Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Armin was once one of the most prolific programmers in Python.

Armin was once one of the most prolific programmers in Python.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
66 Posts 45 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

    @cwebber

    I have my fifth graders write a program that will convert decimal numbers to Roman numerals. They know that there are already webpages that do this with smart trim programs that always give the right answer. They know they could ask an LLM and probably get the right answers most of the time.

    They still want to solve the puzzle.

    "It works! It works!"

    I've love hearing that when I'm teaching.

    Lien RagL This user is from outside of this forum
    Lien RagL This user is from outside of this forum
    Lien Rag
    wrote last edited by
    #49

    @futurebird
    Yeah, "it works !" in an enthusiastic voice is music to the ears.
    It's when it becomes "it's alive !" that you need to start worrying.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Kye FoxK Kye Fox

      @wordshaper @cwebber What I will say is that continuing to maintain and develop the underlying skills is still important. People who let their writing, coding, whatever skills atrophy are likely doing themselves a disservice.

      edit: It varies by thing. For example: I never wanted to be good at computer, I wanted to play Wing Commander. I'm happy to let the LLM make little one-off scripts and tools now. I offload a lot for longform nonfiction, but I run the show 90% with music and fiction writing.

      It makes sense to me, then, that someone who never cared as much about code as what they could do with it is happy to offload coding to devote more brain power to the part that's fun for them.

      Kye FoxK This user is from outside of this forum
      Kye FoxK This user is from outside of this forum
      Kye Fox
      wrote last edited by
      #50

      @wordshaper @cwebber You know how people always yell "this thread should be a blog post!"

      Well, that's the thing: I...don't want to. I find it easier to write in short posts. I could, however, toss it in Opus to make a draft and fix it up as a proper blog post. But right now people are too het up about AI to accept that, so I'm not about to spend tokens or time on it even if it would be an unalloyed positive.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Christine Lemmer-WebberC Christine Lemmer-Webber

        Steve Klabnik also had an interview on lobste.rs. There's a lot in it! It's a cool read! https://alexalejandre.com/programming/steve-klabnik-interview/

        And then it gets to the AI part and he's just like "oh I don't write code anymore".

        And notably Steve Klabnik has a lot to say about code, but it's *all in the past*.

        Lots of brilliant people are becoming non-practitioners.

        Chris PittsT This user is from outside of this forum
        Chris PittsT This user is from outside of this forum
        Chris Pitts
        wrote last edited by
        #51

        @cwebber “Lots of brilliant people are becoming non-practitioners” is a statement that is going to stay with me for a long time.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Steve HerseyN Steve Hersey

          @cwebber
          My HR guy thinks I'm a fool for criticizing the new "vibe coding bootcamp," and that this is the new reality that he needs to train folks for.
          Nope nope nopetty nope.

          Kye FoxK This user is from outside of this forum
          Kye FoxK This user is from outside of this forum
          Kye Fox
          wrote last edited by
          #52

          @n1xnx @cwebber Didn't bootcamps turn into a model "when the measure becomes the target" problem?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

            @cwebber

            It took me a long time to find a programing puzzle at the right level for 5th grade. Many things that might seem simple are too complex.

            Making the Roman numeral converter they learn about indexes and lists, place value, and modular division.

            It's really math, and logic. Working out how to present the question made *me* smarter since I had to think about the problem in a new way that avoided aspects of coding that were ... technical without really teaching much.

            Martijn FaassenF This user is from outside of this forum
            Martijn FaassenF This user is from outside of this forum
            Martijn Faassen
            wrote last edited by
            #53

            @futurebird

            @cwebber

            I use roman numerals as a startup kata in coding dojos, like a workshop to practice pair programming and writing tests and talk about programming practices.

            https://codingdojo.org/kata/RomanNumerals/

            myrmepropagandistF 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Christine Lemmer-WebberC Christine Lemmer-Webber

              Armin was once one of the most prolific programmers in Python. Says he never writes code anymore. Seeing more and more people like him write stuff like this on what are supposedly computer programming forums. https://lobste.rs/s/qmjejh/ai_is_slowly_munching_away_my_passion#c_jcgdju

              Notably, once a person crosses this threshold, I see them still hang out on programming forums, but they never talk about any of the puzzles of programming anymore. Only about running agents. Which feels strange and sad. Why hang out on the forums at all then?

