@klappspatack Minetest/Luanti ist ziemlich einfach, aber es hat auch den Nachteil, dass man nicht bequem programmiert. Die REPL ist umstaendlich, d.h. wie Du das Ergebnis von ner Zeile Code siehst.

Ich wuerde mal auf Steam nach "The Farmer was Replaced" gucken: da lernt man spielerisch Python.

@KatyElphinstone "those with a milder form of autism such as Asperger's syndrome, often develop compensatory mechanisms to deal with their difficulties in understanding other people's thoughts. The details of these mechanisms are unknown"

The mechanisms are "unknown"? They're observation and deduction, forced on by having to figure out your illogical shit with no help from you and no manual.

What a twerp. They're supposed to be a scientist, and have this shit down.

Cthulhu weeps, that's bad.

@KatyElphinstone ... also how law works. At least that's the idea. Germany doesn't use so much case law (it still does), so the general idea is that first, the facts determine what the crime is, and THEN intentions influence whether the punishment is more or less severe than the baseline.

So how can one turn into a moral failing what the very foundation of our rule of law is supposedly built upon?

It boggles the mind.

@KatyElphinstone Like, none of this relates to Theory of Mind. At all.

"This shows that their judgments rely more on the outcome of the incident than on an understanding of the person's intentions"

Yes, two things about that.

a) People judge way more based on outcomes than intentions. It's a lesson driven home by every "you're so weird" I heard throughout my life. It takes real effort for folk to take intentions on board, and they're not usually willing to expend that effort.

And b) it's...

@KatyElphinstone I have rarely read an article so loaded with bad faith and bad assumptions. Wow. I can't even get to the points you're discussing over that.

@dianea this picture is totally unrealistic!

Computers are well known not to run without at least a cm of sticky fluff buildup on every surface.

@Kirsty @meganmariehart ... that kind of thing.

On the other hand, I've also insta-blocked people who slid into my mentions with the same kind of language that I see in LinkedIn DMs.

We're people here. Our passions are part of us. That's what we connect with.

(I mean me, fair, but it seems to reflect a good part of fedi.)

@Kirsty The thing is this: few people complain here about posting about what you do.

There are instances like .art that seek creators who post about what they do.

What people do NOT tend to react well to is the language of avdertising. This can also be about what you do (e.g. LinkedIn), or specific events and services.

What @meganmariehart gets 100% right is behaving as a human being with a job she shows passion for, where she will show what she does.

I haven't yet encountered anyone...

@futurebird Leftist purity wars have always been the Left's undoing. "Performative" is just the latest weapon in them.

@mrencyclopedia Ganondolf the Elven King.