed, angry masses of #AiAntagonists will stop posting silly memes and start smashing #datacenters instead...

                ...from that perspective putting data centers in orbit is perfect protection against angry #luddite mobs...

                ...as a plus, cooling and power, which is the main thrust of Luddite critique (because #AI #LLM are totally useless) is taken care of in orbit...

                So if you have lift capacity of $20/kg suddenly orbital data centre starts to look like a damn good investment.

                Ray McCarthyR This user is from outside of this forum
                Ray McCarthyR This user is from outside of this forum
                Ray McCarthy
                wrote last edited by
                #25

                @n_dimension @AkaSci
                Frank Herbert's imagined "Butlerian Jihad" in Dune is looking likely.

                Multiple levels of magical thinking!

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Wulfy—Speaker to the machinesN Wulfy—Speaker to the machines

                  @AkaSci

                  Sooner or later, the unemployed, angry masses of #AiAntagonists will stop posting silly memes and start smashing #datacenters instead...

                  ...from that perspective putting data centers in orbit is perfect protection against angry #luddite mobs...

                  ...as a plus, cooling and power, which is the main thrust of Luddite critique (because #AI #LLM are totally useless) is taken care of in orbit...

                  So if you have lift capacity of $20/kg suddenly orbital data centre starts to look like a damn good investment.

                  Ray McCarthyR This user is from outside of this forum
                  Ray McCarthyR This user is from outside of this forum
                  Ray McCarthy
                  wrote last edited by
                  #26

                  @n_dimension @AkaSci
                  Cooling stuff in space is actually really hard. No evaporation cycles, convection or conduction. Only IR radiation on the "dark" side.

                  AkaSci 🛰️A 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Ray McCarthyR Ray McCarthy

                    @n_dimension @AkaSci
                    Cooling stuff in space is actually really hard. No evaporation cycles, convection or conduction. Only IR radiation on the "dark" side.

                    AkaSci 🛰️A This user is from outside of this forum
                    AkaSci 🛰️A This user is from outside of this forum
                    AkaSci 🛰️
                    wrote last edited by
                    #27

                    @raymaccarthy @n_dimension
                    Not a problem. AI will solve it 😜

                    Ray McCarthyR 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • AkaSci 🛰️A AkaSci 🛰️

                      @raymaccarthy @n_dimension
                      Not a problem. AI will solve it 😜

                      Ray McCarthyR This user is from outside of this forum
                      Ray McCarthyR This user is from outside of this forum
                      Ray McCarthy
                      wrote last edited by
                      #28

                      @AkaSci @n_dimension
                      You need to adjust your clothing!

                      That's fierce sarcasm that's exposed!

                      AI might, but we have no idea how to make an AI. The LLM/Generative "AI" are statistical plagiarism machines. More useful mis-named Machine learning is simply curated databases and pattern matching, with rules created by experts.

                      Scrape the Internet and you end up with regurgitated "Grokipedia", a NAZIfied version of Wikipedia, and a bunch on random nonsense.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • AkaSci 🛰️A AkaSci 🛰️

                        New FCC filing by SpaceX for constellation of million data center satellites for AI apps.

                        # of sats: up to 1 million!
                        Orbit: 500 km and 2,000 km altitude and 30°inclinations. Multiple orbital shells 50 km apart.
                        Cooling: radiative
                        Schedule: unspecified
                        Sat size, weight, power, cost, ..: unspecified
                        Launches: millions of tons of mass per year

                        There goes the neighborhood.
                        Or is this just marketing fluff and orbital hoarding?

                        @sundogplanets
                        https://www.scribd.com/document/990116826/Orbital-Data-Center-LOA-Narrative
                        https://fccprod.servicenowservices.com/icfs?id=ibfs_application_summary&number=SAT-LOA-20260108-00016
                        1/n

                        Sassinake! - ⊃∪∩⪽S This user is from outside of this forum
                        Sassinake! - ⊃∪∩⪽S This user is from outside of this forum
                        Sassinake! - ⊃∪∩⪽
                        wrote last edited by
                        #29

                        @AkaSci @sundogplanets

                        What happens if the command to 'hurtle towards the earth in a fiery rain' is pushed to the network?

                        Does Musk become a God in fact?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • AkaSci 🛰️A AkaSci 🛰️

                          New FCC filing by SpaceX for constellation of million data center satellites for AI apps.

                          # of sats: up to 1 million!
                          Orbit: 500 km and 2,000 km altitude and 30°inclinations. Multiple orbital shells 50 km apart.
                          Cooling: radiative
                          Schedule: unspecified
                          Sat size, weight, power, cost, ..: unspecified
                          Launches: millions of tons of mass per year

                          There goes the neighborhood.
                          Or is this just marketing fluff and orbital hoarding?

                          @sundogplanets
                          https://www.scribd.com/document/990116826/Orbital-Data-Center-LOA-Narrative
                          https://fccprod.servicenowservices.com/icfs?id=ibfs_application_summary&number=SAT-LOA-20260108-00016
                          1/n

                          MiraM This user is from outside of this forum
                          MiraM This user is from outside of this forum
                          Mira
                          wrote last edited by
                          #30

                          @AkaSci @sundogplanets At this point in human history, having the Kessler Syndrome occur just might not be the worst thing

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • AkaSci 🛰️A AkaSci 🛰️

                            A blunt assessment of "AI datacenters in space” by Prof. Matthew Buckley in Dec 2025 -

                            "To be blunt, the entire stupid idea is a giant middle finger to multiple fundamentals of physics, and the fact that it is apparently being taken seriously by our tech lords, mainstream journalism, and political leaders is a damning indictment of not just the ridiculous amount of money chasing bad ideas in the tech/LLM/hype sector that has eaten the American economy, ..."

                            https://www.physicsmatt.com/blog/2025/12/11/the-dumbest-thing-ive-seen-this-week
                            4/n

                            BenjaminHimesB This user is from outside of this forum
                            BenjaminHimesB This user is from outside of this forum
                            BenjaminHimes
                            wrote last edited by
                            #31

                            @AkaSci but hey, think of all that random bit flipping you’d get from the cosmic radiation. A whole new flavor of stochastic gradient descent! lol

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • AkaSci 🛰️A AkaSci 🛰️

                              New FCC filing by SpaceX for constellation of million data center satellites for AI apps.

                              # of sats: up to 1 million!
                              Orbit: 500 km and 2,000 km altitude and 30°inclinations. Multiple orbital shells 50 km apart.
                              Cooling: radiative
                              Schedule: unspecified
                              Sat size, weight, power, cost, ..: unspecified
                              Launches: millions of tons of mass per year

                              There goes the neighborhood.
                              Or is this just marketing fluff and orbital hoarding?

                              @sundogplanets
                              https://www.scribd.com/document/990116826/Orbital-Data-Center-LOA-Narrative
                              https://fccprod.servicenowservices.com/icfs?id=ibfs_application_summary&number=SAT-LOA-20260108-00016
                              1/n

                              Joseph LordJ This user is from outside of this forum
                              Joseph LordJ This user is from outside of this forum
                              Joseph Lord
                              wrote last edited by
                              #32

                              @AkaSci @sundogplanets One of the dumbest things I ever heard. How do you cool a data centre in a vacuum? Somehow get the heat to the outside and try to radiate it? Must be possible to workout the maths for radiating heat. I wonder how long it would take to earn back the energy taken to get it into space in the first place.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • AkaSci 🛰️A AkaSci 🛰️

                                A blunt assessment of "AI datacenters in space” by Prof. Matthew Buckley in Dec 2025 -

                                "To be blunt, the entire stupid idea is a giant middle finger to multiple fundamentals of physics, and the fact that it is apparently being taken seriously by our tech lords, mainstream journalism, and political leaders is a damning indictment of not just the ridiculous amount of money chasing bad ideas in the tech/LLM/hype sector that has eaten the American economy, ..."

                                https://www.physicsmatt.com/blog/2025/12/11/the-dumbest-thing-ive-seen-this-week
                                4/n

                                F This user is from outside of this forum
                                F This user is from outside of this forum
                                flng
                                wrote last edited by
                                #33

                                @AkaSci how will they launch the sysops?

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • AkaSci 🛰️A AkaSci 🛰️

                                  New FCC filing by SpaceX for constellation of million data center satellites for AI apps.

                                  # of sats: up to 1 million!
                                  Orbit: 500 km and 2,000 km altitude and 30°inclinations. Multiple orbital shells 50 km apart.
                                  Cooling: radiative
                                  Schedule: unspecified
                                  Sat size, weight, power, cost, ..: unspecified
                                  Launches: millions of tons of mass per year

                                  There goes the neighborhood.
                                  Or is this just marketing fluff and orbital hoarding?

                                  @sundogplanets
                                  https://www.scribd.com/document/990116826/Orbital-Data-Center-LOA-Narrative
                                  https://fccprod.servicenowservices.com/icfs?id=ibfs_application_summary&number=SAT-LOA-20260108-00016
                                  1/n

                                  Kingsley Bugarin PLY OAM 🇦🇺K This user is from outside of this forum
                                  Kingsley Bugarin PLY OAM 🇦🇺K This user is from outside of this forum
                                  Kingsley Bugarin PLY OAM 🇦🇺
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #34

                                  @AkaSci

                                  Let's ignore the reality that orbital data centres are bullshit for hundreds of reasons and assume ketamine boy can pull it off.

                                  This site lists the sizes and masses of starlink satellites. I'm going to use the V2 full size specs. 40m^2 fully deployed and 1,250kg.

                                  https://dishycentral.com/how-big-are-starlink-satellites

                                  The orbital decay times for unboosted satellites with those specs at different altitudes are;

                                  500km - 5.68 years
                                  600km - 47.02 years
                                  700km - 303.73 years
                                  800km - 1,536.21 years
                                  900km - 6,112.47 years
                                  1,000km - 19,255.79 years

                                  Orbital decay calculator here;

                                  https://www.lizard-tail.com/isana/lab/orbital_decay/

                                  Data centres at higher altitudes better be built to last because they are not coming back down any time soon.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • AkaSci 🛰️A AkaSci 🛰️

                                    A blunt assessment of "AI datacenters in space” by Prof. Matthew Buckley in Dec 2025 -

                                    "To be blunt, the entire stupid idea is a giant middle finger to multiple fundamentals of physics, and the fact that it is apparently being taken seriously by our tech lords, mainstream journalism, and political leaders is a damning indictment of not just the ridiculous amount of money chasing bad ideas in the tech/LLM/hype sector that has eaten the American economy, ..."

                                    https://www.physicsmatt.com/blog/2025/12/11/the-dumbest-thing-ive-seen-this-week
                                    4/n

                                    Amish CyborgA This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Amish CyborgA This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Amish Cyborg
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #35

                                    @AkaSci well, there's this simple solution, although unpopular because ICE exists: arrest that south african illegal immigrant and NEVER let him go. Problem solved.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • AkaSci 🛰️A AkaSci 🛰️

                                      A blunt assessment of "AI datacenters in space” by Prof. Matthew Buckley in Dec 2025 -

                                      "To be blunt, the entire stupid idea is a giant middle finger to multiple fundamentals of physics, and the fact that it is apparently being taken seriously by our tech lords, mainstream journalism, and political leaders is a damning indictment of not just the ridiculous amount of money chasing bad ideas in the tech/LLM/hype sector that has eaten the American economy, ..."

                                      https://www.physicsmatt.com/blog/2025/12/11/the-dumbest-thing-ive-seen-this-week
                                      4/n

                                      AkaSci 🛰️A This user is from outside of this forum
                                      AkaSci 🛰️A This user is from outside of this forum
                                      AkaSci 🛰️
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #36

                                      Another good article by a former NASA engineer/scientist on why "Datacenters in space are a terrible, horrible, no good idea."

                                      "This is an absolutely terrible idea, and really makes zero sense whatsoever. There are multiple reasons for this, but they all amount to saying that the kind of electronics needed to make a datacenter work, particularly a datacenter deploying AI capacity in the form of GPUs and TPUs, is exactly the opposite of what works in space."

                                      https://taranis.ie/datacenters-in-space-are-a-terrible-horrible-no-good-idea/
                                      5/n

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • AkaSci 🛰️A AkaSci 🛰️

                                        A blunt assessment of "AI datacenters in space” by Prof. Matthew Buckley in Dec 2025 -

                                        "To be blunt, the entire stupid idea is a giant middle finger to multiple fundamentals of physics, and the fact that it is apparently being taken seriously by our tech lords, mainstream journalism, and political leaders is a damning indictment of not just the ridiculous amount of money chasing bad ideas in the tech/LLM/hype sector that has eaten the American economy, ..."

                                        https://www.physicsmatt.com/blog/2025/12/11/the-dumbest-thing-ive-seen-this-week
                                        4/n

                                        La Kwaaaaa BoyD This user is from outside of this forum
                                        La Kwaaaaa BoyD This user is from outside of this forum
                                        La Kwaaaaa Boy
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #37

                                        @AkaSci As much as I think the current Data Center Boom (TM) is a massive bubble that will end badly with a LOT of bag holders, if we really really needed *that much* compute we have plenty of cold surface area that just needs "bring heavy things and folks in and out" infrastructure.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        Reply
                                        • Reply as topic
                                        Log in to reply
                                        • Oldest to Newest
                                        • Newest to Oldest
                                        • Most Votes


                                        • Login

                                        • Don't have an account? Register

                                        • Login or register to search.
                                        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                        • First post
                                          Last post
                                        0
                                        • Categories
                                        • Recent
                                        • Tags
                                        • Popular
                                        • World
                                        • Users
                                        • Groups