              Cap E BaraC This user is from outside of this forum
              Cap E BaraC This user is from outside of this forum
              Cap E Bara
              wrote last edited by
              #54

              @cwebber my only lived experience of this person you link on lobsters is them showing up on every comment on every post even tangentially about LLMs to defend their usage of them, so i'm gonna say "why hang out on the forums" is $$ or ego

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Martijn FaassenF Martijn Faassen

                @futurebird

                @cwebber

                I use roman numerals as a startup kata in coding dojos, like a workshop to practice pair programming and writing tests and talk about programming practices.

                https://codingdojo.org/kata/RomanNumerals/

                myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                myrmepropagandist
                wrote last edited by
                #55

                @faassen @cwebber

                A solution that 5th graders can complete

                elegant? eh

                print("Roman Numerals")

                ones = ["","I","II", "III", "IV", "V","VI", "VII", "VIII", "IX"]
                tens = ["", "X", "XX","XXX", "XL", "L", "LX", "LXX", "LXXX", "XC"]
                hundreds = ["", "C", "CC", "CCC", "CD", "D", "DC", "DCC", "DCC", "CM"]
                thousands = ["", "M", "MM", "MMM"]

                n = input("enter a number 1 to 3999")
                n=int(n)

                m=n//1000
                n=n-m*1000

                h=n//100
                n=n-h*100

                t=n//10
                n=n-t*10

                print(thousands[m]+hundreds[h]+tens[t]+ones[n])

                Martijn FaassenF 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

                  @cwebber

                  I don't really get how one could use an LLM to help with coding without reading the code?

                  That's baffling. But I don't make apps I teach young people to think and solve problems. So maybe that's why I don't get it.

                  Martijn FaassenF This user is from outside of this forum
                  Martijn FaassenF This user is from outside of this forum
                  Martijn Faassen
                  wrote last edited by
                  #56

                  @futurebird

                  @cwebber

                  I think LLMs enable a new form of reuse in programming. Previously you could reuse abstraction, or copy code and adjust it. LLMs lets you reuse patterns. It has aspects of both other forms of reuse.

                  With abstractions and sometimes copy and paste we reuse without fully understanding how the thing works in detail. That's fine and useful and has drawbacks too. LLM reuse also allows choosing how much to understand.

                  LLMs, when run as an agent, have more levels, not only do they have access to patterns of code but also to patterns of coding; compile, run tests, debug, etc. So reuse of activity, somewhat similar to development tools but pattern based.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Christine Lemmer-WebberC Christine Lemmer-Webber

                    Armin was once one of the most prolific programmers in Python. Says he never writes code anymore. Seeing more and more people like him write stuff like this on what are supposedly computer programming forums. https://lobste.rs/s/qmjejh/ai_is_slowly_munching_away_my_passion#c_jcgdju

                    Notably, once a person crosses this threshold, I see them still hang out on programming forums, but they never talk about any of the puzzles of programming anymore. Only about running agents. Which feels strange and sad. Why hang out on the forums at all then?

                    Cap E BaraC This user is from outside of this forum
                    Cap E BaraC This user is from outside of this forum
                    Cap E Bara
                    wrote last edited by
                    #57

                    @cwebber the other answer to "why hang out on the forums at all then" is: what else are they gonna do while their laptop is busy rentin sloptokens from billionaires? their actual jobs?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Christine Lemmer-WebberC Christine Lemmer-Webber

                      Feeling FOMO about AI? Well here's my advice!

                      Stay on top of what's happening. Which doesn't really require *using* the tools. Just see what people are doing.

                      Whether or not you do use it, stay a practitioner. And don't fall for the FOMO.

                      Your career won't end because you're not making the choice to use AI. (If your employer makes you use it, that's another thing.)

