Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. General Medicine
  3. I find it interesting that a reporter found Oliver Sacks confessing to fabricating patients for his books *in his own words in his own journals* and this revelation just kind of bounced off of the world.

I find it interesting that a reporter found Oliver Sacks confessing to fabricating patients for his books *in his own words in his own journals* and this revelation just kind of bounced off of the world.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Medicine
writingneurologymedicine
4 Posts 2 Posters 15 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Brian VastagB This user is from outside of this forum
    Brian VastagB This user is from outside of this forum
    Brian Vastag
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    I find it interesting that a reporter found Oliver Sacks confessing to fabricating patients for his books *in his own words in his own journals* and this revelation just kind of bounced off of the world.

    His reputation seems to have not taken a hit as far as I can tell. If this happened to a living writer I think there'd be large repercussions for that person's career.

    Rachel Aviv & The New Yorker handled the reporting and writing deftly and with sensitivity...maybe that's why. A headline blaring that Sacks was a fabulist probably would've had more impact.

    Oliver Sacks Put Himself Into His Case Studies. What Was the Cost? | The New Yorker
    https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2025/12/15/oliver-sacks-put-himself-into-his-case-studies-what-was-the-cost

    #medicine #neurology #writing

    RFanciolaR 1 Reply Last reply
    1
    0
    • #medicineT #medicine shared this topic on
    • Brian VastagB Brian Vastag

      I find it interesting that a reporter found Oliver Sacks confessing to fabricating patients for his books *in his own words in his own journals* and this revelation just kind of bounced off of the world.

      His reputation seems to have not taken a hit as far as I can tell. If this happened to a living writer I think there'd be large repercussions for that person's career.

      Rachel Aviv & The New Yorker handled the reporting and writing deftly and with sensitivity...maybe that's why. A headline blaring that Sacks was a fabulist probably would've had more impact.

      Oliver Sacks Put Himself Into His Case Studies. What Was the Cost? | The New Yorker
      https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2025/12/15/oliver-sacks-put-himself-into-his-case-studies-what-was-the-cost

      #medicine #neurology #writing

      RFanciolaR This user is from outside of this forum
      RFanciolaR This user is from outside of this forum
      RFanciola
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      @brianvastag What he wrote wasn't a research paper, it was literature, and therefore this accusations don't standard all.

      Brian VastagB 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • RFanciolaR RFanciola

        @brianvastag What he wrote wasn't a research paper, it was literature, and therefore this accusations don't standard all.

        Brian VastagB This user is from outside of this forum
        Brian VastagB This user is from outside of this forum
        Brian Vastag
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        @RFancio His books were and are marketed and sold as non-fiction, as were his pieces for The New Yorker. Amazon puts most of his books in their "medicine/neuroscience" section. Aviv reported Sacks's own words from his own journals admitting to fabricating patients and stories, such as the autistic twins who could supposedly instantly factoring 21-digit numbers. So it's not an accusation, it's reporting Sacks's own confessions.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Brian VastagB Brian Vastag

          @RFancio His books were and are marketed and sold as non-fiction, as were his pieces for The New Yorker. Amazon puts most of his books in their "medicine/neuroscience" section. Aviv reported Sacks's own words from his own journals admitting to fabricating patients and stories, such as the autistic twins who could supposedly instantly factoring 21-digit numbers. So it's not an accusation, it's reporting Sacks's own confessions.

          RFanciolaR This user is from outside of this forum
          RFanciolaR This user is from outside of this forum
          RFanciola
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          @brianvastag But not research

          1 Reply Last reply
          0

          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

          With your input, this post could be even better đź’—

          Register Login
          Reply
          • Reply as topic
          Log in to reply
          • Oldest to Newest
          • Newest to Oldest
          • Most Votes


          • Login

          • Don't have an account? Register

          • Login or register to search.
          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
          • First post
            Last post
          0
          • Categories
          • Recent
          • Tags
          • Popular
          • World
          • Users
          • Groups