BUT, look at "Ebola" and "Bundibugyo". These are places in Africa, that are presumably affected by negative press related to the viruses they lent their names to. (I already mentioned the "Sudan" example in an earlier toot.) We could rename, if there only were a sufficient push, BUT WE DO NOT. Is no one advocating for these places? We quickly put the kibosh on "Wuhan coronavirus", but still we use African toponyms for these viruses. One can make similar observations regarding other viruses named after other places in Africa, South America, and the rest of the so-called "Global South".Eventually, a respondent to this thread might bring up issues of race and class divisions, but I will stop myself here for the time being.(4/n, n=4)