                      If you use AI, use it for "summarize and explore" tasks. DO NOT use it for *generate* tasks. That's a different thing.

                      If you want to differentiate yourself, *learning skills* is the differentiation space right now.

                      These things are easy to pick up. You can do it whenever. But keep learning.

                      If you see generated examples, don't paste or accept them. Type them in by hand! The hands on imperative: actually trying things congeals core ideas.

                      And if it doesn't help your career... well, your consolation prize is: you'll stay interesting.

                      Woke Leftist TrashA This user is from outside of this forum
                      Woke Leftist TrashA This user is from outside of this forum
                      Woke Leftist Trash
                      wrote last edited by
                      #58

                      @cwebber i'm staying interesting and unemployed. woot. 😅

                      I'm not a user of such tools but I am afraid that whatever AI auto summary is reading my resume is looking up my website and socials and not recommending me due to my stance on these issues.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

                        @faassen @cwebber

                        A solution that 5th graders can complete

                        elegant? eh

                        print("Roman Numerals")

                        ones = ["","I","II", "III", "IV", "V","VI", "VII", "VIII", "IX"]
                        tens = ["", "X", "XX","XXX", "XL", "L", "LX", "LXX", "LXXX", "XC"]
                        hundreds = ["", "C", "CC", "CCC", "CD", "D", "DC", "DCC", "DCC", "CM"]
                        thousands = ["", "M", "MM", "MMM"]

                        n = input("enter a number 1 to 3999")
                        n=int(n)

                        m=n//1000
                        n=n-m*1000

                        h=n//100
                        n=n-h*100

                        t=n//10
                        n=n-t*10

                        print(thousands[m]+hundreds[h]+tens[t]+ones[n])

                        Martijn FaassenF This user is from outside of this forum
                        Martijn FaassenF This user is from outside of this forum
                        Martijn Faassen
                        wrote last edited by
                        #59

                        @futurebird

                        @cwebber

                        Very nice! I have watched experienced devs have to work at this too. They often lean towards overcomplicating things because they want to avoid hardcoding the patterns. But this then leads to a nice little discussion.

                        myrmepropagandistF 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • Christine Lemmer-WebberC Christine Lemmer-Webber

                          Armin was once one of the most prolific programmers in Python. Says he never writes code anymore. Seeing more and more people like him write stuff like this on what are supposedly computer programming forums. https://lobste.rs/s/qmjejh/ai_is_slowly_munching_away_my_passion#c_jcgdju

                          Notably, once a person crosses this threshold, I see them still hang out on programming forums, but they never talk about any of the puzzles of programming anymore. Only about running agents. Which feels strange and sad. Why hang out on the forums at all then?

                          May Likes TorontoM This user is from outside of this forum
                          May Likes TorontoM This user is from outside of this forum
                          May Likes Toronto
                          wrote last edited by
                          #60

                          @cwebber The original linked article here is a really good read.
                          https://whynot.fail/human/ai-is-slowly-munching-away-my-passion/

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Dan SugalskiW Dan Sugalski

                            @cwebber What's telling, I think, is that all these people go on about how much they're doing and how great AI is to help them build more *but there's no actual demonstrable stuff being done.* I mean, if AI was some kind of Nx multiplier you'd think we'd be getting N times more actual functionality out of software but mostly it seems like the N multiplier only applies to blog posts about how AI multiplies their programming.

                            Woke Leftist TrashA This user is from outside of this forum
                            Woke Leftist TrashA This user is from outside of this forum
                            Woke Leftist Trash
                            wrote last edited by
                            #61

                            @wordshaper @cwebber every line of code is a liability. it's funny that suddenly "lines of code generated" is a metric and they're all smiling, proud.

                            meanwhile... some AWS agent decided to rewrite half the code base on its own and deploy it to production which took down some important AWS services.

                            we'll just keep generating more, faster. tech debt creation at scale.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • Chris BurgessX Chris Burgess

                              @cwebber identity, community, established relationships, safety of a known space?

                              (I don't know this individual, answering in the general sense)

                              Chris BurgessX This user is from outside of this forum
                              Chris BurgessX This user is from outside of this forum
                              Chris Burgess
                              wrote last edited by
                              #62

                              @cwebber on reflection, "I am no longer a part of community X" is probably a big step for hearts to take, even when original criteria for membership are no longer met

                              Even when humans stray FAR from a community, I think they can identify/feel it quite differently! ("I'm the only remaining true member of community X")

                              Yes X is a wryly amusing placeholder to me rn lol

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • Dan SugalskiW Dan Sugalski

                                @cwebber What's telling, I think, is that all these people go on about how much they're doing and how great AI is to help them build more *but there's no actual demonstrable stuff being done.* I mean, if AI was some kind of Nx multiplier you'd think we'd be getting N times more actual functionality out of software but mostly it seems like the N multiplier only applies to blog posts about how AI multiplies their programming.

                                Messieur PhoqueG This user is from outside of this forum
                                Messieur PhoqueG This user is from outside of this forum
                                Messieur Phoque
                                wrote last edited by
                                #63

                                @wordshaper @cwebber I don't think you appreciate just how many man years go into writing production level code. My productivity has tripled but if takes weeks to get a prototype in front of 100k+ users. Is not like we're going to release clawd and watch the world burn

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • Christine Lemmer-WebberC Christine Lemmer-Webber

                                  Armin was once one of the most prolific programmers in Python. Says he never writes code anymore. Seeing more and more people like him write stuff like this on what are supposedly computer programming forums. https://lobste.rs/s/qmjejh/ai_is_slowly_munching_away_my_passion#c_jcgdju

                                  Notably, once a person crosses this threshold, I see them still hang out on programming forums, but they never talk about any of the puzzles of programming anymore. Only about running agents. Which feels strange and sad. Why hang out on the forums at all then?

                                  alysA This user is from outside of this forum
                                  alysA This user is from outside of this forum
                                  alys
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #64

                                  @cwebber yeah, even without my and many others’ objections to LLMs, it’s depressing to read about someone essentially giving up a skill.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • Martijn FaassenF Martijn Faassen

                                    @futurebird

                                    @cwebber

                                    Very nice! I have watched experienced devs have to work at this too. They often lean towards overcomplicating things because they want to avoid hardcoding the patterns. But this then leads to a nice little discussion.

                                    myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                                    myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                                    myrmepropagandist
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #65

                                    @faassen @cwebber

                                    This is a funny question because it's kind of got a few built in traps. And then you are writing some function to determine if a number is "one less than a group symbol" and your code looks like a pile of ASCII.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • JWcph, Radicalized By DecencyJ JWcph, Radicalized By Decency

                                      @cwebber Also, don't use it for "summarize" because it literally can't do that.

                                      https://ea.rna.nl/2024/05/27/when-chatgpt-summarises-it-actually-does-nothing-of-the-kind/

                                      Rainer Agentic Quantum RehakR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Rainer Agentic Quantum RehakR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Rainer Agentic Quantum Rehak
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #66

                                      @jwcph @cwebber Also see “ChatGPT trust is risky, as a recent study by the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) shows. The association of 68 public broadcasters from 56 countries systematically tested the reliability of the most popular AI systems. The alarming result: ChatGPT, Gemini, and other chatbots invent up to 40 percent of their answers and present them as facts.”

                                      EBU – European Broadcasting Union (2025) News Integrity in AI Assistants. An international PSM study, https://www.ebu.ch/Report/MIS-BBC/NI_AI_2025.pdf

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • R ActivityRelay shared this topic
                                      Reply
                                      • Reply as topic
                                      Log in to reply
                                      • Oldest to Newest
                                      • Newest to Oldest
                                      • Most Votes


                                      • Login

                                      • Don't have an account? Register

                                      • Login or register to search.
                                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • Categories
                                      • Recent
                                      • Tags
                                      • Popular
                                      • World
                                      • Users
                                      • Groups