Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Well, everyone, you can now submit a comment to let the FCC know what you think about SpaceX asking for 1 million satellites for "AI datacenters" whatever the fuck that means.

Well, everyone, you can now submit a comment to let the FCC know what you think about SpaceX asking for 1 million satellites for "AI datacenters" whatever the fuck that means.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
84 Posts 66 Posters 131 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

    Well, everyone, you can now submit a comment to let the FCC know what you think about SpaceX asking for 1 million satellites for "AI datacenters" whatever the fuck that means.

    https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-26-113A1.pdf

    Comments due March 6.

    I am having a very hard time believing this is really happening. Fuck you, SpaceX, and fuck you, FCC. This is not regulation, this is a fucking joke, that will destroy our ability to use satellites for centuries.

    D This user is from outside of this forum
    D This user is from outside of this forum
    downbeatdan
    wrote last edited by
    #47

    @sundogplanets Thanks for the great talk tonight in Hamilton Dr Sam. Scary but enlightening... time to spread this widely.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

      Well, everyone, you can now submit a comment to let the FCC know what you think about SpaceX asking for 1 million satellites for "AI datacenters" whatever the fuck that means.

      https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-26-113A1.pdf

      Comments due March 6.

      I am having a very hard time believing this is really happening. Fuck you, SpaceX, and fuck you, FCC. This is not regulation, this is a fucking joke, that will destroy our ability to use satellites for centuries.

      Jean-Baptiste MailletJ This user is from outside of this forum
      Jean-Baptiste MailletJ This user is from outside of this forum
      Jean-Baptiste Maillet
      wrote last edited by
      #48

      @sundogplanets plus space is not only a US thing (until some guy decide he wants a property title on it for some US thing). There is a higher authority for this.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_law

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • James ๐ŸŒˆ๐Ÿ’œS This user is from outside of this forum
        James ๐ŸŒˆ๐Ÿ’œS This user is from outside of this forum
        James ๐ŸŒˆ๐Ÿ’œ
        wrote last edited by
        #49

        @lexinova

        Whilst SpaceX and OneWeb are "excited" abput satelite in 5G - its not actually deployed anywhere at all, yet. Just promises since 2020.

        4G satelite systems are backhaul, and cover about 0.5% of deployed systems. The kind of places where bad cloud cover means you don't have satelite, either. Cat3 remote type places.

        Musk will probably notice if we lost 4G sat, and make some pissy tweets. Most people won't even notice.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Nonya Bidniss :CIAverified: ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธN Nonya Bidniss :CIAverified: ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ

          @sundogplanets Maybe that's what it's going to take to teach the world and especially the U.S. that the billionaires should have been loaded onto a rocket and shot right into the fucking sun

          Petra van CronenburgN This user is from outside of this forum
          Petra van CronenburgN This user is from outside of this forum
          Petra van Cronenburg
          wrote last edited by
          #50

          @Nonya_Bidniss better idea than Mars. More sustainable. ๐Ÿ˜ @sundogplanets

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Eric LawtonE Eric Lawton

            @sundogplanets

            I appreciate any Americans that submit a complaint, but who exactly gave an American regulatory body authority over the whole of low Earth orbit and beyond?

            Colonial theft.

            @PhoenixSerenity

            Petra van CronenburgN This user is from outside of this forum
            Petra van CronenburgN This user is from outside of this forum
            Petra van Cronenburg
            wrote last edited by
            #51

            @EricLawton ๐Ÿ’ฏ @sundogplanets @PhoenixSerenity

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • bitB bit

              @sundogplanets

              Why would they even want AI datacenters in space? We haven't solved how to cool them without massive amounts of water down here on earth, how are they going to cool them up there? Some months back I read of someone else wanting to create the same datacenters in international waters. Is this just a new way for them to try to avoid legal liability? If that's the case, I wonder what kind of content they will generate up there.

              MinaM This user is from outside of this forum
              MinaM This user is from outside of this forum
              Mina
              wrote last edited by
              #52

              @bit

              I believe, they have the idea that space is really cold, and their machines will need no cooling there.

              @sundogplanets

              bitB 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                Well, everyone, you can now submit a comment to let the FCC know what you think about SpaceX asking for 1 million satellites for "AI datacenters" whatever the fuck that means.

                https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-26-113A1.pdf

                Comments due March 6.

                I am having a very hard time believing this is really happening. Fuck you, SpaceX, and fuck you, FCC. This is not regulation, this is a fucking joke, that will destroy our ability to use satellites for centuries.

                Andrew RichensA This user is from outside of this forum
                Andrew RichensA This user is from outside of this forum
                Andrew Richens
                wrote last edited by
                #53

                @sundogplanets Many thanks for sharing the link - I wasn't aware of his at all. Absolutely disgusting! I shall be submitting some 'developmental feedback' to the FCC!

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                  Well, everyone, you can now submit a comment to let the FCC know what you think about SpaceX asking for 1 million satellites for "AI datacenters" whatever the fuck that means.

                  https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-26-113A1.pdf

                  Comments due March 6.

                  I am having a very hard time believing this is really happening. Fuck you, SpaceX, and fuck you, FCC. This is not regulation, this is a fucking joke, that will destroy our ability to use satellites for centuries.

                  tizilogicT This user is from outside of this forum
                  tizilogicT This user is from outside of this forum
                  tizilogic
                  wrote last edited by
                  #54

                  @sundogplanets ๐Ÿคฆ๐Ÿคฆ๐Ÿคฆ๐Ÿคฆ๐Ÿคฆ

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • MinaM Mina

                    @bit

                    I believe, they have the idea that space is really cold, and their machines will need no cooling there.

                    @sundogplanets

                    bitB This user is from outside of this forum
                    bitB This user is from outside of this forum
                    bit
                    wrote last edited by
                    #55

                    @mina @sundogplanets

                    I read an article about this, and there was a discussion section, and someone there was making this very argument that space is cold so cooling won't be required, which I thought at the time made total sense. But then someone else brought up the fact the ISS actually has trouble cooling itself, because while yes space is cold, there is so little matter around, it remains very difficult to dissipate heat. So now I'm not so sure.

                    MinaM M BerberichM mkjM 3 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • Eric LawtonE Eric Lawton

                      @sundogplanets

                      I appreciate any Americans that submit a complaint, but who exactly gave an American regulatory body authority over the whole of low Earth orbit and beyond?

                      Colonial theft.

                      @PhoenixSerenity

                      SibylleS This user is from outside of this forum
                      SibylleS This user is from outside of this forum
                      Sibylle
                      wrote last edited by
                      #56

                      @sundogplanets @PhoenixSerenity @EricLawton I think we - non US people - have to turn to our governments to tell them to stop this insanity.

                      Not that I have much confidence in the swiss gov, tough...

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • bitB bit

                        @mina @sundogplanets

                        I read an article about this, and there was a discussion section, and someone there was making this very argument that space is cold so cooling won't be required, which I thought at the time made total sense. But then someone else brought up the fact the ISS actually has trouble cooling itself, because while yes space is cold, there is so little matter around, it remains very difficult to dissipate heat. So now I'm not so sure.

                        MinaM This user is from outside of this forum
                        MinaM This user is from outside of this forum
                        Mina
                        wrote last edited by
                        #57

                        @bit

                        That's the point.

                        The only way to lose heat in space is through radiation.

                        I guess, tech bros learn their physics from chatboxes.

                        I also wonder, how they plan to protect their data centres from cosmic radiation.

                        @sundogplanets

                        M BerberichM Reinald KirchnerR Sepia FanS 3 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • MinaM Mina

                          @bit

                          That's the point.

                          The only way to lose heat in space is through radiation.

                          I guess, tech bros learn their physics from chatboxes.

                          I also wonder, how they plan to protect their data centres from cosmic radiation.

                          @sundogplanets

                          M BerberichM This user is from outside of this forum
                          M BerberichM This user is from outside of this forum
                          M Berberich
                          wrote last edited by
                          #58

                          @mina @bit @sundogplanets

                          They might not have learned anything and know nothing of physics.

                          They might have asked ChatGPT.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • MinaM Mina

                            @bit

                            That's the point.

                            The only way to lose heat in space is through radiation.

                            I guess, tech bros learn their physics from chatboxes.

                            I also wonder, how they plan to protect their data centres from cosmic radiation.

                            @sundogplanets

                            Reinald KirchnerR This user is from outside of this forum
                            Reinald KirchnerR This user is from outside of this forum
                            Reinald Kirchner
                            wrote last edited by
                            #59

                            @bit @sundogplanets @mina I heard the 486 CPU generations were way more robust against radiation 'cause of there larger structures. Maybe they get popular again. ๐Ÿซฃ

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • bitB bit

                              @mina @sundogplanets

                              I read an article about this, and there was a discussion section, and someone there was making this very argument that space is cold so cooling won't be required, which I thought at the time made total sense. But then someone else brought up the fact the ISS actually has trouble cooling itself, because while yes space is cold, there is so little matter around, it remains very difficult to dissipate heat. So now I'm not so sure.

                              M BerberichM This user is from outside of this forum
                              M BerberichM This user is from outside of this forum
                              M Berberich
                              wrote last edited by
                              #60

                              @bit @mina @sundogplanets

                              Space is not cold.
                              Temperature is a property of matter. In space there is noยน matter, so no temperature.

                              __________
                              ยน There is matter in space, but as it is a ultra-high vacuum, the density is so low that you can completely ignore it in this context.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • Conny NaschC This user is from outside of this forum
                                Conny NaschC This user is from outside of this forum
                                Conny Nasch
                                wrote last edited by
                                #61

                                @Doomed_Daniel @mmcknett @kiri @sundogplanets The voice of reason was noted in the comments to this very clarifying article. I am an artist/painter and not engineer, (my father and partner are), I am fascinated by engineering and science though. Thank you for this super perspective on the subject I watched last night on 3Sat "Nano", which chilled me to the bone.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                                  Well, everyone, you can now submit a comment to let the FCC know what you think about SpaceX asking for 1 million satellites for "AI datacenters" whatever the fuck that means.

                                  https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-26-113A1.pdf

                                  Comments due March 6.

                                  I am having a very hard time believing this is really happening. Fuck you, SpaceX, and fuck you, FCC. This is not regulation, this is a fucking joke, that will destroy our ability to use satellites for centuries.

                                  Graeme ๐Ÿด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ณ๓ ฃ๓ ด๓ ฟP This user is from outside of this forum
                                  Graeme ๐Ÿด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ณ๓ ฃ๓ ด๓ ฟP This user is from outside of this forum
                                  Graeme ๐Ÿด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ณ๓ ฃ๓ ด๓ ฟ
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #62

                                  @sundogplanets This is more about the upcoming ipo than reality. It's to make dumb investors wet themselves with excitement. At that level, it'll probably work...
                                  But still, needs a big NO from the FCC, who should not be the arbiter anyway, it's an international issue.
                                  I wonder what the Chinese think about it?!!

                                  Little Art HistoriesA 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • Graeme ๐Ÿด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ณ๓ ฃ๓ ด๓ ฟP Graeme ๐Ÿด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ณ๓ ฃ๓ ด๓ ฟ

                                    @sundogplanets This is more about the upcoming ipo than reality. It's to make dumb investors wet themselves with excitement. At that level, it'll probably work...
                                    But still, needs a big NO from the FCC, who should not be the arbiter anyway, it's an international issue.
                                    I wonder what the Chinese think about it?!!

                                    Little Art HistoriesA This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Little Art HistoriesA This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Little Art Histories
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #63

                                    @pa27 @sundogplanets
                                    Definitely. Investors already start asking when they are going to see revenue from the investments they made so our beloved tech-bros need a new flashy thing to distract from the fact that they are playing the Theranos-game all over again, raking in nonsensical amounts of money with the added bonus of destructing societies and the world.

                                    But maybe everything is just a ploy to get the Chinese and Russians to die from laughter about the stupidity of the west?

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • MinaM Mina

                                      @bit

                                      That's the point.

                                      The only way to lose heat in space is through radiation.

                                      I guess, tech bros learn their physics from chatboxes.

                                      I also wonder, how they plan to protect their data centres from cosmic radiation.

                                      @sundogplanets

                                      Sepia FanS This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Sepia FanS This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Sepia Fan
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #64

                                      @mina @bit @sundogplanets

                                      Deutschlandfunk had an interview with Prof. Dr.-Ing. Felix Huber (director of GSOC - German Space Operations Center) about this topic yesterday - and they discussed all the points. To me he sounded increasingly annoyed ;D

                                      - mass
                                      - size
                                      - space debris
                                      - heat
                                      - radiation
                                      - tech ageing
                                      - maintenance
                                      - replacement
                                      - de-orbiting
                                      - atmospheric pollution
                                      - communication
                                      - CO2 emissions

                                      Conclusion: ๐Ÿšฎ

                                      ๐ŸŽง German, 5 min:
                                      https://www.deutschlandfunk.de/ki-aus-dem-all-wie-realistisch-sind-weltraumgestuetzte-rechenzentren-100.html

                                      MinaM 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • Sepia FanS Sepia Fan

                                        @mina @bit @sundogplanets

                                        Deutschlandfunk had an interview with Prof. Dr.-Ing. Felix Huber (director of GSOC - German Space Operations Center) about this topic yesterday - and they discussed all the points. To me he sounded increasingly annoyed ;D

                                        - mass
                                        - size
                                        - space debris
                                        - heat
                                        - radiation
                                        - tech ageing
                                        - maintenance
                                        - replacement
                                        - de-orbiting
                                        - atmospheric pollution
                                        - communication
                                        - CO2 emissions

                                        Conclusion: ๐Ÿšฎ

                                        ๐ŸŽง German, 5 min:
                                        https://www.deutschlandfunk.de/ki-aus-dem-all-wie-realistisch-sind-weltraumgestuetzte-rechenzentren-100.html

                                        MinaM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        MinaM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        Mina
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #65

                                        @stekopf

                                        Gleich mal hรถren.

                                        @bit @sundogplanets

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                                          Well, everyone, you can now submit a comment to let the FCC know what you think about SpaceX asking for 1 million satellites for "AI datacenters" whatever the fuck that means.

                                          https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-26-113A1.pdf

                                          Comments due March 6.

                                          I am having a very hard time believing this is really happening. Fuck you, SpaceX, and fuck you, FCC. This is not regulation, this is a fucking joke, that will destroy our ability to use satellites for centuries.

                                          gunstickG This user is from outside of this forum
                                          gunstickG This user is from outside of this forum
                                          gunstick
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #66

                                          @sundogplanets the environment agency should have their word to say. Because all these millions of datacenters are going to be disposed off... And they won't be recycled. Just burned up. In the open. No filters. No catalysators. Just burned in the atmosphere.

                                          emmatonkinE 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups