Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Well, everyone, you can now submit a comment to let the FCC know what you think about SpaceX asking for 1 million satellites for "AI datacenters" whatever the fuck that means.

Well, everyone, you can now submit a comment to let the FCC know what you think about SpaceX asking for 1 million satellites for "AI datacenters" whatever the fuck that means.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
84 Posts 66 Posters 131 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

    Well, everyone, you can now submit a comment to let the FCC know what you think about SpaceX asking for 1 million satellites for "AI datacenters" whatever the fuck that means.

    https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-26-113A1.pdf

    Comments due March 6.

    I am having a very hard time believing this is really happening. Fuck you, SpaceX, and fuck you, FCC. This is not regulation, this is a fucking joke, that will destroy our ability to use satellites for centuries.

    Andrew RichensA This user is from outside of this forum
    Andrew RichensA This user is from outside of this forum
    Andrew Richens
    wrote last edited by
    #53

    @sundogplanets Many thanks for sharing the link - I wasn't aware of his at all. Absolutely disgusting! I shall be submitting some 'developmental feedback' to the FCC!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

      Well, everyone, you can now submit a comment to let the FCC know what you think about SpaceX asking for 1 million satellites for "AI datacenters" whatever the fuck that means.

      https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-26-113A1.pdf

      Comments due March 6.

      I am having a very hard time believing this is really happening. Fuck you, SpaceX, and fuck you, FCC. This is not regulation, this is a fucking joke, that will destroy our ability to use satellites for centuries.

      tizilogicT This user is from outside of this forum
      tizilogicT This user is from outside of this forum
      tizilogic
      wrote last edited by
      #54

      @sundogplanets 🤦🤦🤦🤦🤦

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • MinaM Mina

        @bit

        I believe, they have the idea that space is really cold, and their machines will need no cooling there.

        @sundogplanets

        bitB This user is from outside of this forum
        bitB This user is from outside of this forum
        bit
        wrote last edited by
        #55

        @mina @sundogplanets

        I read an article about this, and there was a discussion section, and someone there was making this very argument that space is cold so cooling won't be required, which I thought at the time made total sense. But then someone else brought up the fact the ISS actually has trouble cooling itself, because while yes space is cold, there is so little matter around, it remains very difficult to dissipate heat. So now I'm not so sure.

        MinaM M BerberichM mkjM 3 Replies Last reply
        0
        • Eric LawtonE Eric Lawton

          @sundogplanets

          I appreciate any Americans that submit a complaint, but who exactly gave an American regulatory body authority over the whole of low Earth orbit and beyond?

          Colonial theft.

          @PhoenixSerenity

          SibylleS This user is from outside of this forum
          SibylleS This user is from outside of this forum
          Sibylle
          wrote last edited by
          #56

          @sundogplanets @PhoenixSerenity @EricLawton I think we - non US people - have to turn to our governments to tell them to stop this insanity.

          Not that I have much confidence in the swiss gov, tough...

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • bitB bit

            @mina @sundogplanets

            I read an article about this, and there was a discussion section, and someone there was making this very argument that space is cold so cooling won't be required, which I thought at the time made total sense. But then someone else brought up the fact the ISS actually has trouble cooling itself, because while yes space is cold, there is so little matter around, it remains very difficult to dissipate heat. So now I'm not so sure.

            MinaM This user is from outside of this forum
            MinaM This user is from outside of this forum
            Mina
            wrote last edited by
            #57

            @bit

            That's the point.

            The only way to lose heat in space is through radiation.

            I guess, tech bros learn their physics from chatboxes.

            I also wonder, how they plan to protect their data centres from cosmic radiation.

            @sundogplanets

            M BerberichM Reinald KirchnerR Sepia FanS 3 Replies Last reply
            0
            • MinaM Mina

              @bit

              That's the point.

              The only way to lose heat in space is through radiation.

              I guess, tech bros learn their physics from chatboxes.

              I also wonder, how they plan to protect their data centres from cosmic radiation.

              @sundogplanets

              M BerberichM This user is from outside of this forum
              M BerberichM This user is from outside of this forum
              M Berberich
              wrote last edited by
              #58

              @mina @bit @sundogplanets

              They might not have learned anything and know nothing of physics.

              They might have asked ChatGPT.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • MinaM Mina

                @bit

                That's the point.

                The only way to lose heat in space is through radiation.

                I guess, tech bros learn their physics from chatboxes.

                I also wonder, how they plan to protect their data centres from cosmic radiation.

                @sundogplanets

                Reinald KirchnerR This user is from outside of this forum
                Reinald KirchnerR This user is from outside of this forum
                Reinald Kirchner
                wrote last edited by
                #59

                @bit @sundogplanets @mina I heard the 486 CPU generations were way more robust against radiation 'cause of there larger structures. Maybe they get popular again. 🫣

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • bitB bit

                  @mina @sundogplanets

                  I read an article about this, and there was a discussion section, and someone there was making this very argument that space is cold so cooling won't be required, which I thought at the time made total sense. But then someone else brought up the fact the ISS actually has trouble cooling itself, because while yes space is cold, there is so little matter around, it remains very difficult to dissipate heat. So now I'm not so sure.

                  M BerberichM This user is from outside of this forum
                  M BerberichM This user is from outside of this forum
                  M Berberich
                  wrote last edited by
                  #60

                  @bit @mina @sundogplanets

                  Space is not cold.
                  Temperature is a property of matter. In space there is no¹ matter, so no temperature.

                  __________
                  ¹ There is matter in space, but as it is a ultra-high vacuum, the density is so low that you can completely ignore it in this context.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Conny NaschC This user is from outside of this forum
                    Conny NaschC This user is from outside of this forum
                    Conny Nasch
                    wrote last edited by
                    #61

                    @Doomed_Daniel @mmcknett @kiri @sundogplanets The voice of reason was noted in the comments to this very clarifying article. I am an artist/painter and not engineer, (my father and partner are), I am fascinated by engineering and science though. Thank you for this super perspective on the subject I watched last night on 3Sat "Nano", which chilled me to the bone.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                      Well, everyone, you can now submit a comment to let the FCC know what you think about SpaceX asking for 1 million satellites for "AI datacenters" whatever the fuck that means.

                      https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-26-113A1.pdf

                      Comments due March 6.

                      I am having a very hard time believing this is really happening. Fuck you, SpaceX, and fuck you, FCC. This is not regulation, this is a fucking joke, that will destroy our ability to use satellites for centuries.

                      Graeme 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿P This user is from outside of this forum
                      Graeme 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿P This user is from outside of this forum
                      Graeme 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿
                      wrote last edited by
                      #62

                      @sundogplanets This is more about the upcoming ipo than reality. It's to make dumb investors wet themselves with excitement. At that level, it'll probably work...
                      But still, needs a big NO from the FCC, who should not be the arbiter anyway, it's an international issue.
                      I wonder what the Chinese think about it?!!

                      Little Art HistoriesA 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Graeme 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿P Graeme 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿

                        @sundogplanets This is more about the upcoming ipo than reality. It's to make dumb investors wet themselves with excitement. At that level, it'll probably work...
                        But still, needs a big NO from the FCC, who should not be the arbiter anyway, it's an international issue.
                        I wonder what the Chinese think about it?!!

                        Little Art HistoriesA This user is from outside of this forum
                        Little Art HistoriesA This user is from outside of this forum
                        Little Art Histories
                        wrote last edited by
                        #63

                        @pa27 @sundogplanets
                        Definitely. Investors already start asking when they are going to see revenue from the investments they made so our beloved tech-bros need a new flashy thing to distract from the fact that they are playing the Theranos-game all over again, raking in nonsensical amounts of money with the added bonus of destructing societies and the world.

                        But maybe everything is just a ploy to get the Chinese and Russians to die from laughter about the stupidity of the west?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • MinaM Mina

                          @bit

                          That's the point.

                          The only way to lose heat in space is through radiation.

                          I guess, tech bros learn their physics from chatboxes.

                          I also wonder, how they plan to protect their data centres from cosmic radiation.

                          @sundogplanets

                          Sepia FanS This user is from outside of this forum
                          Sepia FanS This user is from outside of this forum
                          Sepia Fan
                          wrote last edited by
                          #64

                          @mina @bit @sundogplanets

                          Deutschlandfunk had an interview with Prof. Dr.-Ing. Felix Huber (director of GSOC - German Space Operations Center) about this topic yesterday - and they discussed all the points. To me he sounded increasingly annoyed ;D

                          - mass
                          - size
                          - space debris
                          - heat
                          - radiation
                          - tech ageing
                          - maintenance
                          - replacement
                          - de-orbiting
                          - atmospheric pollution
                          - communication
                          - CO2 emissions

                          Conclusion: 🚮

                          🎧 German, 5 min:
                          https://www.deutschlandfunk.de/ki-aus-dem-all-wie-realistisch-sind-weltraumgestuetzte-rechenzentren-100.html

                          MinaM 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Sepia FanS Sepia Fan

                            @mina @bit @sundogplanets

                            Deutschlandfunk had an interview with Prof. Dr.-Ing. Felix Huber (director of GSOC - German Space Operations Center) about this topic yesterday - and they discussed all the points. To me he sounded increasingly annoyed ;D

                            - mass
                            - size
                            - space debris
                            - heat
                            - radiation
                            - tech ageing
                            - maintenance
                            - replacement
                            - de-orbiting
                            - atmospheric pollution
                            - communication
                            - CO2 emissions

                            Conclusion: 🚮

                            🎧 German, 5 min:
                            https://www.deutschlandfunk.de/ki-aus-dem-all-wie-realistisch-sind-weltraumgestuetzte-rechenzentren-100.html

                            MinaM This user is from outside of this forum
                            MinaM This user is from outside of this forum
                            Mina
                            wrote last edited by
                            #65

                            @stekopf

                            Gleich mal hören.

                            @bit @sundogplanets

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                              Well, everyone, you can now submit a comment to let the FCC know what you think about SpaceX asking for 1 million satellites for "AI datacenters" whatever the fuck that means.

                              https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-26-113A1.pdf

                              Comments due March 6.

                              I am having a very hard time believing this is really happening. Fuck you, SpaceX, and fuck you, FCC. This is not regulation, this is a fucking joke, that will destroy our ability to use satellites for centuries.

                              gunstickG This user is from outside of this forum
                              gunstickG This user is from outside of this forum
                              gunstick
                              wrote last edited by
                              #66

                              @sundogplanets the environment agency should have their word to say. Because all these millions of datacenters are going to be disposed off... And they won't be recycled. Just burned up. In the open. No filters. No catalysators. Just burned in the atmosphere.

                              emmatonkinE 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • Awk & shaM Awk & sha

                                @kiri @sundogplanets you’re not missing anything; this is absolutely the problem with data centers, structures famously constrained by their ability to reject heat, in space, a place famous for its insulative properties. It’s stupid.

                                Not to mention that data centers require maintenance and equipment replacement. This aspect of data centers is why companies decided not to put them in the ocean (where heat would be easier to reject). How do they think they’ll do maintenance? Or do the satellites just become trash after a few years?

                                Eliza MBO This user is from outside of this forum
                                Eliza MBO This user is from outside of this forum
                                Eliza MB
                                wrote last edited by
                                #67

                                @mmcknett @kiri @sundogplanets

                                I suspect Musk knows this won't work. He doesn't care so long as more naive investors throw money at him.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • gunstickG gunstick

                                  @sundogplanets the environment agency should have their word to say. Because all these millions of datacenters are going to be disposed off... And they won't be recycled. Just burned up. In the open. No filters. No catalysators. Just burned in the atmosphere.

                                  emmatonkinE This user is from outside of this forum
                                  emmatonkinE This user is from outside of this forum
                                  emmatonkin
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #68

                                  @gunstick @sundogplanets

                                  TBH as someone with direct experience of existing "AI datacenters" I feel like there should be a literal sanity check involved somewhere. At this point you might as well ask for 1 million satellites for isolating the voice of Azathoth the Nuclear Chaos: at least that would be something you might conceivably need to be in space to do.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                                    Well, everyone, you can now submit a comment to let the FCC know what you think about SpaceX asking for 1 million satellites for "AI datacenters" whatever the fuck that means.

                                    https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-26-113A1.pdf

                                    Comments due March 6.

                                    I am having a very hard time believing this is really happening. Fuck you, SpaceX, and fuck you, FCC. This is not regulation, this is a fucking joke, that will destroy our ability to use satellites for centuries.

                                    W This user is from outside of this forum
                                    W This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Andy Wootton
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #69

                                    @sundogplanets Why would Trump want sophisticated communication systems to be available to just anyone?

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                                      If anyone has time and energy to set up instructions for how to submit a comment to the FCC (it's really fucking complicated, on purpose, I'm sure), I would very much appreciate it! Otherwise I'll do it in the coming days.

                                      katzenbergerK This user is from outside of this forum
                                      katzenbergerK This user is from outside of this forum
                                      katzenberger
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #70

                                      @sundogplanets

                                      If somebody wants to venture into this, please test all steps.

                                      The first one involves sending an email to ecfs@fcc.gov with "get form" and your email address in the message body.

                                      The reply I got was trying to strangely gaslight me:

                                      "Delivery has failed to these recipients or groups:

                                      ecfs@fcc.gov
                                      Your message couldn't be delivered. The Domain Name System (DNS) reported that the recipient's domain does not exist."

                                      There seems to be a strange subdomain falstaff.fcc.gov involved. The attached error log says:

                                      Diagnostic information for administrators:

                                      Generating server: SJ0PR09MB11735.namprd09.prod.outlook.com

                                      ecfs@fcc.gov
                                      Remote server returned '550 5.4.310 DNS domain falstaff.fcc.gov does not exist [Message=InfoDomainNonexistent] [LastAttemptedServerName=falstaff.fcc.gov] [SA2PEPF00003023.namprd09.prod.outlook.com 2026-02-05T12:30:46.776Z 08DE6078A5284768]'
                                      A 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                                        Well, everyone, you can now submit a comment to let the FCC know what you think about SpaceX asking for 1 million satellites for "AI datacenters" whatever the fuck that means.

                                        https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-26-113A1.pdf

                                        Comments due March 6.

                                        I am having a very hard time believing this is really happening. Fuck you, SpaceX, and fuck you, FCC. This is not regulation, this is a fucking joke, that will destroy our ability to use satellites for centuries.

                                        Bud TalbotB This user is from outside of this forum
                                        Bud TalbotB This user is from outside of this forum
                                        Bud Talbot
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #71

                                        @sundogplanets wtaf??? That's crazy

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                                          Well, everyone, you can now submit a comment to let the FCC know what you think about SpaceX asking for 1 million satellites for "AI datacenters" whatever the fuck that means.

                                          https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-26-113A1.pdf

                                          Comments due March 6.

                                          I am having a very hard time believing this is really happening. Fuck you, SpaceX, and fuck you, FCC. This is not regulation, this is a fucking joke, that will destroy our ability to use satellites for centuries.

                                          Awk & shaM This user is from outside of this forum
                                          Awk & shaM This user is from outside of this forum
                                          Awk & sha
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #72

                                          @sundogplanets any advice on what comments to the FCC should cover?

                                          This is an awful idea, but not because it interferes with radio communications or anything like that. Does the FCC care about things like “this won’t work at all, and after it fails space will be filled with a massive quantity of trash”?

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups