Continue, or "try it now" a popup from Gmail now asks, offering to compose your next message with Gemini.
-
@briankrebs You get the same type nag notification, with the elusive and unclear button naming and choices, for other Google products, like Photos and Home, when they add Gemini features. @MsMerope @kahomono
-
Continue, or "try it now" a popup from Gmail now asks, offering to compose your next message with Gemini. I guess the tiny "x" is the "fuck no" button?
@briankrebs I recently got a business email using a term that is a notorious red flag lawsuit bait. I emailed the sender to politely point it out. They were horrified and admitted AI re-wrote it when they asked AI to make it 'more approachable, nicer.' They forgot to add "and 100% compliant with all laws and regulations."
-
and this is why I am going back to the 1990's style email server, spool, and a terminal window client that reads text. Just like the old Unix days as K&R intended.
@dianea @briankrebs Text only is the way. I was actually talking about the benefits of reading text only email with a friend whose company wanted better formatting in their html based emails. Yeah. Fuck that, text lines up perfectly and doesn’t need anything fancy. Simple does not mean deprecated or useless.
-
Continue, or "try it now" a popup from Gmail now asks, offering to compose your next message with Gemini. I guess the tiny "x" is the "fuck no" button?
@briankrebs no the X must be a "ask me again tomorrow "
Continue mean enable it but do not make a demo,
Try it now is enable it and make a demo
-
Continue, or "try it now" a popup from Gmail now asks, offering to compose your next message with Gemini. I guess the tiny "x" is the "fuck no" button?
@briankrebs I like the humaning part, where my brain has to do things. So GFY, Gemini.
-
@briankrebs no the X must be a "ask me again tomorrow "
Continue mean enable it but do not make a demo,
Try it now is enable it and make a demo
@lexinova @briankrebs
All that little X means is "Hide this dialog"!It has no bearing on the contents of that dialog.
-
@lexinova @briankrebs
All that little X means is "Hide this dialog"!It has no bearing on the contents of that dialog.
@HereToChewGum @briankrebs in my case it was a sarcasm, to say their : Maybe / Yes / Yes is a dark pattern
-
Continue, or "try it now" a popup from Gmail now asks, offering to compose your next message with Gemini. I guess the tiny "x" is the "fuck no" button?
at least they're honest that it composes "confidently", not "correctly"...
-
@HereToChewGum @briankrebs in my case it was a sarcasm, to say their : Maybe / Yes / Yes is a dark pattern
You could be inadvertently right tho. It can mean any of those depending in the case.
If I click on a result from a search engine and I get confronted by a similarly confusing dialog I never know which opton to take.
So recently I have been choosing to just close the tab...
It would be nice to have a R-click menu option to block that domain from the results of future searches.Is there an add-on for that?
-
@briankrebs You get the same type nag notification, with the elusive and unclear button naming and choices, for other Google products, like Photos and Home, when they add Gemini features. @MsMerope @kahomono
ugh... fortunately I have to use gmail. Both work and the volunteer group I help run use gmail.
-
@briankrebs I recently got a business email using a term that is a notorious red flag lawsuit bait. I emailed the sender to politely point it out. They were horrified and admitted AI re-wrote it when they asked AI to make it 'more approachable, nicer.' They forgot to add "and 100% compliant with all laws and regulations."
@pattykimura @briankrebs out of curiosity, i'm curious what the term was?
-
Continue, or "try it now" a popup from Gmail now asks, offering to compose your next message with Gemini. I guess the tiny "x" is the "fuck no" button?
@briankrebs I started getting these today, on my "business" account (family) the drive to upgrade to a better version has been going on for months.
-
N Marianne shared this topic on
-
bring back Eudora!!!
@MsMerope @dianea @briankrebs thunderbird is still around
-
@MsMerope @dianea @briankrebs thunderbird is still around
@ravenonthill @dianea @briankrebs
It might be nap time
I wacky parsed that as: -
Continue, or "try it now" a popup from Gmail now asks, offering to compose your next message with Gemini. I guess the tiny "x" is the "fuck no" button?
@briankrebs this is why I switched to Fastmail. Google's not going to stop pushing Gmail in unfortunate directions until they have a completely different promotion culture.
-
Continue, or "try it now" a popup from Gmail now asks, offering to compose your next message with Gemini. I guess the tiny "x" is the "fuck no" button?
@briankrebs The concept is wild, are you confident or do you need help writing the email?
-
Continue, or "try it now" a popup from Gmail now asks, offering to compose your next message with Gemini. I guess the tiny "x" is the "fuck no" button?
@briankrebs classic tech "innovation," tactic. If they don't want it... Force them to use it.
-
Continue, or "try it now" a popup from Gmail now asks, offering to compose your next message with Gemini. I guess the tiny "x" is the "fuck no" button?
@briankrebs I have smart features & personalization disabled to turn off Gemini and I STILL get this message. Evil.
-
@pattykimura @briankrebs out of curiosity, i'm curious what the term was?
"good fit" vis a vis advertising employment preferences without directly naming acceptable qualifying required work-related attributes like "collaborative" or "detailed-oriented" or "timely" to explain context. This is because "good fit" can be (has been) used as an unlawful way to exclude qualified candidates who do not share race or gender or religion etc. attributes of the majority employed, ie "fit in".
-
"good fit" vis a vis advertising employment preferences without directly naming acceptable qualifying required work-related attributes like "collaborative" or "detailed-oriented" or "timely" to explain context. This is because "good fit" can be (has been) used as an unlawful way to exclude qualified candidates who do not share race or gender or religion etc. attributes of the majority employed, ie "fit in".
@pattykimura interesting! thank you
