Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Well, everyone, you can now submit a comment to let the FCC know what you think about SpaceX asking for 1 million satellites for "AI datacenters" whatever the fuck that means.

Well, everyone, you can now submit a comment to let the FCC know what you think about SpaceX asking for 1 million satellites for "AI datacenters" whatever the fuck that means.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
84 Posts 66 Posters 131 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • James ๐ŸŒˆ๐Ÿ’œS This user is from outside of this forum
    James ๐ŸŒˆ๐Ÿ’œS This user is from outside of this forum
    James ๐ŸŒˆ๐Ÿ’œ
    wrote last edited by
    #49

    @lexinova

    Whilst SpaceX and OneWeb are "excited" abput satelite in 5G - its not actually deployed anywhere at all, yet. Just promises since 2020.

    4G satelite systems are backhaul, and cover about 0.5% of deployed systems. The kind of places where bad cloud cover means you don't have satelite, either. Cat3 remote type places.

    Musk will probably notice if we lost 4G sat, and make some pissy tweets. Most people won't even notice.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Nonya Bidniss :CIAverified: ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธN Nonya Bidniss :CIAverified: ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ

      @sundogplanets Maybe that's what it's going to take to teach the world and especially the U.S. that the billionaires should have been loaded onto a rocket and shot right into the fucking sun

      Petra van CronenburgN This user is from outside of this forum
      Petra van CronenburgN This user is from outside of this forum
      Petra van Cronenburg
      wrote last edited by
      #50

      @Nonya_Bidniss better idea than Mars. More sustainable. ๐Ÿ˜ @sundogplanets

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Eric LawtonE Eric Lawton

        @sundogplanets

        I appreciate any Americans that submit a complaint, but who exactly gave an American regulatory body authority over the whole of low Earth orbit and beyond?

        Colonial theft.

        @PhoenixSerenity

        Petra van CronenburgN This user is from outside of this forum
        Petra van CronenburgN This user is from outside of this forum
        Petra van Cronenburg
        wrote last edited by
        #51

        @EricLawton ๐Ÿ’ฏ @sundogplanets @PhoenixSerenity

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • bitB bit

          @sundogplanets

          Why would they even want AI datacenters in space? We haven't solved how to cool them without massive amounts of water down here on earth, how are they going to cool them up there? Some months back I read of someone else wanting to create the same datacenters in international waters. Is this just a new way for them to try to avoid legal liability? If that's the case, I wonder what kind of content they will generate up there.

          MinaM This user is from outside of this forum
          MinaM This user is from outside of this forum
          Mina
          wrote last edited by
          #52

          @bit

          I believe, they have the idea that space is really cold, and their machines will need no cooling there.

          @sundogplanets

          bitB 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

            Well, everyone, you can now submit a comment to let the FCC know what you think about SpaceX asking for 1 million satellites for "AI datacenters" whatever the fuck that means.

            https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-26-113A1.pdf

            Comments due March 6.

            I am having a very hard time believing this is really happening. Fuck you, SpaceX, and fuck you, FCC. This is not regulation, this is a fucking joke, that will destroy our ability to use satellites for centuries.

            Andrew RichensA This user is from outside of this forum
            Andrew RichensA This user is from outside of this forum
            Andrew Richens
            wrote last edited by
            #53

            @sundogplanets Many thanks for sharing the link - I wasn't aware of his at all. Absolutely disgusting! I shall be submitting some 'developmental feedback' to the FCC!

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

              Well, everyone, you can now submit a comment to let the FCC know what you think about SpaceX asking for 1 million satellites for "AI datacenters" whatever the fuck that means.

              https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-26-113A1.pdf

              Comments due March 6.

              I am having a very hard time believing this is really happening. Fuck you, SpaceX, and fuck you, FCC. This is not regulation, this is a fucking joke, that will destroy our ability to use satellites for centuries.

              tizilogicT This user is from outside of this forum
              tizilogicT This user is from outside of this forum
              tizilogic
              wrote last edited by
              #54

              @sundogplanets ๐Ÿคฆ๐Ÿคฆ๐Ÿคฆ๐Ÿคฆ๐Ÿคฆ

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • MinaM Mina

                @bit

                I believe, they have the idea that space is really cold, and their machines will need no cooling there.

                @sundogplanets

                bitB This user is from outside of this forum
                bitB This user is from outside of this forum
                bit
                wrote last edited by
                #55

                @mina @sundogplanets

                I read an article about this, and there was a discussion section, and someone there was making this very argument that space is cold so cooling won't be required, which I thought at the time made total sense. But then someone else brought up the fact the ISS actually has trouble cooling itself, because while yes space is cold, there is so little matter around, it remains very difficult to dissipate heat. So now I'm not so sure.

                MinaM M BerberichM mkjM 3 Replies Last reply
                0
                • Eric LawtonE Eric Lawton

                  @sundogplanets

                  I appreciate any Americans that submit a complaint, but who exactly gave an American regulatory body authority over the whole of low Earth orbit and beyond?

                  Colonial theft.

                  @PhoenixSerenity

                  SibylleS This user is from outside of this forum
                  SibylleS This user is from outside of this forum
                  Sibylle
                  wrote last edited by
                  #56

                  @sundogplanets @PhoenixSerenity @EricLawton I think we - non US people - have to turn to our governments to tell them to stop this insanity.

                  Not that I have much confidence in the swiss gov, tough...

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • bitB bit

                    @mina @sundogplanets

                    I read an article about this, and there was a discussion section, and someone there was making this very argument that space is cold so cooling won't be required, which I thought at the time made total sense. But then someone else brought up the fact the ISS actually has trouble cooling itself, because while yes space is cold, there is so little matter around, it remains very difficult to dissipate heat. So now I'm not so sure.

                    MinaM This user is from outside of this forum
                    MinaM This user is from outside of this forum
                    Mina
                    wrote last edited by
                    #57

                    @bit

                    That's the point.

                    The only way to lose heat in space is through radiation.

                    I guess, tech bros learn their physics from chatboxes.

                    I also wonder, how they plan to protect their data centres from cosmic radiation.

                    @sundogplanets

                    M BerberichM Reinald KirchnerR Sepia FanS 3 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • MinaM Mina

                      @bit

                      That's the point.

                      The only way to lose heat in space is through radiation.

                      I guess, tech bros learn their physics from chatboxes.

                      I also wonder, how they plan to protect their data centres from cosmic radiation.

                      @sundogplanets

                      M BerberichM This user is from outside of this forum
                      M BerberichM This user is from outside of this forum
                      M Berberich
                      wrote last edited by
                      #58

                      @mina @bit @sundogplanets

                      They might not have learned anything and know nothing of physics.

                      They might have asked ChatGPT.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • MinaM Mina

                        @bit

                        That's the point.

                        The only way to lose heat in space is through radiation.

                        I guess, tech bros learn their physics from chatboxes.

                        I also wonder, how they plan to protect their data centres from cosmic radiation.

                        @sundogplanets

                        Reinald KirchnerR This user is from outside of this forum
                        Reinald KirchnerR This user is from outside of this forum
                        Reinald Kirchner
                        wrote last edited by
                        #59

                        @bit @sundogplanets @mina I heard the 486 CPU generations were way more robust against radiation 'cause of there larger structures. Maybe they get popular again. ๐Ÿซฃ

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • bitB bit

                          @mina @sundogplanets

                          I read an article about this, and there was a discussion section, and someone there was making this very argument that space is cold so cooling won't be required, which I thought at the time made total sense. But then someone else brought up the fact the ISS actually has trouble cooling itself, because while yes space is cold, there is so little matter around, it remains very difficult to dissipate heat. So now I'm not so sure.

                          M BerberichM This user is from outside of this forum
                          M BerberichM This user is from outside of this forum
                          M Berberich
                          wrote last edited by
                          #60

                          @bit @mina @sundogplanets

                          Space is not cold.
                          Temperature is a property of matter. In space there is noยน matter, so no temperature.

                          __________
                          ยน There is matter in space, but as it is a ultra-high vacuum, the density is so low that you can completely ignore it in this context.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Conny NaschC This user is from outside of this forum
                            Conny NaschC This user is from outside of this forum
                            Conny Nasch
                            wrote last edited by
                            #61

                            @Doomed_Daniel @mmcknett @kiri @sundogplanets The voice of reason was noted in the comments to this very clarifying article. I am an artist/painter and not engineer, (my father and partner are), I am fascinated by engineering and science though. Thank you for this super perspective on the subject I watched last night on 3Sat "Nano", which chilled me to the bone.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                              Well, everyone, you can now submit a comment to let the FCC know what you think about SpaceX asking for 1 million satellites for "AI datacenters" whatever the fuck that means.

                              https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-26-113A1.pdf

                              Comments due March 6.

                              I am having a very hard time believing this is really happening. Fuck you, SpaceX, and fuck you, FCC. This is not regulation, this is a fucking joke, that will destroy our ability to use satellites for centuries.

                              Graeme ๐Ÿด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ณ๓ ฃ๓ ด๓ ฟP This user is from outside of this forum
                              Graeme ๐Ÿด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ณ๓ ฃ๓ ด๓ ฟP This user is from outside of this forum
                              Graeme ๐Ÿด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ณ๓ ฃ๓ ด๓ ฟ
                              wrote last edited by
                              #62

                              @sundogplanets This is more about the upcoming ipo than reality. It's to make dumb investors wet themselves with excitement. At that level, it'll probably work...
                              But still, needs a big NO from the FCC, who should not be the arbiter anyway, it's an international issue.
                              I wonder what the Chinese think about it?!!

                              Little Art HistoriesA 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • Graeme ๐Ÿด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ณ๓ ฃ๓ ด๓ ฟP Graeme ๐Ÿด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ณ๓ ฃ๓ ด๓ ฟ

                                @sundogplanets This is more about the upcoming ipo than reality. It's to make dumb investors wet themselves with excitement. At that level, it'll probably work...
                                But still, needs a big NO from the FCC, who should not be the arbiter anyway, it's an international issue.
                                I wonder what the Chinese think about it?!!

                                Little Art HistoriesA This user is from outside of this forum
                                Little Art HistoriesA This user is from outside of this forum
                                Little Art Histories
                                wrote last edited by
                                #63

                                @pa27 @sundogplanets
                                Definitely. Investors already start asking when they are going to see revenue from the investments they made so our beloved tech-bros need a new flashy thing to distract from the fact that they are playing the Theranos-game all over again, raking in nonsensical amounts of money with the added bonus of destructing societies and the world.

                                But maybe everything is just a ploy to get the Chinese and Russians to die from laughter about the stupidity of the west?

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • MinaM Mina

                                  @bit

                                  That's the point.

                                  The only way to lose heat in space is through radiation.

                                  I guess, tech bros learn their physics from chatboxes.

                                  I also wonder, how they plan to protect their data centres from cosmic radiation.

                                  @sundogplanets

                                  Sepia FanS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  Sepia FanS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  Sepia Fan
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #64

                                  @mina @bit @sundogplanets

                                  Deutschlandfunk had an interview with Prof. Dr.-Ing. Felix Huber (director of GSOC - German Space Operations Center) about this topic yesterday - and they discussed all the points. To me he sounded increasingly annoyed ;D

                                  - mass
                                  - size
                                  - space debris
                                  - heat
                                  - radiation
                                  - tech ageing
                                  - maintenance
                                  - replacement
                                  - de-orbiting
                                  - atmospheric pollution
                                  - communication
                                  - CO2 emissions

                                  Conclusion: ๐Ÿšฎ

                                  ๐ŸŽง German, 5 min:
                                  https://www.deutschlandfunk.de/ki-aus-dem-all-wie-realistisch-sind-weltraumgestuetzte-rechenzentren-100.html

                                  MinaM 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • Sepia FanS Sepia Fan

                                    @mina @bit @sundogplanets

                                    Deutschlandfunk had an interview with Prof. Dr.-Ing. Felix Huber (director of GSOC - German Space Operations Center) about this topic yesterday - and they discussed all the points. To me he sounded increasingly annoyed ;D

                                    - mass
                                    - size
                                    - space debris
                                    - heat
                                    - radiation
                                    - tech ageing
                                    - maintenance
                                    - replacement
                                    - de-orbiting
                                    - atmospheric pollution
                                    - communication
                                    - CO2 emissions

                                    Conclusion: ๐Ÿšฎ

                                    ๐ŸŽง German, 5 min:
                                    https://www.deutschlandfunk.de/ki-aus-dem-all-wie-realistisch-sind-weltraumgestuetzte-rechenzentren-100.html

                                    MinaM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    MinaM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Mina
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #65

                                    @stekopf

                                    Gleich mal hรถren.

                                    @bit @sundogplanets

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                                      Well, everyone, you can now submit a comment to let the FCC know what you think about SpaceX asking for 1 million satellites for "AI datacenters" whatever the fuck that means.

                                      https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-26-113A1.pdf

                                      Comments due March 6.

                                      I am having a very hard time believing this is really happening. Fuck you, SpaceX, and fuck you, FCC. This is not regulation, this is a fucking joke, that will destroy our ability to use satellites for centuries.

                                      gunstickG This user is from outside of this forum
                                      gunstickG This user is from outside of this forum
                                      gunstick
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #66

                                      @sundogplanets the environment agency should have their word to say. Because all these millions of datacenters are going to be disposed off... And they won't be recycled. Just burned up. In the open. No filters. No catalysators. Just burned in the atmosphere.

                                      emmatonkinE 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • Awk & shaM Awk & sha

                                        @kiri @sundogplanets youโ€™re not missing anything; this is absolutely the problem with data centers, structures famously constrained by their ability to reject heat, in space, a place famous for its insulative properties. Itโ€™s stupid.

                                        Not to mention that data centers require maintenance and equipment replacement. This aspect of data centers is why companies decided not to put them in the ocean (where heat would be easier to reject). How do they think theyโ€™ll do maintenance? Or do the satellites just become trash after a few years?

                                        Eliza MBO This user is from outside of this forum
                                        Eliza MBO This user is from outside of this forum
                                        Eliza MB
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #67

                                        @mmcknett @kiri @sundogplanets

                                        I suspect Musk knows this won't work. He doesn't care so long as more naive investors throw money at him.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • gunstickG gunstick

                                          @sundogplanets the environment agency should have their word to say. Because all these millions of datacenters are going to be disposed off... And they won't be recycled. Just burned up. In the open. No filters. No catalysators. Just burned in the atmosphere.

                                          emmatonkinE This user is from outside of this forum
                                          emmatonkinE This user is from outside of this forum
                                          emmatonkin
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #68

                                          @gunstick @sundogplanets

                                          TBH as someone with direct experience of existing "AI datacenters" I feel like there should be a literal sanity check involved somewhere. At this point you might as well ask for 1 million satellites for isolating the voice of Azathoth the Nuclear Chaos: at least that would be something you might conceivably need to be in space to do.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups