Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. If you use AI-generated code, you currently cannot claim copyright on it in the US.

If you use AI-generated code, you currently cannot claim copyright on it in the US.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
178 Posts 93 Posters 5 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Jamie GaskinsJ Jamie Gaskins

    @emma Oh yeah, shit's gonna get weird for a while and I think a lot of legislation going in during this administration as well as recent SCOTUS cases will need to be revisited. Ideally after also instituting laws around conflicts of interest with government officials that don't carve out exceptions for, oh I dunno, members of Congress, for example.

    Basically, I want the different branches of the government to fight each other again rather than the different parties.

    Emma needs ☕️ and paying workE This user is from outside of this forum
    Emma needs ☕️ and paying workE This user is from outside of this forum
    Emma needs ☕️ and paying work
    wrote last edited by
    #43

    @jamie the US needs a new constitution, but the right wingers, the religious gooners, and the billionaires should have no say in it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • aevaA aeva

      @SnoopJ @xgranade @jamie ok, but i refuse to retract my pointing at the screen and nelson-from-the-simpsons-laugh that the original post inspired

      SnoopJS This user is from outside of this forum
      SnoopJS This user is from outside of this forum
      SnoopJ
      wrote last edited by
      #44

      @aeva @xgranade @jamie agreed, you can have my HAW-HAW when you pry it from my cold dead throat

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Jamie GaskinsJ Jamie Gaskins

        If you use AI-generated code, you currently cannot claim copyright on it in the US. If you fail to disclose/disclaim exactly which parts were not written by a human, you forfeit your copyright claim on *the entire codebase*.

        This means copyright notices and even licenses folks are putting on their vibe-coded GitHub repos are unenforceable. The AI-generated code, and possibly the whole project, becomes public domain.

        Source: https://www.congress.gov/crs_external_products/LSB/PDF/LSB10922/LSB10922.8.pdf

        garyG This user is from outside of this forum
        garyG This user is from outside of this forum
        gary
        wrote last edited by
        #45

        @jamie china is the main producer of models with open weights, open source ai, china is pushing the evolution of ai forward - what's next? probably 10x compute for smb sector

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Jamie GaskinsJ Jamie Gaskins

          If you use AI-generated code, you currently cannot claim copyright on it in the US. If you fail to disclose/disclaim exactly which parts were not written by a human, you forfeit your copyright claim on *the entire codebase*.

          This means copyright notices and even licenses folks are putting on their vibe-coded GitHub repos are unenforceable. The AI-generated code, and possibly the whole project, becomes public domain.

          Source: https://www.congress.gov/crs_external_products/LSB/PDF/LSB10922/LSB10922.8.pdf

          Celeste Ryder 🐾 🐀🏳️‍🌈B This user is from outside of this forum
          Celeste Ryder 🐾 🐀🏳️‍🌈B This user is from outside of this forum
          Celeste Ryder 🐾 🐀🏳️‍🌈
          wrote last edited by
          #46

          @jamie so… Windows is now fair game?

          Jamie GaskinsJ 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Jamie GaskinsJ Jamie Gaskins

            If you use AI-generated code, you currently cannot claim copyright on it in the US. If you fail to disclose/disclaim exactly which parts were not written by a human, you forfeit your copyright claim on *the entire codebase*.

            This means copyright notices and even licenses folks are putting on their vibe-coded GitHub repos are unenforceable. The AI-generated code, and possibly the whole project, becomes public domain.

            Source: https://www.congress.gov/crs_external_products/LSB/PDF/LSB10922/LSB10922.8.pdf

            LΞX/NØVΛ 🇪🇺L This user is from outside of this forum
            LΞX/NØVΛ 🇪🇺L This user is from outside of this forum
            LΞX/NØVΛ 🇪🇺
            wrote last edited by
            #47

            @jamie in the US, outside of the US exist, and when i don't like AI, until other country rules AI code is not copyrightable ... it remain copyrightable on the whole world BUT US.

            so not it does not automatically become public domain

            (And again i'm against AI).

            Jamie GaskinsJ 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Jamie GaskinsJ Jamie Gaskins

              FWIW I'm not a lawyer and I'm not recommending that you do this. 😄 Even if companies have no legal standing on copyright, their legal team will try it. It *will* cost you money.

              But man, oh man, I'm gonna have popcorn ready for when someone inevitably pulls this move.

              Francisca SinnF This user is from outside of this forum
              Francisca SinnF This user is from outside of this forum
              Francisca Sinn
              wrote last edited by
              #48

              @jamie I *am* an IP lawyer and I (along with many others) have been saying it for a while, that if the position the “AI” co’s are taking with respect to the legality of scraping “publicly available” materials were true (that all “publicly available” materials are “public domain” free to be used as raw materials without consent required), then copyright ceases to exist and all their own materials will be free for everyone else to use the very first time they’re leaked. That’ll be fun for the co.

              Jamie GaskinsJ Max L.M your auntifa liza 🇵🇷  🦛 🦦B AzuaronA Christian SchwägerlC 6 Replies Last reply
              0
              • Jamie GaskinsJ Jamie Gaskins

                If you use AI-generated code, you currently cannot claim copyright on it in the US. If you fail to disclose/disclaim exactly which parts were not written by a human, you forfeit your copyright claim on *the entire codebase*.

                This means copyright notices and even licenses folks are putting on their vibe-coded GitHub repos are unenforceable. The AI-generated code, and possibly the whole project, becomes public domain.

                Source: https://www.congress.gov/crs_external_products/LSB/PDF/LSB10922/LSB10922.8.pdf

                saxnotS This user is from outside of this forum
                saxnotS This user is from outside of this forum
                saxnot
                wrote last edited by
                #49

                @jamie where does it say "the entire codebase"?
                I reas it exactly opposite.

                Copyright on own contributions

                Jamie GaskinsJ 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Jamie GaskinsJ Jamie Gaskins

                  If you use AI-generated code, you currently cannot claim copyright on it in the US. If you fail to disclose/disclaim exactly which parts were not written by a human, you forfeit your copyright claim on *the entire codebase*.

                  This means copyright notices and even licenses folks are putting on their vibe-coded GitHub repos are unenforceable. The AI-generated code, and possibly the whole project, becomes public domain.

                  Source: https://www.congress.gov/crs_external_products/LSB/PDF/LSB10922/LSB10922.8.pdf

                  BagsM This user is from outside of this forum
                  BagsM This user is from outside of this forum
                  Bags
                  wrote last edited by
                  #50

                  @jamie win win for the creatives and for slop-craft

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • tuban_muzuruT tuban_muzuru

                    @jamie

                    Stop whining. You and about seventy zillion terrified sheep running around here bleating about the Terrible AI monster under the bed.

                    mx alex tax1a - 2020 (6)A This user is from outside of this forum
                    mx alex tax1a - 2020 (6)A This user is from outside of this forum
                    mx alex tax1a - 2020 (6)
                    wrote last edited by
                    #51

                    @tuban_muzuru i hope you write a program some day

                    @jamie

                    Jamie GaskinsJ 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • tuban_muzuruT tuban_muzuru

                      @jamie

                      Stop whining. You and about seventy zillion terrified sheep running around here bleating about the Terrible AI monster under the bed.

                      lodditeL This user is from outside of this forum
                      lodditeL This user is from outside of this forum
                      loddite
                      wrote last edited by
                      #52

                      @tuban_muzuru @jamie stop fighting! cant you see youre tearing us apart!!!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Jamie GaskinsJ Jamie Gaskins

                        It'll be interesting to see what happens when a company pisses off an employee to the point where that person creates a public repo containing all the company's AI-generated code. I guarantee what's AI-generated and what's human-written isn't called out anywhere in the code, meaning the entire codebase becomes public domain.

                        While the company may have recourse based on the employment agreement (which varies in enforceability by state), I doubt there'd be any on the basis of copyright.

                        狐ヴィクシーK This user is from outside of this forum
                        狐ヴィクシーK This user is from outside of this forum
                        狐ヴィクシー
                        wrote last edited by
                        #53

                        @jamie@zomglol.wtf Anthropic claims Claude coded the current version of Claude.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • Donald BallD This user is from outside of this forum
                          Donald BallD This user is from outside of this forum
                          Donald Ball
                          wrote last edited by
                          #54

                          @tuban_muzuru You conduct yourself like a real asshole.

                          tuban_muzuruT 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • LeelooL Leeloo

                            @jamie
                            Well, someone still needs to decide at some point whether to abolish copyright or start enforcing it again, and at that point it could become a huge problem for anyone who has incorporated stolen code into their code base.

                            Jamie GaskinsJ This user is from outside of this forum
                            Jamie GaskinsJ This user is from outside of this forum
                            Jamie Gaskins
                            wrote last edited by
                            #55

                            @leeloo Strong agree!

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • 0xC0DEC0DE07EAC 0xC0DEC0DE07EA

                              @jamie I wonder if that’ll kill the use of “AI” at work

                              Jamie GaskinsJ This user is from outside of this forum
                              Jamie GaskinsJ This user is from outside of this forum
                              Jamie Gaskins
                              wrote last edited by
                              #56

                              @c0dec0dec0de I'm honestly surprised that startups take on this risk.

                              0xC0DEC0DE07EAC 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • ulveon.net (on derg.social)U ulveon.net (on derg.social)

                                @jamie@zomglol.wtf and how do you know if something is AI?

                                Jamie GaskinsJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                Jamie GaskinsJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                Jamie Gaskins
                                wrote last edited by
                                #57

                                @ulveon In the scenario I mentioned further down the thread where someone posts a company's code on a public git repo, they'll testify to that in court.

                                I have no doubt that companies will try to claim everything is artisanal, organic, ethically sourced, locally grown

                                For repos that are already public, that's a different topic and that code gets appropriated without attribution all the time as it is. I'm more interested in how this will impact risk factors in for-profit software development.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • Celeste Ryder 🐾 🐀🏳️‍🌈B Celeste Ryder 🐾 🐀🏳️‍🌈

                                  @jamie so… Windows is now fair game?

                                  Jamie GaskinsJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                  Jamie GaskinsJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                  Jamie Gaskins
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #58

                                  @bougiewonderland It would be some poetic justice for a company that stole the whole idea of a GUI and talked down about OSS for decades to lose their copyright and for that GUI to become public domain explicitly because they couldn't come up with a way to comply with copyright law.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • LΞX/NØVΛ 🇪🇺L LΞX/NØVΛ 🇪🇺

                                    @jamie in the US, outside of the US exist, and when i don't like AI, until other country rules AI code is not copyrightable ... it remain copyrightable on the whole world BUT US.

                                    so not it does not automatically become public domain

                                    (And again i'm against AI).

                                    Jamie GaskinsJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Jamie GaskinsJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Jamie Gaskins
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #59

                                    @lexinova Yeah, my take is very much US-centric because it's the only jurisdiction I'm familiar with.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • Jamie GaskinsJ Jamie Gaskins

                                      If you use AI-generated code, you currently cannot claim copyright on it in the US. If you fail to disclose/disclaim exactly which parts were not written by a human, you forfeit your copyright claim on *the entire codebase*.

                                      This means copyright notices and even licenses folks are putting on their vibe-coded GitHub repos are unenforceable. The AI-generated code, and possibly the whole project, becomes public domain.

                                      Source: https://www.congress.gov/crs_external_products/LSB/PDF/LSB10922/LSB10922.8.pdf

                                      Eli Roberson (he/him)T This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Eli Roberson (he/him)T This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Eli Roberson (he/him)
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #60

                                      @jamie that's interesting. So I guess #Windows11 will be public domain soon.

                                      Dan WS 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • saxnotS saxnot

                                        @jamie where does it say "the entire codebase"?
                                        I reas it exactly opposite.

                                        Copyright on own contributions

                                        Jamie GaskinsJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                        Jamie GaskinsJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                        Jamie Gaskins
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #61

                                        @saxnot In the second screenshot, second bullet point. AFAICT, if you don't disclaim the parts of the work generated by AI, copyright cannot be assigned for the entire work.

                                        The link in that bullet point goes here: https://www.copyright.gov/rulings-filings/review-board/docs/Theatre-Dopera-Spatial.pdf

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • mx alex tax1a - 2020 (6)A mx alex tax1a - 2020 (6)

                                          @tuban_muzuru i hope you write a program some day

                                          @jamie

                                          Jamie GaskinsJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                          Jamie GaskinsJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                          Jamie Gaskins
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #62

                                          @atax1a This is the most incredible clapback I've seen all day. Flawless. No notes.

                                          Cap E BaraC 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups